Recommended Posts

General Information

This release is based on the all-new
AutoPatcher 5.6.
It was made for Windows
Vista 32 and x64
and is independent of the language of Windows Vista. That means that if you're running a 32 bits version of Vista, you'll only see the modules for Vista 32 bits (the same thing for the 64 bits version).

This is the second version, so we will include more stuff as time goes by.

Please provide feedback.

What's included (March 2007)

Green text is stuff thats been added since the last release.

Windows Vista - Critical Updates

KB890830: Malicious Software Removal Tool v1.27

KB929399: Update for Windows Media Format 11 SDK for Windows Vista

KB929399: Update for Windows Media Format 11 SDK for Windows Vista x64 Edition

KB930857: Update for Windows Vista

KB930857: Update for Windows Vista for x64-based Systems

Windows Vista - Recommended updates

KB905866: Update for Windows Mail Junk E-mail Filter [February 2007]

KB905866: Update for Windows Mail Junk E-mail Filter for x64-based Systems [February 2007]

KB928089: Update for Windows Vista

KB928089: Update for Windows Vista for x64-based Systems

KB929735: Update for Windows Vista

KB929735: Update for Windows Vista for x64-based Systems

KB931573: Update for Windows Vista

KB931573: Update for Windows Vista for x64-based Systems

KB932246: Update for Windows Vista

KB932246: Update for Windows Vista for x64-based Systems

Components

Windows Live Messenger 8.1 (ENU only).

Add-ons

Google Toolbar v4.0.1601.3576

Macromedia (Adobe) Flash Player 9.0.28.0 for Internet Explorer

Macromedia (Adobe) Flash Player 9.0.28.0 for Mozilla, Firefox, Opera and Netscape

Macromedia (Adobe) Shockwave Player v10.1.4.020

Sun Java 6 32-bits

Sun Java 6 64-bits (only for Vista x64)

icon11.gifBitTorrent is a P2P system that makes transfering large files (or groups of files) amongst a large group of people easy, fast and efficient. The BitTorrent network is impressive mostly for the speed and reliability with which you get files that have been recently released. As long as a .torrent file has enough people sharing then you can be assured that it will start quickly and maintain a good download speed. Always remember to leave your BitTorrent client open to help distribute the files!

icon13.gifRead the FAQ before installing AutoPatcher

Download Links

You may download AutoPatcher Vista from any of the following mirrors:

Sizes & Hashes

  • March 2007 Full File Size: 74.0 MB (77,609,358 bytes)

    March 2007 2007 Full MD5 Hash:
    75EA680E444DC0770ADB858FB8ED2857

Thanks To

  • raptor
    for making this all possible.

  • Blaze
    for all the great work he's been doing.

  • We would also like to thank those who continue to help with hosting and distribution, along with:
    (old main mirror),
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    , skyypunk, eXplosive, iverson0881, SteelTrepid, Storm, DigitalScar, mlazovjp, iSix, calidude, cpugeniusmv, SilentKnight, Mace68, Nexose Networks, Draganta, Homer, SHUR, allskin, rpaz (Univ. ?vora), Hogie, tkam, Hurmoth, Amnezja.org, Deaper,
    ,
    , PlanetMirror, AusGamer,
    , and
    .

gandolas,

AutoPatcher Team Member

www.autopatcher.com

New Layout by

raptor>

Edited by theblazingangel
changed 'xp' to 'vista'
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/546790-autopatcher-vista-march-2007/
Share on other sites

what happens if i already installed the updates? it is alight to get the green and intallt his autopatcher as well? thanks

(if you're wondering why iwould dosuch a thing, is bcause i wanted to getthe flash 9 to work on IE cuz i tried standalone players and they did'nt work) thanks!

what happens if i already installed the updates? it is alight to get the green and intallt his autopatcher as well? thanks

(if you're wondering why iwould dosuch a thing, is bcause i wanted to getthe flash 9 to work on IE cuz i tried standalone players and they did'nt work) thanks!

AutoPatcher will detect which updates are already installed and deselect them for you. So yes, it's alright :)

Is there any plans to add the office updates as well?, just was thinking if you did that, be even more better. Or would it then be to big?

There are plans for a separate AutoPatcher office, yes.

Also: Torrent for AutoPatcher Vista March Full 2007

There is a free TweakUI tool for Vista:

http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/tweakui-for-vista/

I'm sorry, but that is just crappy! I appreciate the attempt but really, announce it like it really is.....a workaround. It's not a true Vista application. The mention in the blog of TweakVI makes me want to puke also. Providing a "slick" interface for options that are changeable if you dig enough is not the example of a good tool. Maybe their "ultimate" version is good? But I'm not wasting $50 to find out!!

Sorry I'm a bit off topic....

on topic: I can't wait for the new version!! Office updates are going to ROCK!!

KB929399_vista_x64.apm

[DetectionRegistry]

RegistryPath=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\Packages\Package_1_for_KB930857~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.0.1.0

KB929399_vista_x86.apm

[DetectionRegistry]

RegistryPath=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\Packages\Package_1_for_KB930857~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~6.0.1.0

is not correct

use:

[DetectionRegistry]

RegistryPath=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\Packages\Package_1_for_KB929399~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~6.0.1.1

KeyName=CurrentState

KeyValue=7

[DetectionRegistry]

RegistryPath=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\Packages\Package_1_for_KB929399~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~6.0.1.1

KeyName=CurrentState

KeyValue=7

^ Thanks, but the best detection is:

[DetectionRegistry]

RegistryPath=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\Packages\Package_1_for_KB929399~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~6.0.1.1

KeyName=InstallClient

KeyValue=WindowsUpdateAgent

[DetectionRegistry]

RegistryPath=HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\Packages\Package_1_for_KB929399~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.0.1.1

KeyName=InstallClient

KeyValue=WindowsUpdateAgent

The "CurrentState" for detection is not the best choice. I've changed it in all modules and will be right next month. :)

Edited by gandolas
  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!