A First Look at Firefox 3.0


Recommended Posts

Mozilla has officially released the first public alpha build of Firefox 3.0. Codenamed Gran Paradiso, Firefox 3 includes the new Gecko 1.9 rendering engine which leverages the open source Cairo rendering framework and features heavily refactored reflow algorithms that improve Firefox layout functionality and resolve some long-standing CSS bugs.

The reflow improvements in Gecko 1.9 (included in the latest Gran Paradiso nightly build, but not the alpha release) finally enable Firefox to pass the Acid 2 test, a CSS test case developed by the Web Standards Project to illuminate flaws in HTML/CSS rendering engines. To pass the Acid 2 test, browsers must comply with W3C standards and provide support for a wide variety of features that are considered relevant by web designers. The Acid 2 test has been passed by several other browsers, including Safari, Konqueror, and Opera, but not Internet Explorer. Passing Acid 2 is considered to be a significant milestone in Firefox development.

acidtrip.gif

Left to right: Acid 2 under Firefox 2.0, Firefox 3.0 Alpha 1, and Firefox 3.0 Alpha Minefield (nightly)

Gecko 1.9 also includes a new threading model, support for Cocoa widgets on OS X, and some unit fixes (still under development) that could eventually facilitate a full-page zoom feature like the one found in Opera. Firefox's transition to Cairo is significant. Written in the C programming language, the versatile Cairo graphics library is a vector-based drawing API that supports a wide variety of backends. Cairo can take advantage of hardware acceleration where available and simplifies cross-platform graphics application development by providing an internally consistent and cohesive framework that emphasizes platform-independence. Similar in function to Microsoft's Windows Presentation Foundation (formerly called Avalon) and Apple's Quartz 2D, Cairo has been widely adopted within the open source community and is currently used in numerous open source applications and frameworks including the GTK toolkit and GNOME desktop environment.

Firefox uses Thebes, a C++ wrapper for Cairo. It is hoped that incorporating Cairo into Firefox will decrease the amount of graphics code that needs to be maintained by the Firefox developers, simplifying the Firefox code base and making it easier to further improve Gecko rendering. Cairo opens the door for hardware-accelerated rendering in Firefox using Glitz, Quartz, or an accelerated X server like Xgl. Cairo will also eliminate some awkward rendering bugs, provide new drawing functionality, increase the general quality of anti-aliasing, and improve native SVG support. SVG improvements in Gran Paradiso are already evident. In a recent message posted on the Tango artists mailing list, Tango contributor and Mozilla Visual Identity team member Steven Garrity provides a nice comparison to show how the SVG improvements in Firefox 3 affect the rendering of SVG Tango icons.

svg-in-firefox.png

SVG icon comparison courtesy of Steven Garrity

Although Cairo has a lot to offer, the library itself still has some deficiencies. It is under heavy active development and has improved considerably, but there are still relatively significant performance issues that have to be resolved. Recent benchmarks conducted by Zack Rusin reveal that Cairo is quite a bit slower than Qt 4 in some contexts. A new Bently-Ottman tessellator being developed by Carl Worth and others on the Cairo team could potentially resolve a number of Cairo's performance problems. There are some new bugs in Gecko 1.9, some of which have been introduced into Gecko as a result of the move to Cairo. An assortment of minor font rendering issues have been documented in Gran Paradiso on all three major platforms and compatibility issues have been reported by Linux users who aren't running at least Xorg 7.

Gran Paradiso alpha builds for Windows, OS X, and Linux are available for download from the Firefox FTP as well as the source, but it is important to note that these early alphas are experimental and not intended for regular use. Web developers can use the Gran Paradiso alpha to help ensure that their sites will render properly in Firefox 3, and members of the Mozilla community can use the alpha to help test and debug Firefox. The compressed BZ2 archive containing the Gran Paradiso Alpha 1 binaries and associated files for Linux is about 8 MB, but it expands to about 25 MB after decompression. Before testing Gran Paradiso, you will probably want to back up your Firefox settings directory (~/.mozilla on Linux) so that your configuration data isn't damaged. Those of you that want to test the new reflow improvements can try the latest nightly build, available for download from the Mozilla FTP server. The nightly build, referred to as Minefield, is extremely experimental.

If you want to run two versions of Firefox side-by-side to compare rendering differences, you will have to set the MOZ_NO_REMOTE value to 1 and create a separate Firefox profile. Instructions on how to do that for Windows and Linux can be found here. Scheduled for official release in May, Firefox 3.0 is still in the early stages of development. Aside from the Gecko rendering changes, there are few noticeable differences between Firefox 2.x and the early 3.0 builds. It is not presently clear which features will be developed and included in the official Firefox 3 release, but preliminary plans provide some insight into possible changes.

The Places system, a history and bookmark overhaul that was controversially dropped from Firefox 2 and delayed, is planned for inclusion in Firefox 3. Also planned is a new download manager that could potentially make it possible to resume paused downloads across sessions. Multi-session resume would definitely be a welcome addition. I often use wget for large downloads specifically because Firefox can't resume downloads after a crash. Firefox developers have also discussed possibly integrating support for download acceleration and including a download queue manager that can control the number of simultaneous downloads.

Keybinding configuration has also been a topic of discussion. Since many Firefox extensions use conflicting shortcuts, the need for a centralized shortcut management system has steadily increased. The password manager could also see some improvement, with plans to integrate support for OS X's Keychain and provide better password persistence with the SQLite-based MozStorage engine.

Inclusion of the Cairo-based Gecko 1.9 rendering engine and the new Places system will make Firefox 3 a significant release. Now that Firefox conforms to W3C standards well enough to pass the Acid 2 test, it's time for Firefox developers to focus on stability and resource efficiency. In order to remain competitive, Firefox must be made more reliable and less memory intensive. Supported by a growing community of users and developers, the Firefox web browser has steadily increased in popularity. Firefox market share seems to have hit a plateau at between 11 and 13 percent and it will take creativity and innovation to move Firefox adoption to the next level.

source.pngArs Technica

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/521025-a-first-look-at-firefox-30/
Share on other sites

oooh very nice but why jump to like a 3.0 alpha? they should make like 2.5 atleast. I think they might start playing with numbers to catch up to IE7

Because 3.0 is going to be a huge jump and warrants the new numbering. If you ask me, 3.0 is what 2.0 should have been.

oooh very nice but why jump to like a 3.0 alpha? they should make like 2.5 atleast. I think they might start playing with numbers to catch up to IE7

It's because FF2 and FF3 are on different versions of Gecko (1.8 and 1.9 respectively). Of course, most people will think a 0.1 difference in Gecko versions in insignificant, but in this case, it's not. Switching to cairo for rendering is HUGE. On Linux, it means use of the RENDER extension, or glitz (OpenGL) for hardware-accelerated rendering. On OSX, it means using Quartz instead of Quickdraw (so pages won't look like crap when you up the DPI, and hardware acceleration using Quartz 2D Exterme). On Windows, I'm sure there's something. And you could render pages to PDF, PS, SVG, PNG. All this, practically for free.

Why? The test has no real bearing on real world browsing. Some how, over time, people managed to put too much emphasis on it.

anyone care to explain what "Acid 2 test" is?

Great combination of replies :rofl:
...the Acid 2 test, a CSS test case developed by the Web Standards Project to illuminate flaws in HTML/CSS rendering engines. To pass the Acid 2 test, browsers must comply with W3C standards and provide support for a wide variety of features that are considered relevant by web designers. The Acid 2 test has been passed by several other browsers, including Safari, Konqueror, and Opera, but not Internet Explorer. Passing Acid 2 is considered to be a significant milestone in Firefox development.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_2

Acid2 is a test case designed by the Web Standards Project to identify web page rendering flaws in browsers and authoring tools. It is an updated edition of the original Acid test of 1997.[1]

Acid2 employs certain features of HTML and, more prominently, CSS. The purpose of employing such features is to highlight the problems with browsers that do not display it correctly. The Acid2 test should render correctly on any browser that follows the W3C HTML and CSS 2.0 specifications.

Google (or Wikipedia in this case) work wonders...

As Chris said, Acid 2 is so over hyped at this point that it's almost funny.

I never really noticed many changes in 2.0.

Trust me (or don't), but it will be. Most of the features haven't been rolled into these builds yet. Keep in mind, this is VERY early on in development. This isn't planned for release until mid/late 2007.

A quick explanation for any of you who might be curious why passing Acid 2 is essentially useless right now:

This is a very cool thing for web developers in that it means Firefox v3 is on track to support all kinds of wonderful web standards and features, but it?s not completely rosy.

Ok great, so Firefox v3 will support these very cool standards/features, but, and it?s a Hbuttike> but, this doesn?t mean anything important for the rest of the world. Sure, we can use these cool things, and anyone using Firefox v3 will be able to see and use them, but lets not forget who still holds roughly 90% of the browser market. Oh right, Internet Explorer 7, and it doesn?t even vaguely come close to passing Acid 2, and therefore doesn?t even remotely support any of these wonderful features we could use.

So, it?s a great step in the right direction, but it is virtually useless if the big time players don?t step up and move towards support all of the web standards.

-- Source: My blog entry about this

Is it just me or will Firefox go the Apple route and come up with a "NEW!!!!" update every few months from now on. These things take time... please don't ruin a great browser by making updates that are not required.

:laugh: Cute. You brought Apple into a thread that has nothing to do with them, and made an improper analogy about their OS releases. I applaud you.

Glad it renders Acid 2 properly. Despite what you all think, forcing the browser to render Acid 2 correctly means forcing the browser to render the W3C CSS 2.0 spec correctly. This keeps browsers from straying off for their own "standards." Yea, it has no effect on daily browsing and you can't really take advantage of it because of the ****** that is Internet Explorer, but it still helps in the long run.

Umbrello, it's not just a pixelated smiley. :laugh: It uses tons of CSS 2.0 techniques to render that.

Is it just me or will Firefox go the Apple route and come up with a "NEW!!!!" update every few months from now on. These things take time... please don't ruin a great browser by making updates that are not required.

This is a Alpha, the start of many builds to come. The Final build won't be until around the end of 2007. Don't worry! :)

How hard is it to display a pixelated smiley in a browser such as Firefox? :blink:

If you look at the CSS specifically you'll see how complicated/advanced this code is. It's not nearly as simple as it appears. It's all a matter of spacing, positioning, following certain selectors and rules ...it's quite complicated stuff.

If you look at the CSS specifically you'll see how complicated/advanced this code is. It's not nearly as simple as it appears. It's all a matter of spacing, positioning, following certain selectors and rules ...it's quite complicated stuff.

Ah, understand. But I don't see any difference between the FF 2 and 3 icons. (Except that FF2 is a bit brighter.)

Ah, understand. But I don't see any difference between the FF 2 and 3 icons. (Except that FF2 is a bit brighter.)

It's all about the underlying code. The rendering engine is brand new. The bookmarks/history backend will eventually be all new.

Yes :-D good to see it finally passed.

Now if only IE passed the test so we wouldn't have to pull our hair out anymore when designing sites. Honestly, a lot of ppl should have been fired. In school, you are given a project description and you have to meet the specifications or you fail. In the real world developers are allowed to say screw it to the rules/guidelines?...and not fix the bugs and holes in your code even after YEARS of updating? god such bull****

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!