God or god -> do you capitalize God/god?


Do you capitalize God/god?  

212 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you capitalize God/god?

    • God - I do it religiously
      85
    • God - I do it because it accepted, but dont belive in God
      67
    • god
      60


Recommended Posts

I personally find it a bit insulting as agnostic/atheist to be forced to capitalize god. It seems to infer that god does exist, but every time I hand in a paper to a professor where I do not capitalize it, they mark it up. I find it rather frustrating to be required to write god in a manner that betrays my personal beliefs.

And to the inevitable 'get over it' or 'what diffrence does it make', it does. Its no different from using the N***** word, after all those are just letters right?

akk my poll didn't attach!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/522761-god-or-god-do-you-capitalize-godgod/
Share on other sites

Do you feel that capitalizing the word God means you believe god exists? Just capitalize God for all your papers and then don't capitalize god outside of those particular classes. It's just text.

With that said, I've always thought of it as just a proper noun - "God" is a name, "god" is a type of being, just like "human". Basically, I think it's a grammar thing and not a religious thing... So basically, I agree with your professor :p

Just because I refer to someone in particular (ie. God) doesn't mean I'm affirming their existence or their superiority over anyone (especially myself). If I were to refer to John Doe, do you think I'm envisioning someone specifically? No, I'm more envisioning a description of a person, not the person himself.

Edit: BTW, I believe in "God" ;)

  • Like 3
it is grammatically incorrect to spell the word as god that's why he marks it wrong.

Its because God is supposedly a proper noun (ie: a specific instance of a type of object), but how can a noun be proper if it does not exist?

Furthermore, you only capatlise it when you are talking about a specific god, for example when I talk about God, but not when im talking about god.

Why?

Because God, in that context, is THE god, not a god, it is "his" name, or the name you are using for "him". Therefore it's capitalized. Zeus is a Greek god, one of many, and that particular god's name is Zeus (which is always capitalized), not God.

You capitalize the name God for the same reason you capitalize anyone else's name at all times.

Capitalizing "God" is not a matter of belief or opinion. The Christian "God" is always capitalized, as are pronouns that refer to Him. <--

I'm an atheist, but you're being ridiculous.

Also, it sounds like you have no understanding of your faith (or lack thereof). Atheism and agnosticism are not the same thing.

  • Like 2

I always write god, just like tooth fairy, santa claus etc. since they all fall into the same category....

tooth fairy is a description of a person.

Santa Clause is a persons name

God is a dudes name.

not the same category my friend.

The problem is that when I reference god, I am referencing no god in particular because I don't believe that any particular god nesicarly exists, I reference god as a theology rather then a particular entity.

Capitalizing "God" is not a matter of belief or opinion. The Christian "God" is always capitalized, as are pronouns that refer to Him. <--

I'm an atheist, but you're being ridiculous.

Also, it sounds like you have no understanding of your faith (or lack thereof). Atheism and agnosticism are not the same thing.

I'm an atheist as far as personal gods go, but am open to the possibilities of an impersonal god. To say I believe any pop-god could exist is wrong.

Its also funny too that people say they only do it with the Christian god, because any god of any religion must be capatilized.

I always write god, just like tooth fairy, santa claus etc. since they all fall into the same category....

But Santa Clause is an identity, even though no one fulfills that identity. Children know who the Tooth Fairy is. Everyone knows who "God" is, whether or not they believe in his existence.

And just to note, I'm not in accord with the whole "capitalizing pronouns referring to God" thing... I still write "him" and not "Him" because it looks incorrect to me.

If I created a character in a fiction book the persons name would still be capitalized it wouldn't matter if I made it up or not. The Christian God is a name and therefor a proper noun. The word god doesn't have to be capitalized otherwise. You look foolish if you can't use proper English. You must capitalize Santa doesn't mean you have to believe he exist.

tooth fairy is a description of a person.

Santa Clause is a persons name

God is a dudes name.

not the same category my friend.

They are mythical beings.............that's why they fall into the same category for me.

If I created a character in a fiction book the persons name would still be capitalized it wouldn't matter if I made it up or not. The Christian God is a name and therefor a proper noun. The word god doesn't have to be capitalized otherwise. You look foolish if you can't use proper English. You must capitalize Santa doesn't mean you have to believe he exist.

Exactly! :yes: Exactly...

I fail to see why this is so hard to understand.

in terms of english grammer (which i'm very good at i just don't use it online very often) it's like the word 'mom.' here's an example:

"Say 'Hi' to your mom for me," said the old man to his friend.

"Hi, Mom," said the old man's friend.

basically you capitalize it if you're using it as a name for someone/thing specific (as in "praying to God") but you leave it lowercase if you're referring to the term 'god' in general (as in "praying to a god")

If I created a character in a fiction book the persons name would still be capitalized it wouldn't matter if I made it up or not. The Christian God is a name and therefor a proper noun. The word god doesn't have to be capitalized otherwise. You look foolish if you can't use proper English. You must capitalize Santa doesn't mean you have to believe he exist.

See that too is awkward, for example

"There are so many Thomas' in the world" or "there are so many thomas' in the world"

You always say the first.... I think...

but "There are so many Gods in world" or "There are so many gods in the world"

You always say the latter.

its really not that hard, its just proper grammer, and if your not a fan of proper grammer, do it for respect of the readers.

If its grammatical, then what does respect have to do it. Even your statement seems to imply that the use of 'god' disproves him and isnt just a gross error.

Why should decapitalizing it disprove god, while capitalizing it have nothing to do with its existence?

Edited by lostspyder

Erm, I think you're confused because "god" can be used as an noun (blah, sorry, thanks Quick Shot) and also a proper noun. The Christian god is named God. Hercules is a greek god.

I mean, if my name was Charles and you didn't believe in me, then would my name suddenly be charles? :p

Edited by 5HORiZONS
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!