New HP Laptop with mismatched memory


Recommended Posts

SO I bought a new dv6t Quad Edition Laptop from HP with 12GB RAM. This thing is a beast, esp after I put in a SSD. However I am wanting to max the RAM out since I do a lot of virtualization work with VMware and because I can.

I opened up the bottom and discovered mismatched RAM. I downloaded CPUID just hoping maybe someone got lazy with the RAM stickers and it confirms my suspicion.

My 8GB stick is PC3-10700 (667MHz) and my 4GB is PC3-12800 (800 Mhz).

Would it be in my best interest to replace both to 12800 or just replace the 4GB to match the 8GB stick? Or should I get a hold of HP and pitch a fit to see if they will correct this. I am not trying to get any upgrade for free, but when I took my A+ a long time ago 10+ years, I could have sworn that mismatched RAM works but it was an avoid if you can thing.

Mods please move this to Hardware hangout... Thanks

I would just replace the 4 gig stick with another 8. I prefer my ram in matched pairs also, but in most cases it won't matter, they'll both clock down to their lowest common denominator speed and timings. You can run memtest86 to verify its all good.

It makes absolutly no difference that they're unmatched. I don't see anything for HP to 'correct'. If the laptop works at the advertised speed and with the advertised amount of RAM there's nothing wrong.

Yes there is a difference, one set of ram is running at a higher frequency than the other. You also have to factor in the timings for each of the sticks too.

I had a quick look on New Egg: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231530 Just have to check your laptop will support the faster spec ram. With a price that cheap, buy two just for peace of mind.

I think for me it would boil down to what was advertised. If the higher speed ram was on what was supposed to be there I would give them a call and see what happens. If the lower speed was supposed to be there then don't worry about it because the higher speed will clock down.

No harm no foul in calling them if they screwed up. If they were wrong and don't do anything I don't think you will be out much because the I think the performance would be hard to notice.

That being said, I would probably replace the slow ram to match the faster....I like the illusion of more speed :D

my hp laptop has mismatched ram (a 2gig and a 4gig). My guess is they have a brand of 1's, 2's, 4's, 8's. Not surprising really. As long as both are set to run at the same speed (they seem fairly close even if not) it makes no difference if they are identical or not. At work we build a lot of computers out of parts and as such we always have different ram (as it's pulled from scrap computers) and it gets mixed and matched and the computers have 0 problems.

I'd replace the 4gig to go up to 16, close it up, and run with it, you aren't going to do any damage, and as you have said it works perfectly well as is. No need to complicate/overreact to something that miniscule. But that's just my opinion.

Yes there is a difference, one set of ram is running at a higher frequency than the other. You also have to factor in the timings for each of the sticks too.

I had a quick look on New Egg: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16820231530 Just have to check your laptop will support the faster spec ram. With a price that cheap, buy two just for peace of mind.

No really there is not, one can clock faster than the other that is the only difference. The system, being as smart as it is, will slow down the faster memory to the slower memory and everything is now on an equal playing field. While one can go faster than the other, doesn't mean it is or allowed to by the system. This has been like this since way back in 286 and 386 computers.

  • Like 1

I bought a laptop that was advertised with having extra RAM. It was an offer from the store in which I bought it from and the ram was made by different manufacturers. No massive issue, it's compatible and it is the same timings/speed in my case.

I'd go with what others are saying, if some of the RAM is of a lower spec than what was advertised with the laptop, contact HP, if some of it is faster than advertised, that's a bonus and I doubt that they'll do anything about it. In that case, just buy some new ram that matches the fastest chip.

I believe with DDR3 the memory controller can handle mismatched RAM as long as the timings match up, but like was mentioned earlier the clock speeds are set at the slower speed. 667Mhz is a pretty low for a higher end laptop. My Compaq which was originally manufactured in 2007 is running at 1066Mhz(also DDR3). Personally I'd send them an email in the off chance it was an actual error and they send you a replacement stick at the 800Mhz. Else you could upgrade to 1066 but I believe that is the max(See PDF, link below).

Best practice recommends matching memory speeds as well as putting the larger size in the first slot for a reason. My laptop actually bugged out when I flipped the memory cards after doing a cleaning and replacing a broken LCD. They were both the same frequency, but one is 2GB and the other 1GB. It ran fine for a few seconds and then the colors went berserk. In an older Dell laptop I worked on someone had ran mismatched frequency RAM and the thing would boot and actually booted but it had so many glitches errors and random bluescreens. It was fine once I pulled wrong frequency RAM. Though it had more problems than just mismatched RAM.

http://h10032.www1.hp.com/ctg/Manual/c01860375.pdf

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Carol, Windows XP is still being used today only in a small capacity. It is still the best OS there is due to its backwards compatibility with other older software, the customization features, and friendly UI, and people often feel that upgrading to newer OSes is cost prohibitive in specialized Industries or developing countries, so the market share as of now is around 0.2%-0.3%
    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      262
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      macoman
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!