Huge Yahoo! authentification security bug


Recommended Posts

A huge bug has been discovered in Yahoo! authentification mechanism affecting third party applications, even those created by Yahoo!A member of the Yahoo! Mail Group has discovered that people having connected third party applications may have a problem if they lose their smartphone. Indeed, despite what Yahoo says, changing the password will not be enough. This will not totally revok access to those third party applications.

Explanations :

Someone using Yahoo! services and owning a smartphone may have have installed the Yahoo Mail application for Android, Yahoo! Messenger on Android and iOS or the Yahoo! Mobile application. Even though those have been developed by Yahoo! those are considered as third party applications just like Yahoo! Messenger for Mac OS X or web services inviting you to connect with your Yahoo! ID like Facebook or Twitterfeed.

Should that person lose his smartphone, he may go ahead and change his Yahoo! password so that no one can actually dig into the address book or read his email. Upon password change, Yahoo! mentions that third party applications access will be revoked, but in truth, the lost/stolen smartphone is not safer that before.

Web user ?sy1bzbn? explains:

What does this mean? It means if you were using the YMail app on your lostphone, then whoever has physical access to it can continue to READ, SEND, and REPLY. If you were using the YMessenger app, then that person can impersonate you until you signed into YMessenger elsewhere.

I myself tested this on the iPhone. After changing my password, a pop-up alerted me that a new authentification was necessary but I could simply tap on it to make it disappear and continue using the Yahoo! Messenger application. I was able to send messages, receive IM notifications, browse my contacts and see who was connected. People?s online status were properly updated live. In fact, I was able to access Yahoo! Messenger, even after rebooting the phone!

The connection was permanently maintained and one has to manually dig into the application options to turn it off. In fact I was able to connect both on my iPhone and on Yahoo! Mail Messenger with the updated password. Two instances were running and the conversations were updating on both screen. Remember ; the two sessions had two different passwords! Only the Yahoo! Voice calls failed to go through.That?s pretty bad for Yahoo!

Source : Clubic.com (French) - translated on Streamlog

if you had an application installed that had access to your account from your mobile device - and you lost one or more of your mobile devices, wouldn't you for starters report the phone lost/stolen and it would be disabled by your phone carrier?

Also wouldn't you just with common sense revoke said applications access to your account? Are you saying the user does not have the ability to revoke applications access to their account once given?

Not a yahoo user myself, but I would think you would have to have the ability to revoke applications access to your account whenever you deemed it fitting.

It does seem like an issue sure - but seems some common sense security measures would clearly mitigate the issue. I would have to think that once it has been pointed to yahoo that they would correct such a flaw posthaste?

@Budman no indeed you cannot really revoked access to those third party apps. Even if you dig in your Yahoo! account and revoke those access + change your password... someone finding your phone will still be able to use those applications with your ID. Those applications need to be manually logged out from the phone...

You tell me it's feature ? i tell you it's a huge bug

Web user ?sy1bzbn? explains:

What does this mean? It means if you were using the YMail app on your lostphone, then whoever has physical access to it can continue to READ, SEND, and REPLY. If you were using the YMessenger app, then that person can impersonate you until you signed into YMessenger elsewhere.

Isnt that stating the obvious. and I like how they say "Web User" haha as if they were some kind of Technology Expert lol

Again I am not a yahoo user, but I think its unfathomable to me that the user would not have the ability to REVOKE an applications access to their account?

On google for example

post-14624-0-72504500-1326837518.jpg

I can see how there could be an issue with just changing your password does not revoke. User would not like the fact that every time they changed their password all applications lost access. That could be a nightmare. But you should be able to REVOKE their access.

But yeah change of email password not revoking application access to me would seem like a feature ;) Users would be dumbfounded why X no longer worked every time they changed their yahoo email password.

I don't see a major issue with that, IF the user can directly revoke access from said application via some method.

edit: ok quick google ;)

http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/developer/moreinfo/moreinfoapis.html

Changing Permissions If you previously granted a third-party application access to your data, you may revoke permissions at any time by visiting your Application Management page. Doing so might adversely affect the performance and functionality of installed applications if it requires access to your profile data.

Seems like to me you can revoke access whenever you want.

The above article says the user changed his password, he says nothing about actually revoking access.. So I would have to agree, like I said an application should not be revoked just because you changed your yahoo email password. That would be a big issue for lots and lots of users!!

edit2: I think I might try this, I know I can install yahoo on my blackberry -- I think I will give it a try. Because sofar it seems like this article is pure scaremongering from what I can tell. No **** changing your password on your email should not revoke all applications access, why would anyone think that. And where did they read that from yahoo?

Ok created an yahoo account.. Logged in, then when to change my password - I don't see anything saying my applications access will be revoked?

post-14624-0-82083300-1326838537.jpg

Now I have to leave - the beer after work is calling me ;) But while at the bar I will install yahoo on my phone. And then later I will revoke it and see what happens..

If you want to chat with me at the bar, my new yahoo account is [email protected] ;)

@ChuckFinley : "Isnt that stating the obvious. and I like how they say "Web User" haha as if they were some kind of Technology Expert lol"

And you think you are.... ?

@Budman : Again

I had Yahoo Messenger installed and running on the iPhone.

I quit the app

I changed my password

I got a message telling me that my third party application would not work

I check my iPhone=> Yahoo! Messenger still working

Also manually revoking access to 3rd party apps through the account notification would not do it.

I check my iPhone=> Yahoo! Messenger still working

Not sure how to make it clearer

Again no where on the change password page does it say its going to revoke anything??

I changed my yahoo account password, did not say anything about revoking my apps

here are my apps

post-14624-0-59087300-1326864803_thumb.p

So after I changed my password on my Account I went back to my kindle fire - and says sign in required, and will not let me access my mail. No hitting cancel or backspace, etc.. did not let me in. So from my own testing so far is not matching up with what your saying.

Here is me changing my password -- where are you saying your getting told changing your password will revoke or break your applications?

post-14624-0-78454700-1326865357.png

Now in the morning I will try it on my blackberry and see what happens with messenger app, wouldn't install on my KF but got a IMO app to work with yahoo, but I want to test actually chatting and contacts etc.. and then go in and test.

But so far changing password blocked access on my KF yahoo mail app, and I didn't even revoke access.

@BudMan : "I changed my yahoo account password, did not say anything about revoking my apps"

Really ? ...I did the process again, here is what i get

screenshot20120118at911.png

I went back to my Yahoo! Messenger on the iPhone and here is what i get:

doneme.jpg

Now as stated before, all i have to do is to tap on this notification to continue using the application logged in with a different password (the previous one). And again, as stated before, i can reboot the phone or quit the application so that it's not running in the background... i'll still be able to use it. I have to manually sign out byt going into the options at shown below :

photo180112092142.png

What is "Yahoo! Go Phone" -- I do not think that is the messenger app your using. Which I see here and doesn't seem like its called that

http://itunes.apple....d309219097?mt=8

So ok it revoked app A, does not mean app B will not still work.. Like I said changing your password should really not revoke apps.

I went to go check my blackberry this morning - and it seems our IT dept has blocked by policy messenger ;) Other yahoo app I found was just a mobile frontend not really an app. Wait til my son wakes up and will try on his phone, I know he uses yahoo messenger..

Dude sorry what I am seeing is not matching up with what your saying.. Now go into your apps, see that link there and do you see a messenger link. Revoke THAT, now does you messenger work on your phone?

Well, anyways, I contacted Yahoo! Security a few days ago and they came back to me saying that in some cases they found no problem and in other cases they were able to replicate the problem. I was told that they were working on a fix. That's the good news for Yahoo! users i guess :)

Not sure how this is gonna be deployed. Either though an app update or on their server side...

You find it "unlikely". Seriously, who do you think you are to judge each of my posts like this ?

if I tell this happened, then this happened.

But then you know what. i could as well say that i don't believe what you said earlier. You just photoshoped images and invented a story as well.

It was not an email it was a phone call.

You want to see the previous warning i sent to them ? Sure. Do you read French? here is the first reply

http://img814.images...2789/emailf.jpg

Have fun

I work as a journalist and this French Yahoo! PR contacted Yahoo Security EMEA and Sunnyvale and call me back at lunch time

Do you also want her phone number to check ? Cause i can give it to you if you're still skeptical ? You wanna call her? Let me know i'll PM you her number but then you better record your phone conversation.

Dude I am not judging your posts, I am just saying I could not duplicate anything you were saying.

You post something that could be seen as pure SCARE MONGERING and yahoo bashing -- ie their security is flawed.

Your tests should be very easy for someone to duplicate -- I don't see anyone here in this thread saying they could duplicate your example. Seem I was the only one even attempting to verify your statements. And from my test they did not hold water - sorry!

So have you actually went in and revoked access to messenger?

I really shouldn't have to repeat myself that changing a password does not mean applications that you have given access to should be revoked from said access.

Your post of Go Yahoo when you changed your passed -- that does not seem like "messenger" to me.

So post up your applications -- I posted mine showing messenger and mail applications having access. And all I had to do was change my password and email on my KF instantly required password to re access. But to be honest I should really have to revoke the access directly to cause what it did.

So actually Revoke messanger application from having access and then lets see your access and there might be something to talk about.

You have not shown anything backing up your claim that makes sense, and then you say you contacted Yahoo and they got back to you saying that they duplicated your issue some times, in 2 days they lab this out and got back to you -- come on dude how can someone not be skeptical at such claims.

Again what do you not understand here?

YES i did manually revok those applications and YES again, described in the first post, i was able to access Y! Messenger after that

Yahoo Go Phone is a former java-based Yahoo Mobile app. It is immediately added to my Yahoo account when first signing Yahoo! Messenger on the iPhone which means that Yahoo Go became Yahoo! Messenger

And this is precisely written by the web user in the link i mention in my 1st post.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Y-Mail/message/22692

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!