Microsoft CEO jokes about Yahoo bid, Search users


Recommended Posts

SEATTLE (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp Chief Executive Steve Ballmer may be experiencing a case of bidder's remorse after making an unsolicited $42.3 billion offer to buy Yahoo Inc.

Speaking to a group of nearly 2,000 Microsoft enthusiasts at a technology conference in Seattle, Ballmer asked how many people use Yahoo as their primary Web search engine.

Only a handful of arms went up -- fewer than for Microsoft's Windows Live search. The overwhelming majority raised their hands for Google Inc, which Microsoft is seeking to challenge as an online advertising powerhouse.

After the tepid response for Yahoo's search, Ballmer said jokingly: "Wow! We offered 31 bucks a share."

Yahoo and Microsoft, which rank No. 2 and 3 in Web search respectively, are at a stand-off. Microsoft has said its $31 a share offer is fair, while Yahoo has said the cash-and-stock offer significantly undervalues the company.

source

It's a surprise that this jerk isn't driving the company into ground since he's been alone at the helm.

He isn't? He is. The legacy of his stupidity is only beginning to manifest itself. It's not only Ballmer that's the problem, it's whoever is managing Live. All they do is mindlessly copy Google, such as Live News being the latest example. Microsoft isn't doing anything to offer an alternative or superior product, it offers clones with extra eye candy and proprietary Microsoft crap (e.g. Silverlight) tacked on FOR NO BENEFIT TO USERS.

That is the root of the problem. Ballmer and his gang of thugs aren't concerned about what users want, all they're concerned about is Microsoft stock. If they gave a damn, they'd stop copying Google and Apple and expanding into markets where they offer NO BENEFIT, and concentrated solely on the few products they have that people are stuck with: Windows and Office. Ballmer seems to think the MS OS-Office suite monopoly cannot be defeated, but if MS continues to make any more Vista-like products, if Windows 7 sucks as much as Vista, Ballmer is going to get a very rude awakening by 2010 from Apple, Linux, Google, and VMWare.

And maybe even Yahoo, if MS fails in crushing them.

You know, it's not even MS's monopoly that bothers me. What bothers me is that MS tries to kill off superior products and replace them with it's own Windows flag-branded garbage. When MS can't compete, it buys the competition, or uses it's monopoly to destroy them. What's the benefit to users from all these inferior MS knockoffs that Ballmer is pushing?

He isn't? He is. The legacy of his stupidity is only beginning to manifest itself. It's not only Ballmer that's the problem, it's whoever is managing Live. All they do is mindlessly copy Google, such as Live News being the latest example. Microsoft isn't doing anything to offer an alternative or superior product, it offers clones with extra eye candy and proprietary Microsoft crap (e.g. Silverlight) tacked on FOR NO BENEFIT TO USERS.

That is the root of the problem. Ballmer and his gang of thugs aren't concerned about what users want, all they're concerned about is Microsoft stock. If they gave a damn, they'd stop copying Google and Apple and expanding into markets where they offer NO BENEFIT, and concentrated solely on the few products they have that people are stuck with: Windows and Office. Ballmer seems to think the MS OS-Office suite monopoly cannot be defeated, but if MS continues to make any more Vista-like products, if Windows 7 sucks as much as Vista, Ballmer is going to get a very rude awakening by 2010 from Apple, Linux, Google, and VMWare.

And maybe even Yahoo, if MS fails in crushing them.

You know, it's not even MS's monopoly that bothers me. What bothers me is that MS tries to kill off superior products and replace them with it's own Windows flag-branded garbage. When MS can't compete, it buys the competition, or uses it's monopoly to destroy them. What's the benefit to users from all these inferior MS knockoffs that Ballmer is pushing?

That has to be the funniest rant I've ever read. You obviously know very little about what Microsoft is doing. But don't listen to me, I'm a Microsoft newsposter, so I'm biased anyway ;)

I dunno, I switched from Vista to OSX...its a nice scene change, But I honestly cant say I have any less problems.

Hell after the new Safari 3.1.1(osx) update the machine locked up shutting down.

He isn't? He is. The legacy of his stupidity is only beginning to manifest itself. It's not only Ballmer that's the problem, it's whoever is managing Live. All they do is mindlessly copy Google, such as Live News being the latest example. Microsoft isn't doing anything to offer an alternative or superior product, it offers clones with extra eye candy and proprietary Microsoft crap (e.g. Silverlight) tacked on FOR NO BENEFIT TO USERS.

That is the root of the problem. Ballmer and his gang of thugs aren't concerned about what users want, all they're concerned about is Microsoft stock. If they gave a damn, they'd stop copying Google and Apple and expanding into markets where they offer NO BENEFIT, and concentrated solely on the few products they have that people are stuck with: Windows and Office. Ballmer seems to think the MS OS-Office suite monopoly cannot be defeated, but if MS continues to make any more Vista-like products, if Windows 7 sucks as much as Vista, Ballmer is going to get a very rude awakening by 2010 from Apple, Linux, Google, and VMWare.

And maybe even Yahoo, if MS fails in crushing them.

You know, it's not even MS's monopoly that bothers me. What bothers me is that MS tries to kill off superior products and replace them with it's own Windows flag-branded garbage. When MS can't compete, it buys the competition, or uses it's monopoly to destroy them. What's the benefit to users from all these inferior MS knockoffs that Ballmer is pushing?

+1

Instead of saying Ballmer is a lunatic, why not explain why, I really interested in how he is any worse or better than Bill Gates at running Microsoft other than coming off as a mad man.

On another note, I really hate how lots of Microsoft services have different menu bars. Live services and MSN are suppose to different I know but even their services don't go together in any appealing way. Go to Live Search, then look at Live maps, Live Spaces, MSN, Hotmail. They are all over the place.

Ballmer seems to think the MS OS-Office suite monopoly cannot be defeated, but if MS continues to make any more Vista-like products, if Windows 7 sucks as much as Vista, Ballmer is going to get a very rude awakening by 2010 from Apple, Linux, Google, and VMWare.

Vista is bad?

iWonder what MS would be like if Jobs took the helm. :whistle:

It would be on the verge of bankruptcy before a more successful company cuts them a cheque. Then they would ridicule that company and then hypocritically accuse them of stealing ideas.

God bless Steve Jobs and Jonathan Ives.

iWonder what MS would be like if Jobs took the helm. :whistle:

Why people think Apple is the biggest threat to Microsoft?

Has anyone actually seen Balmer throwing chairs when the iPhone got released? He just laughed!

Let's see you do better.

I doubt someone can throw chairs further. Your point is valid, and I'm 100% with you.

That's nice since they aren't one.

Windows is not a monopoly? Holy gee, everyone type rm -rf / !

Edited by Azmodan
Riiiight, except Steve Jobs wasn't with Apple during that time. Apple's return to success only started after Jobs returned. Congratulations on not knowing what you're talking about though.

I think you need to read some instead.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!