Recommended Posts

Even with the new evidence, they plan to keep looking, said Nicastro. That's because intergalactic baryons not only fill a gap in scientists' understanding of the universe, but they may also lead to a better understanding of "dark matter," a mysterious and unseen form of matter that has so far only been detected by the gravitational pull it exerts on other bodies in the universe.

They just found Baryons, the building blocks of life. Oxygen Ions + Carbon + Nitrogen etc... They have yet to find dark matter. But that's some pretty good info. (Y)

Wow, thats amazing.  So, what's dark matter?

585410657[/snapback]

Dark Matter

n : (cosmology) a hypothetical form of matter that is believed to make up 90 percent of the matter in the universe; it is invisible (does not absorb or emit light) and does not collide with atomic particles but exerts gravitational force

Dark Matter

n : (cosmology) a hypothetical form of matter that is believed to make up 90 percent of the matter in the universe; it is invisible (does not absorb or emit light) and does not collide with atomic particles but exerts gravitational force

585410682[/snapback]

90%?

why is it so hard to find?

"Whereas baryons account for 4 percent of the total matter and energy in the universe, dark matter is thought to make up 23 percent."

So yeah, they maybe found some dark matter, if that was actually part of the dark matter, but even then, there's undiscovered dark matter? :huh:

As for dark energy, I'd say it's a name given for a force we don't understand. It could be that there isn't any dark energy at all, but our theories are wrong. Same with dark matter btw. We haven't observed it for sure yet, we just assume dark matter is going to be there. With other theories, I guess you could find workaround without the necessity of dark matter to exist? It could be that we simply don't understand gravitational forces and therefore assume there must be tons of strange "dark matter" around us when it's in reality us who're wrong. :)

In layman's terms: Dark matter, which makes up a huge chunk of the universe (up to 90%), is the theoretical "filler" to make everything else we have discovered about the universe fit. We can measure gravitational effects, and we understand the gravitational effects of the matter that we CAN see but there's a whole lot of gravitational forces from something that we CAN'T see. The best example is the expansion of the universe. It was recently discovered that not only is the universe expanding, but it is accelerating. The amount of matter required to exert the necessary gravitational forces that would cause the universe to accelerate outward is about 10 times what we can see and detect. Thus, dark matter.

I've always wondered if anyone took into account simple light and emitted electromagnetic radiation.

You figure, everything in the universe has been 'glowing' since the beginning of time. I imagine a good amount of that energy is lost, 99.9% (completely made up figure) of it never hitting any matter (and recycling the energy).

Sorta like evaporation. If matter and energy are two states, and they can't find most of the matter, its probably because its become energy and escaped quantification.

:shrug:

Pretty cool, was a big subject when I did physics at Uni up till last year.

When it really starts messing with your head is when they tell you that for every positive there is a negative i.e. Anti-matter!

I won't try and elaborate, break out Google if you want to know more.

Dougal.

then how they know it is there

585415535[/snapback]

its like OXYGEN... its INVISIABLE! but we KNOW it is there... but there is a evidence of what oxytgen is made up of... now, say "dark matter" is oxygen for the universe... thats what they have NOW just discovered!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      256
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!