Remember When Facebook Wanted Your Phone Number? It's Using It To Sell


Recommended Posts

Since about September, Facebook has offered its advertisers a powerful new way to track its users as they surf the Web: It's called "phone number retargeting." (The move comes separately to Facebook's effort earlier this year to collect its users' mobile phone numbers to prevent security breaches.)

More recently, according to AdExchanger, Facebook has also developed a new "conversion pixel" ? basically a type of tracking device ? within ads displayed on Facebook.

The combination of phone retargeting and conversion pixels theoretically allows advertisers to target you directly with ads and then measure exactly how you respond to them, whether by clicking, ignoring, or buying something from the advertiser's site. The process is anonymous, in that advertisers can't identify you by name. They do know, however, that they're targeting you based on your phone number.

Some advertisers have been doing this kind of thing on other websites for years. But most Facebook users don't know it's going on within Facebook.

The primary reason Facebook prompts users for a mobile phone number is to prevent account hacking. Earlier this year, Facebook began asking every user for a phone number for "security" purposes. Here's what Facebook says about that:

facebook-phone.jpg

Those numbers, it turns out, are NOT being sold to advertisers.*

Rather, Facebook also collects users' phone numbers when they are entered in other parts of a users' account information. Those numbers are then made available to advertisers as part of its new Custom Audience targeting product. "Audiences can be defined by either user email address, Facebook UIDs, or user phone numbers," the product states.

Here's how it works: Let's say you are a member of your local gym. You probably gave the gym your phone number. But then you let your membership lapse, and now the gym wants to persuade you to come back. The gym can cross-reference its list of members' phone numbers with users' phone numbers on Facebook, and serve an ad on the page of any user with a matching number. Suddenly, you're seeing ads that say, "Get 10% off if you rejoin your local gym!"

Advertisers can combine such a campaign with ads that carry a conversion pixel, which will enable a "cookie" to track what you do so that the gym can see how successful its campaign was.

There's a level of privacy built in to the system: Although your phone number will be targeted by ads, the number will be "hashed," meaning that the system disguises it by replacing it with random code, making you anonymous. So the gym might target 100 phone numbers, but it won't know which of those specific people actually responded to the ad (until they pay for a membership online, of course). All the gym will know is that a certain number responded to the ad, and that those users must have been on the original phone list.

*Correction: This item originally said, incorrectly, that security phone numbers were used for advertiser retargeting. The company tells us that these numbers are kept separate and NOT used for that purpose.

http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-phone-number-security-being-sold-to-advertisers-2012-11

So, Facebook are doing nothing wrong and are trying new ways to help them survive and continue offering us a great product? Thanks for letting us know :) I knew that anyway, as I closely follow Facebook news, but it's good that more people are being informed that Facebook aren't actually doing anything wrong with their mobile numbers.

Not surprised.. same reason I won't give Yahoo Mail or GMail my phone number "for security purposes"

You missed the part where it says:

*Correction: This item originally said, incorrectly, that security phone numbers were used for advertiser retargeting. The company tells us that these numbers are kept separate and NOT used for that purpose.

Numbers given to them for security purposes are not handed out...this only happens if you have the number listed on there for general purposes.

I love this, people want a free service and then whine that the said company is using the demographic details they have to target ads. Honestly, I swear people are f-cking clueless as to how such services are free in the first place - as if some eccentric billionaire is bank rolling Facebook for the 'good of humanity' or something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      262
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      92
    5. 5
      macoman
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!