Recommended Posts

463834739.jpg





Developers: BioWare
Publisher: Electronic Arts
Engine: Microsoft Windows: Unreal Engine 3.5, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3: Mass Effect 3 engine (modified UE3)
Platforms: Microsoft Windows, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3
Release Date: March 6, 2012


Description:

Decisions from Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2 will be imported into Mass Effect 3 to keep continuity within the series. Over 1,000 variables will be pulled to shape how players experience the final chapter. Unlike in Mass Effect 2, Commander Shepard will start the game with some powers. The character creator will have more features and hair-styles included than in Mass Effect 2 and players will be able to change appearance and class when importing their character. There will be no origin-story comic for new players to help them make quick decisions without having to play the previous two games. Upon finishing the game, there will be a New Game+ option that allows players to continue playing after the main story ends or start again with their finished Shepard and collect items they missed the first time around. If players achieved a love interest in both Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2, then both previous love interests will be vying for Shepard's attention in Mass Effect 3. This "love triangle" will be resolved by the end of the game.

Locations in Mass Effect 3 will include the salarian homeworld Sur'Kesh, the asari homeworld Thessia, the turian homeworld Palaven, the quarian homeworld Rannoch, a human mining base in a Martian crater, and a giant city on Earth representing the combination of Seattle and Vancouver. Players will also return to Tuchanka - the krogan homeworld - and Illium, as well as the Citadel.

Mass Effect 3 will have more RPG elements than Mass Effect 2. For the first time in the series, players will have skills that start along a single path and then splinter into two branches where they can select only one upgrade or the other along a sequence of possibilities. Players will also be able to customize their weapons with different scopes, mods, barrels and ammo types. There will be 25 weapon mods total - five per weapon type - and each of them will have multiple power levels to collect. The game will include mini-games (although planet scanning is unlikely to return) and Hammerhead and Mako missions.

As of August 23, 2011, BioWare has confirmed the return of previous characters Liara T'Soni, Kaidan Alenko or Ashley Williams, Miranda Lawson, the Illusive Man, Garrus Vakarian, Legion, Samara, Morinth, Tali'Zorah, Urdnot Wrex, Jack, Mordin Solus, David Anderson, Zaeed Massani, Kasumi Goto, Kelly Chambers, Thane Krios, Jacob Taylor and Ambassador Donnell Udina from Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2. Some characters will not return if they were killed at any point during the previous games. The number of characters available as permanent squad mates will be smaller than in Mass Effect 2 for the purposes of deeper relationships and more interesting interplay, including same-sex relationships for both male and female Shepards. BioWare has also confirmed a new character called James Vega. [Source]


Plot:


Mass Effect 3 will begin with Commander Shepard on Earth for trial as a result of events from the Mass Effect 2 DLC pack Arrival. During the trial, Earth is attacked by Reapers. Faced with insurmountable odds, Shepard is forced to flee the planet in order to gather support from alien civilizations and mount a counter-attack while also having to deal with Cerberus, who have decided to turn against him/her. It is possible for Shepard to lose to the Reapers.

In an interview with PSM3 Magazine, Casey Hudson said of the plot, "Mass Effect 3, in simple terms, is a little more like the first game. You're collecting pieces of a story, but the more you investigate and explore these themes, the more the game will unlock and you'll see the bigger picture. In a way, it's more of a traditional story where you're learning about things and the plot changes as you find things out." The game will complete the story of Commander Shepard. [Source]


Features:


 

  • A rich, branching storyline: Experience a sci-fi epic with multiple endings determined by your choices and actions throughout the game.
  • Massive in scope: Battle on many worlds across the galaxy as you unite the ultimate force to take back the Earth before it's too late.
  • Large-scale and intelligent enemies: Battle enormous enemies and take on a smarter type of foe that will consistently challenge your best combat tactics and put you on the edge of your seat.
  • Unlock a customizable arsenal: Tailor each weapon with devastating upgrades including scopes, grips, barrels and dozens of other unique attachments. Each weapon boasts its own powerful impact and visual flair.
  • Unleash death from afar or go toe-to-toe: Customize your soldier and squad to engage the enemy on your terms. A huge variety of weapons, abilities and equipment allow you to combat the enemy in your preferred style of play.

[Source]


Links:



Screenshots:


e3-2011-mass-effect-3-screens-2011060603
mass-effect-3-20110829105242077.jpg
mass-effect-3-20110829105240157.jpg
mass-effect-3-20110829105238541.jpg


Videos:


 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/
Share on other sites

I can't wait for this game. I played the first two games at least a half a dozen times, each. This game probably has my favorite characters and story of any game I've ever played. I cannot wait to see what happens in the third one.

I'm also happy to find out that the co-op play that was just recently announced will not affect the main story in any way. It was created by a completely separate team, and you can still get the full/complete ending to the main story without touching co-op.

That being said, my brother is also a huge fan of the series so I have no doubt we'll play the co-op to death. I'm just glad we can still fully enjoy the game solo.

They only thing that will keep me from playing this game until the DVD ignites is Diablo 3. They're both coming out "around the same time". Sadly, the beginning of next year looks entirely more exciting than the last 6 months of this one. I don't know what I'll do until then...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594372359
Share on other sites

Am I really reading that plot right?

Mass Effect 3 will begin with Commander Shepard on Earth for trial as a result of events from the Mass Effect 2 DLC pack Arrival.

You have to buy paid for extra dlc to understand events that happen in ME3? That is just....stupid. You should never be required to buy paid for dlc to fully understand the storyline of the game. Bioware sees it differently I guess.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594372603
Share on other sites

Am I really reading that plot right?

Mass Effect 3 will begin with Commander Shepard on Earth for trial as a result of events from the Mass Effect 2 DLC pack Arrival.

You have to buy paid for extra dlc to understand events that happen in ME3? That is just....stupid. You should never be required to buy paid for dlc to fully understand the storyline of the game. Bioware sees it differently I guess.

That has been known for a while now. Though, in all honesty, I agree with you. DLC should never be required. However, Arrival is pretty good.

I also remember reading that ME3 will have some type of re-cap movie/intro similar to the PS3 version of ME2, for those who haven't played the DLC. So, at the very least, you won't be completely left in the dark. Though, those who did play the DLC will probably get more out of the experience.

In my opinion, Arrival and Shadow Broker are "required" DLCs for anyone who really loves the series. Shadow Broker is most definitely worth the money. Arrival is too, but to a lesser extent. ME2 It's the only game that I've bought DLC for, and I'm someone who doesn't agree with most DLC practices. If you have some extra money, you really should pick up those DLCs if you like the series.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594372647
Share on other sites

I agree with spacer. My favourite Mass Effect 2 DLC is Lair of the Shadow Broker. The Arrival is also good and it's the one you'll want to get as it bridges the gap between Mass Effect 2 and 3.

Also...

BioWare details Mass Effect 3′s Galaxy at War system

Yep: it’s online. BioWare’s detailed how Mass Effect 3′s four-way co-op will impact the main campaign (optionally), how development affected single-player (it didn’t), and how many Shepards you can have running around (none).

20110830me3.jpg

In a post on the BioWare forums, Chris Priestly revealed that the co-op missions, while not not part of the solo experience, “will have a direct impact on the outcome of the single player campaign, giving players an alternative method of achieving ultimate victory” against the Reapers.

This ability to influence the outcome of the story is called the Galaxy at War system, and will impact your solo campaign’s “Galactic Readiness” level.

The co-op missions apparently form just one part of this system, with “other platforms and interfaces” to be announced soon.

“It is important to note that the system is entirely optional and just another way players can have control over your game experience – it is still possible to achieve the optimal, complete ending of the game in Mass Effect 3 through single-player alone,” Priestly assured readers.

In an extensive FAQ, BioWare addressed common criticisms of the the undetailed multiplayer, commenting that it had gone for co-op over versus modes so that multiplayer “made sense and did not compromise the power of the single player campaign”.

“Our priority and focus with Mass Effect 3 has and always will be to deliver a complete and satisfying single player experience,” the post reads, going on to comment that no development resources were reassigned as a result.

[...]

Source: VG247

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594372669
Share on other sites

I would buy any DLC they come out with for the ME series ... this game is that good.

That being said I cannot wait for this game.

Firewalker DLC was kinda rubbish.

Can't wait for this game to drop. Loved the second one to death!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594374443
Share on other sites

Mass Effect 3 may have as much dialogue as first two games combined

Though the first two offered seemingly endless dialogue choices and character interaction, apparently Mass Effect 3 will dwarf them both.

Mass_Effect_2_Wallpaper_by_zeebow14.jpg

The original Mass Effect reportedly had around 20,000 lines of spoken dialogue, and the second game had about 25,000.

Mass Effect 3 will apparently dwarf both those games, weighing in with a massive 40,000 lines of dialogue. Those of you who like interacting with the side characters of the ME universe should be very happy about this news.

A fan tweeted concerns about the level of Shepherd’s voice volume at an audio designer on the game who replied, “We do our best to keep consistency but it’s tough with 40,000 lines!”

Source: VG247

This is great news. I really hope they add new kinds of dialogue. I missed the interesting conversations I had in the original Mass Effect. The conversations with the Elcor were especially interesting (and funny). :happy:

Also, details on MP:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWaANoSZSzE

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594379561
Share on other sites

Not that I'm complaining or anything but this:

For the first time in the series, players will have skills that start along a single path and then splinter into two branches where they can select only one upgrade or the other along a sequence of possibilities.

Isn't really correct. There were branching power choices in ME2. I'm not sure if this sentence is alluding to there being multiple choices/paths or what, but they did have this "feature" in ME2.

Though, as I said, I'm not complaining. I am all for more RPG elements and "skill trees". The one thing I did not like about ME2 was how far it strayed from ME1's skill/stat/weapon complexity.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594379845
Share on other sites

Not that I'm complaining or anything but this:

Isn't really correct. There were branching power choices in ME2. I'm not sure if this sentence is alluding to there being multiple choices/paths or what, but they did have this "feature" in ME2.

Though, as I said, I'm not complaining. I am all for more RPG elements and "skill trees". The one thing I did not like about ME2 was how far it strayed from ME1's skill/stat/weapon complexity.

Instead of morphing a single time at (4), its said to be able to continue going and can be morphed several times per power later on iirc.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594379855
Share on other sites

Instead of morphing a single time at (4), its said to be able to continue going and can be morphed several times per power later on iirc.

I figured that's what it was, but it's still not a "new" feature to the series. But it should still turn out much better than ME2's skill progression system.

Also, why was the "[Official]" tag removed?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594380245
Share on other sites

I figured that's what it was, but it's still not a "new" feature to the series. But it should still turn out much better than ME2's skill progression system.

Also, why was the "[Official]" tag removed?

It does seem like they're trying to make it look like a new feature. As you said, this was already available in Mass Effect 2. Of course, I'll be happy if they take it a step further by allowing you to further increase an ability (without having to choose a certain path just once).

As for that tag, it was removed in favour of the new tagging system. See here and here.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1031623-mass-effect-3/#findComment-594380359
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!