Paragon GPT Loader lets 3TB drives work under Windows XP


Recommended Posts

Paragon GPT Loader lets 3TB drives work under Windows XP

Nov. 3, 2010 (3:35 pm) By: Matthew Humphries

paragon_GPTL-559x440.jpg

Many users are continuing to use Windows XP instead of upgrading to Windows 7 mainly because they don't believe the upgrade is necessary. Depending on what you use your PC for that may be the case, but as technology moves forward XP begins to come up short in some areas.

One such area is that of storage space on hard drives. Windows XP can only recognize hard drives up to 2.2TB in size. 3TB drives are now becoming commonplace, and eventually they will become the most cost effective and easiest to source drives.

So where does this leave XP users? 3TB+ drives can be used with an XP system, but only 2.2TB of space will be usable meaning you are paying for storage you'll never be able to use. However, Paragon Software claims to have a solution in the form of the Paragon GPT Loader.

GPTL consists of a special driver that adds support for GUID Partition Tables under Windows XP. That means a 3TB+ drive can be installed with all of its storage space usable. There are a few caveats, though. GPTL will only work on drives that do not contain the Windows operating system for your machine, so any 3TB drive would have to form a secondary storage drive. There is also no provision for using RAID or having the drive as external to your machine.

Even with those limitations this may be the simplest way to increase storage with the latest hard drives under Windows XP. The good news is it's currently free to download and use GPTL through Paragon's Early Adopter Program.

Read more at the Paragon Software press release

Rudy. Did you miss the list of caveats? The only way to overcome these is by upgrading to Windows 7. Duh!

There are a few caveats, though. GPTL will only work on drives that do not contain the Windows operating system for your machine, so any 3TB drive would have to form a secondary storage drive. There is also no provision for using RAID or having the drive as external to your machine.

it is clear from the article that you can't boot from this drive anyway , if you gonna use this method

that would need also UEFI, anyway

---

just wait until they change sector size for HDD, say good bye for grumpy OS !

edit:

this thing is in beta/preview sure it would be great idea to keep your data with it whistle.gifrolleyes.gif

Did you miss the list of caveats? The only way to overcome these is by upgrading to Windows 7. Duh!

There are no caveats for data partitions. If you want to boot from a GPT drive only on an EFI system (which are hardly mainstream), you would need 64-bit Vista or Windows 7 (even 32-bit Windows 7 doesn't support that) but that limitation might also be addressed sooner or later by Paragon for all 32-bit OSes. This essentially brings 32-bit XP up to the same level of GPT support as XP x64 or Server 2003 x64.

And even if they change the sector size, manufacturers like Seagate emulate 512 k sectors and are incorporating logic in the circuit board for oldes OSes to work around in their logic board or they would see drop in their own product's sales.

Point is, industry always works around limitations if the OS is in use by the mass market. I personally would use such large drives only for storing data and use an SSD for the OS.

And even if they change the sector size, manufacturers like Seagate emulate 512 k sectors and are incorporating logic in the circuit board for oldes OSes to work around in their logic board or they would see drop in their own product's sales.

how so?

most pc now a day are sold with Win7

and most sales goes with OEMs

so.....

i don't see the point of putting huge harddrive in obsolate pc platform (e.g. P4s )

Rudy, can you explain or show what components of Windows 7 exactly make use of multiple cores or what APIs, interfaces or frameworks does it offer to app developers to write more efficient multi core apps? You can get quad cores or octo cores and happily compute on XP. W7 does nothing multiCORE specific to accelerate any component. Do you not know you have to write code specifically to get advantage of multi-cores? Almost everyone seems to have this false impression that W7 and Vista have some magical wonderful "multiprocessor support". Now what that better multiprocessor support is, I don't see anywhere documented on MSDN. There's Parallel Patterns Library for native code and ParallelFX for .NET which is Visual Studio features available on all OSes for which you can compile. No OS play is involved. IE9 is the only app that I know whose Chakra engine takes advantage of multiple cores.

Rudy, can you explain or show what components of Windows 7 exactly make use of multiple cores or what APIs, interfaces or frameworks does it offer to app developers to write more efficient multi core apps? You can get quad cores or octo cores and happily compute on XP. W7 does nothing multiCORE specific to accelerate any component. Do you not know you have to write code specifically to get advantage of multi-cores? Almost everyone seems to have this false impression that W7 and Vista have some magical wonderful "multiprocessor support". Now what that better multiprocessor support is, I don't see anywhere documented on MSDN. There's Parallel Patterns Library for native code and ParallelFX for .NET which is Visual Studio features available on all OSes for which you can compile. No OS play is involved.

Uh? My point is that XP still has a place in today's computers, sure Win7 can do a lot of things but XP will satisfy most people's needs

Rudy, can you explain or show what components of Windows 7 exactly make use of multiple cores or what APIs, interfaces or frameworks does it offer to app developers to write more efficient multi core apps? You can get quad cores or octo cores and happily compute on XP. W7 does nothing multiCORE specific to accelerate any component. Do you not know you have to write code specifically to get advantage of multi-cores? Almost everyone seems to have this false impression that W7 and Vista have some magical wonderful "multiprocessor support". Now what that better multiprocessor support is, I don't see anywhere documented on MSDN. There's Parallel Patterns Library for native code and ParallelFX for .NET which is Visual Studio features available on all OSes for which you can compile. No OS play is involved. IE9 is the only app that I know whose Chakra engine takes advantage of multiple cores.

So what exactly does your wordy rant have to do with 3GB drives?

:rolleyes:

So what exactly does your wordy rant have to do with 3GB drives?

Rant? What rant? I asked a genuine question. :) You would need to read the all the posts in a thread, you know, so you will understand how the posts relate to each other. :p

I think the point simply needs to be driven home, that if you want to continue using the latest hardware the way it was designed to be used, you need to use the latest operating systems with it as well. If people want to cling onto an OS that is nearly 10 years old, that is their decision, however they should not expect the latest and greatest to work flawlessly with it. It's great that paragon have a partially working solution, however this is just another example of just how dated XP is

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!