Vulnerability Affects Firefox and IE, New and Old


Recommended Posts

A newly discovered vulnerability, which the CTO of security services firm Secunia described this morning as affecting Internet Explorer 7.0, can also affect not only IE6 but Firefox versions 1.5 and 2.0, as observed by BetaNews in our own tests.

The vulnerability can become an easy exploit, and has actually been an annoyance for developers for years: Essentially, code within a Web page has the capability to address new popup windows as they appear, by means of a JavaScript trigger. If the event that code is executed prior to the code for the popup window's own page, it can effectively pre-empt the popup window's content, substituting its own.

If a popup blocker is enabled, the exploit should theoretically be disabled. However, if popup blocking is turned off, or if a malicious page is open in one browser window while an "exception site" -- a page where popups are allowed -- resides in another, the exploit is still feasible.

BetaNews was able to trigger the exploit not only for both Internet Explorer versions 6 and 7, but also Firefox versions 1.5 and 2.0, in the latter case when such exception sites were open along with the Secunia test page.

In fact, on one system, we were able to trigger the exploit in Firefox 1.5 with popup blocking turned on.

While the vulnerability apparently remains an annoyance across the board, Secunia's message this morning was oriented specifically toward IE7. "A vigilant user has been testing IE7," Secunia reported, "and found that it actually is vulnerable in a default configuration to the 'Window Injection Vulnerability."'

Years ago, when the vulnerability was first discovered, Microsoft created a security setting for IE6, which is accessible from the Internet Options control panel. Specifically, this can be accessed from the Security tab: Click Custom Level, then from the Settings list, scroll down to find Navigate sub-frames across different domains, and below that, click the Disable option. As Secunia noted, on systems where IE7 is installed, this setting is now disabled by default.

On one Windows XP-based test system, where we left this setting disabled, IE7 passed the Secunia vulnerability test, both with popup blocking turned on and turned off. On another XP-based system, IE7 failed the Secunia test, but only when popup blocking was turned off. We don't know the reason yet. Also, in our Vista RC2-based Virtual PC environment, IE7 failed the Secunia test, regardless of the popup blocking setting.

Meanwhile, in BetaNews' test, Firefox 1.5 failed the Secunia test, both when popup blocking was engaged, as well as when the site which generated the popup was added to its list of allowed sites. All installations of Firefox 2.0 in Windows XP passed when popup blocking was engaged, though all failed when the popup generating site was made an exception. The only browser among the two brands and different versions to pass both tests was Firefox 2.0 in Vista RC2.

Though the page that testers see when a browser fails the test reports that the code within the page may as well have been malicious, questions could well be raised about that claim. Theoretically, even though the DOM (the document framework) for the popup was circumvented, the same type of restrictions that would apply to scripting on any other page, should apply to the popup as well.

Popup blocking in both Firefox and IE disable their appearance, not filter their content; therefore, disabling popup blocking should not disable filters as well.

A Secunia advisory from March 2005 records that the vulnerability was discovered in Firefox in December 2004, but that Mozilla released a patch for it, for use in Firefox 1.0.1, the following February. No follow-ups were added to the advisory since that time.

Source

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!