Recommended Posts

The scheme is aimed at cutting accidents involving young people

An insurance company is allowing young motorists to pay less for insurance if they avoid driving at night.

More Than is offering drivers between 18 and 25 40% off if they do not drive between 2300 and 0600. But it will charge ?25 for breaking the "curfew".

Car use is monitored by a device put into the vehicle by the company.

Up to 40% of accidents between 2300 and 0600 involving young drivers result in death or serious injury, compared with 20% at other times, figures show.

'Major issue'

Once installed, the device sends a message to the company whenever the car starts, giving the time and place that the journey started.

A further message is sent when the engine is switched off to confirm the journey has ended.

We need to find more innovative ways of preventing tragic deaths involving young drivers

Mary Williams

Brake

More Than says the policy could save the average young motorist about ?300 a year.

However, BBC News personal finance reporter Richard Scott says drivers who repeatedly break the rules and are charged each time could see their savings wiped out.

More Than also says that by reducing the number of young drivers on the road at night, its initiative could help cut accident rates among young drivers by up to 25%.

Spokesman Bryan Turner said: "High accident rates for young drivers on the roads at night are a major issue and we have been working for some time to come up with a solution to reduce these." Mary Williams, chief executive of road safety charity Brake, has welcomed the initiative. She said: "We need to find more innovative ways of preventing tragic deaths involving young drivers and their passengers on our roads."

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/484019-curfew-for-young-drivers/
Share on other sites

The only issue I can see with it, is when the driver hits 25, and is no longer a 'young driver', they have no expereicne driving on the road at night. Due to this, aren't we only postponing the figures, and not finding a way to make drivers more aware?

You make a valid point, but someone whos 25 would of been (hopfully) driving for a good few years, so by then should have a good feel for driving in general.

As opposed to a new driver who doesnt know much about the roads going stright out at night and driving.

11 is a bit harsh for me, perhaps if it was 12 or 1 then certainly i'd get it.

But it will charge ?25 for breaking the "curfew".

If you are still insured or not is a different matter! i could see lots of complications comming from someone going out in the curfew and bening in a accident.

The tracking device also seems a bit iffy. What if you have a accident going a bit too fast around a unfamiliar corner? can they track that and not payout?

Its the first step to us all being monitored drivers, next Mr Blair will want to get on the idea and charge us for how many miles we use....

I would never accept this type of policy. I absolutely love driving at night. It's just a shame that I get penalised for all the other drivers in my age group. And for the record, I consider myself a safe, sensible driver.

thats life though, statistics show that your more likely to get into an accident....heck all insurance is this way: basically if your neighbors house burns down, it hurts your insurance

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!