Recommended Posts

15 pages in the original thread is long enough, especially with a slew of upcoming launches.

Thread 1: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/991330-spacex-updates-grasshopper-rlv/page__pid__594758226__st__210#entry594758226

First update is the satellite manifest for the second Falcon 9 / Dragon resupply mission to the ISS, preliminarily set for December 15, 2012. The first ISS resupply (CRS1) is tentatively set for August.

I find three particularly interesting; TJSat (the first sat built by a high school), PhoneSat 2.0 (based on an Android 2.1 cell phone) and CubeSst's micro lunar orbiter & lander weighing just 1.33 kg.

Most of these are nano or pico satellites weighing <2 kg, made possible by advances in miniaturization. This is an exploding market segment. Tiny Borg cubes, they are.

Links are to the satellite project page or a PDF.

Launch: NET December 15, 2012

Launcher: Falcon 9 ?(KSC SLC-40)

Primary: Dragon CRS2 (ISS resupply)

Secondaries -

CUSat 1 & 2 (Cornell University)

CubeSat Lunar Orbiter & Lander (!!)

SwampSat (test small sat attitude controls

Black Night 1 (West Point Military Academy)

IPEX/SPA-1 Trailblazer (JPL: Intelligent Payload Experiment & Space Plug & play Architecture)

TetherSat (Naval Academy: test a 1 mile space tether)

TJSat (Thomas Jefferson High School (!!))

DragonSat 1 (Drexel University)

Copper-Cube (Close Orbit Propellant Plume and Elemental Recognition)

PhoneSat 2.0 (based on Android 2.1 phone parts !!)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1068372-spacex-updates-thread-2/
Share on other sites

2 large pics of the Falcon 9 / Dragon C2/C3 rollout before the wet dressed rehearsal. Note the plastic cover over Dragon, the solar panel outriggers, and the new white room on the transporter / erector.

The final pre-launch clearance evaluation by NASA will take place April 16th, and if everything is good then launch is still set for April 30th. A 10 second hot-fire test of the 9 Merlin engines is to take place a few days before launch.

In other SpaceX news -

The first stage of CRS-1, the first full load ISS resupply mission, is being prepped at the McGregor, Texas test facility for a tentative August 2012 launch - if Dragon C2/C3 goes as expected.

post-347280-0-36842900-1333857962_thumb.

post-347280-0-08140400-1333858002_thumb.

  • Like 1

Could be we have a new SpaceX spaceport - the FAA is doing an assessment.

5 miles South of Port Isabel, Texas, and the FAA has started the permitting process.

Link to FAA PDF....

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Notice of Intent to Prepare an

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Open a Public Scoping Period, and Conduct a

Public Scoping Meeting

AGENCY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the lead Federal agency.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS, Open a Public Scoping Period, and

Conduct a Public Scoping Meeting

SUMMARY: This Notice provides information to Federal, State, and local agencies,

Native American tribes, and other interested persons regarding the FAA?s intent to

prepare an EIS for Space Exploration Technologies? (SpaceX?s) proposal to launch the

Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy orbital vertical launch vehicles from a private site located in

Cameron County, Texas. Under the Proposed Action, SpaceX proposes to construct a

vertical launch area and a control center area to support up to 12 commercial launches per year.

The vehicles to be launched include the Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy (up to two per

year), and a variety of smaller reusable suborbital launch vehicles. SpaceX would be

required to apply for the appropriate launch licenses and/or experimental permits to be

issued by the FAA. The FAA will prepare the EIS in accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 United States Code [u.S.C.] 4321 et seq.),

the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural

Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500-1508), and FAA

Order 1050.1E, Change 1, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, as part of its

licensing and permitting process.

>

>

Proposed Action

The Proposed Action is for the FAA to issue launch licenses and/or experimental permits

to SpaceX that would allow SpaceX to launch the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy orbital

vertical launch vehicles and a variety of reusable suborbital launch vehicles from a

launch site on privately-owned property in Cameron County, Texas. The Falcon 9 orbital

vertical launch vehicle is a medium-lift class launch vehicle with a gross lift-off weight of

approximately 1,000,000 pounds (lbs) with a maximum length of 230 feet (ft). The

Falcon 9 uses liquid oxygen (LOX) and highly refined kerosene, also known as rocket

propellant-1 or refined petroleum-1 (RP-1), as propellants to carry payloads into orbit.

The Falcon Heavy is similar to the Falcon 9, except it has an additional two boosters

?strapped on,? each booster being almost identical to the Falcon 9 first stage core. The

Falcon Heavy is a heavy lift class launch vehicle with a gross lift-off weight of

approximately 3,400,000 lbs. It has an overall maximum length of approximately 230 ft.

A reusable suborbital launch vehicle could consist of a Falcon 9 Stage 1 tank with a

maximum propellant (RP-1 and LOX) load of approximately 6,900 gallons.

As part of the Proposed Action, SpaceX proposes to construct a vertical launch area and a

control center area. The proposed vertical launch area site is currently undeveloped and

is located directly adjacent to the eastern terminus of Texas State Highway 4 (Boca Chica

Boulevard) and approximately 3 miles north of the Mexican border on the Gulf Coast. It

is located approximately 5 miles south of Port Isabel and South Padre Island. At the

vertical launch area, the new facilities required would include: an integration- and

processing-hangar, a launch pad and stand with its associated flame duct, propellant

storage and handling areas, a workshop and office area, and a warehouse for parts

storage.

The control center area would be located inland to the west of the vertical launch area and

would include: a control center building and a payload processing facility; it might also

include a launch vehicle preparation hangar and satellite fuels storage. All facilities

would be constructed on private land owned or leased by SpaceX. The development of

access and supporting utility infrastructure for the vertical launch area and the control

center area may occur on lands outside that which is owned or leased by SpaceX.

Operations would consist of up to 12 launches per year with a maximum of two Falcon

Heavy launches. All Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches would be expected to have

commercial payloads, including satellites or experimental payloads. In addition to

standard payloads, the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy may also carry a capsule, such as the

SpaceX Dragon capsule. All launch trajectories would be to the east over the Gulf of

Mexico.

>

>

SpaceX%20Texas%20Spaceport%203-640.jpg

SpaceX%20Texas%20Spaceport%201-640.jpg

phew, was sure i missed out on the upcoming launch because i remember it was scheduled for March before i took a long leave of absence from neowin! Thanks for the updates as always Doc, so April 30? This is unmanned Dragon to low orbit, right? or will she dock with ISS for this one?

It depends on the status of the flight, which is a merged C2 and C3 mission. This was done to get it operational ASAP and accelerate the DragonRider crewed version.

In the C2 phase they will go to ISS altitude but not approach it. There they'll test out the systems, do some maneuvers to check its avionics, safety systems etc.

If that goes well then the C3 phase starts and goes to ISS and berth with about 1,200 kg of cargo. It'll spend about 21 days there then return with about 1,400 kg of return cargo, landing in the Pacific off California.

The Dragon hasn't tested propulsive landing yet because the SuperDraco thrusters are still under development. SuperDraco has been fired many times, and there are video's on YouTube, so much of the work is lightening & optimizing it They are due to be presented to NASA for launch escape use until ~May 25, and once integrated and tested for that the landing tests can start.

The F9 stage landing tests are the Grasshopper program, and the pad for those is under construction in McGregor Texas. It should be almost done as the last Google Earth satellite photos ~4 months ago showed the earthwork well underway. They'll test the first stage first, short tethered hops first, then higher & supersonic. The FAA clearance documents predicted a 3 year development.

While all this is going on they are also building the first Falcon Heavy for shipment to Vandenberg around the end of the year, and there are ~ 8-9 Dragons and several Falcon 9's in various stages of construction. They are also developing 2-3 new engines, one to debut early next year and a Falcon Heavy test stand. Full plate.

SpaceX Dragon Demonstration Flight Coverage on NASA Television (all times Eastern)

?

Watch NASA TV

May 6, Sunday

1:00 p.m. ? SpaceX/Falcon 9 Dragon Pre-Launch Briefing ? KSC (All Channels)

May 7, Monday

8 a.m. ? SpaceX/Falcon 9 Dragon Launch Coverage Begins ? KSC (Launch scheduled at 9:38 a.m. EDT; All Channels)

11 a.m. ? SpaceX/Falcon 9 Dragon Post-Launch Briefing ? KSC (All Channels)

May 8, Tuesday

11 a.m. ? ISS Update ? JSC (All Channels)

May 9, Wednesday

11 a.m. ? ISS Update ? JSC (All Channels)

May 10, Thursday

2:30 a.m. ? SpaceX/Dragon ISS Fly-Under Demonstration Test Coverage ? JSC (All Channels)

10 a.m. ? SpaceX/Dragon Mission Status Briefing ? JSC and Hawthorne, CA (All Channels; time subject to change)

11 a.m. ? ISS Update ? JSC (All Channels)

May 11, Friday

2 a.m. ? SpaceX/Dragon ISS Grapple and Berthing Coverage ? JSC (All Channels; grapple scheduled at 8:30 a.m. EDT, berthing no earlier than 12 p.m. EDT; times subject to change)

1 p.m. ? SpaceX/Dragon Mission Status Briefing ? JSC and Hawthorne, CA (All Channels; time subject to change)

May 12, Saturday

TBD ? ISS Expedition 31 Crew SpaceX/Dragon Hatch Opening and Ceremony ? JSC (All Channels)

May 14, Monday

TBD ? ISS Expedition 31 SpaceX/Dragon In-Flight Event ? JSC (All Channels

damn it was supposed to be the 30th... my dad's ashes are being launched on the one launching in FL!!!! So you say it's gonna launch on the 7th.. damn that's a long ways away... my mom had to rebook the hotel allready... I will be going down there with her and my sister as well to that launch... grrr I hate how it was postponed... I was broken up about it becuase the 30th was the day my dad died in 2010.... that would have been perfect. this makes me torn up bad inside...

SFN....

>

Launch preparations continued Tuesday while SpaceX and NASA worked on the Dragon's software reviews.

Filling of the Dragon capsule's hypergolic propellant tanks was supposed to be completed Tuesday, according to Kirstin Brost Grantham, a SpaceX spokesperson.

The spacecraft was scheduled to be rotated from a vertical position to a horizontal orientation Thursday and attached to the upper stage of the Falcon 9 launcher inside SpaceX's hangar.

The aerodynamic nose cone is set to be integrated to the forward end of the Dragon capsule Friday.

A brief firing of the Falcon rocket's nine Merlin first stage engines is scheduled for April 30. SpaceX conducts a hotfire test of the Falcon 9's engines before each launch to check their health.

A technical review meeting is planned for Friday, and a SpaceX launch readiness review is set for May 5, according to an official familiar with the Dragon mission.

As currently envisioned, the schedule would make possible a launch attempt May 7, assuming NASA and SpaceX finish software testing.

SpaceX's launch on May 7 is booked on the U.S. Air Force range after the May 3 blastoff of a United Launch Alliance Atlas 5 rocket with a military communications satellite.

>

Wired video interview with Musk -

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/04/elon-musk-hangout/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialmedia&utm_campaign=wiredscienceclickthru

A MAJOR takeaway at the end is that if all goes well there will be an announcement late this year or sometime next year of a new family of rockets geared to Mars. The focus right now is ISS, but he has an idea how to pull Mars off. It also sounded like they'll go it alone if they have to.

Let the speculation begin ;)

Hotfire webcast at http://www.spacex.com Monday, April 30 with coverage starting at 2:30 PM ET and the hotfire at 3:00 PM ET. Only 2 seconds this time - flight 1 was 10 sec and flight 2 was 4 sec. Seems they're gaining confidence in the system.

http://spaceref.biz/2012/04/spacex-to-webcast-static-fire.html

Z317.jpg

DragonSpacecraft4-12.jpg

A big pic of Dragon, and another of it being integrated to Falcon 9.

Hotfire still on for Monday and launch for May 10th. This ISS launch window is classified as instantaneous, meaning if they don't hit it exactly the launch has to be rescheduled for the next window.

post-347280-0-02805400-1335581881.jpg

post-347280-0-48111700-1335582023_thumb.

remixed: you father's ashes? please accept my condolences, but do explain?

Doc: thanks for the Wired interview, really awesome, i'm loving Elon more and more, he's the kind of guy we need for this. Together with Planetary Resources, this gives me so much hope (drinks another pint)

Celestis is a company that does space burials... my mom went with them to make my dad's final dream come true. I am very irritated it keeps geting pushed back, as we need to go down there for the event. My mom keeps having to re-book the hotel over and over and she might not get a decent room as a result of this. she also has to call off work and her job is tougher to do that as it's a travelling time sensitive job. This is very unsettling for me becuase I also really need a vacation. My life is pretty much crap right now and I need to get away from the hellhole that my area is for a while. Also the 30th is when my dad died so this is a very tragic and bad time for me... it just seems like so much is hell right now for me and I miss my dad so much. (I am crying so hard typing this BTW I'm in great pain right now as a result of this turbulance and crap)

Thank you neoadorable.

The Falcon 9's engine hot-fire test webcast here: http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php

Coverage starts today April 30, 2012 at 2:30 PM ET / 11:30 AM PT

Falcon 9 / Dragon has been rolled out and is on the pad.

1984x3000 image below - download to see it at its best.

post-347280-0-42340900-1335775966_thumb.

NBC Cosmic Log....

SpaceX fires Falcon's rocket engines

SpaceX conducted a successful test firing of a Falcon 9 rocket's engines on its Cape Canaveral launch pad, one week before its precedent-setting launch to the International Space Station. But it took more than one try.

The initial countdown was halted just 47 seconds before the nine engines were scheduled to start up. SpaceX fixed what it called a "limit that was improperly set" on the flight computer and quickly set up another countdown. The second countdown proceeded smoothly, and the rocket's nine engines fizzed to life for two seconds as expected, at 4:15 p.m. ET today.

"Woohoo, rocket hold-down firing completed and all looks good!!" SpaceX's millionaire founder, Elon Musk, reported in a Twitter update. Meanwhile, company spokeswoman Kirstin Brost Grantham said "engineers will now review data as we continue preparations for the upcoming launch."

This was a full dress rehearsal for SpaceX's second official demonstration flight for NASA. The first demo flight, back in December 2010, sent a gumdrop-shaped Dragon space capsule into orbit for the first time. The second flight, scheduled to lift off as early as May 7, could see the Dragon go all the way to the space station.

>

Sigh -

Another launch delay while NASA and SpaceX continue software tests. NET is now May 10, but we should know an exact date within a few days. Seems SpaceX is programming their VxWorks / Linux systems in C++ while the NASA Mission Control Center (MCC) programmers only speak C and FORTRAN.

Anyhow - from the Elon Musk Associated Press tweet chat -

@elonmusk

-Figuring out new no-earlier-than launch date with NASA. Should know in next few days

-SpaceX is great at making things super light. Tesla is great at mass production & batteries

-5 years max before we fly civilans.

-Am hoping to travel to orbit in about 5 years, beyond in 7 to 10.

-For humanity to have an exciting & inspiring future, we cannot be confined to Earth forever

-Definitely. Long term goal of SpaceX making life multiplanetary.

-Am highly confident that Mars can be self-sustaining without terraforming

-Rally people around the idea of making life multiplanetary with a base on Mars

Finally an official new date, and a nice pic taken during the hot-fire below -

May 19 at 4:55 AM EDT. Night launch!

If this 'instant launch window' is missed the next possible target date is May 22.

New NASA TV schedule -

May 18, Friday

1 p.m. - SpaceX/Falcon 9 Dragon Pre-Launch Briefing - KSC (All Channels)

May 19, Saturday

3:30 a.m. - SpaceX/Falcon 9 Dragon Launch Coverage Begins (Launch scheduled at 4:55 a.m. EDT) - KSC (All Channels)

7:30 a.m. - SpaceX/Falcon 9 Dragon Post-Launch News Conference - KSC (All Channels)

May 21, Monday

2:30 a.m. - SpaceX/Dragon Fly-Under of the ISS Coverage - JSC (All Channels)

10 a.m. - SpaceX/Dragon Mission Status Briefing - JSC (All Channels)

May 22, Tuesday

2 a.m. - SpaceX/Dragon ISS Grapple and Berthing Coverage - JSC (All Channels)

1 p.m. - SpaceX/Dragon Mission Status Briefing (Time subject to change) - JSC (All Channels)

May 23, Wednesday

7:30 a.m. - SpaceX/Dragon Hatch Opening Coverage - JSC (All Channels)

TBD - ISS Expedition 31 Post-SpaceX/Dragon Hatch Opening Crew News Conference - JSC (All Channels)

post-347280-0-85294900-1336185371_thumb.

remixed: sorry i didn't write again sooner. i hope you are feeling better now. what about the plans for your father's ashes, is everything ok now? you can always come to neowin for a shoulder, i've taken advantage of that a lot recently :cry:

and what's wrong with your area? please do keep us posted with how things are going!

thanks a lot for posting this Doc, and for the updated schedule. i love NASA TV and have marked my scheduler to make sure i remember to watch this! and i'm glad we can now buy SpaceX swag, i need to get some to support the Great Cause.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!