Swapping chicken pox-infected lollipops illegal


Recommended Posts

WTF :s

NASHVILLE (Reuters) - A federal prosecutor is warning parents against trading chicken pox-laced lollipops by mail in what authorities describe as misguided attempts to expose their children to the virus to build immunity later in life.

The warning came after media reports surfaced about a multi-state ring of parents, wary of vaccinations that prevent the disease, who were swapping lollipops licked by a sick child in a modern day incarnation of a chicken pox party.

In those so-called parties, parents purposely put sick children together with healthy children in order to spread the ailment and build immunity without having the children vaccinated. This new form of party shares the disease anonymously and long-distance.

"Sending a virus or disease through the U.S. mail (and private carriers) is illegal. It doesn't matter if it crosses state lines," said David Boling, public information officer for the Attorney in Nashville.

"Also, it is against federal law to adulterate or tamper with consumer products, such as candy."

Boling said the issue came to light after a television "news report out of Phoenix that involved a Nashville woman that was shipping and receiving adulterated products."

Sending chicken pox-infected lollipops, swabs or vials of saliva to parents who want to infect their children and avoid vaccinations is not only illegal, it can be lethal, said Dr. Tim Jones, Tennessee's state epidemiologist.

"They are putting at risk the people around them," said Jones, commenting on a controversy that has sparked anger in both the medical and legal communities.

An epidemiologist for the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta agrees. "It's an incredibly bad idea for a variety of reasons," said Dr. Rafael Harpaz, of the CDC's Division of Viral Diseases.

The transport and sale of contaminated items has been linked to a Facebook group called "Find a Pox Party in Your Area," which helps people anonymously arrange for the swapping and sale of contaminated items.

"There are a substantial number of people involved in it," Boling said, referring to the ring.

Nashville-based U.S. Attorney Jerry Martin has been outspoken on the matter because he wants to warn "folks that want to continue to engage in this kind of activity that they are certainly exposing themselves to criminal prosecution," said Boling, who would "neither confirm (nor) deny existence of an investigation."

POX PARTIES

Jones said old-fashioned "pox parties" were bad enough, but shipping items to infect children "is utterly inexcusable. In this case, these are people who are buying and selling infected or contaminated body fluids from complete strangers."

"There are a bunch of things wrong with this," he said, adding that parents could also be inadvertently giving their children items contaminated with influenza or hepatitis, in addition to chicken pox.

CDC's Harpaz said one major issue is that giving children the chicken pox instead of a vaccine could be a fatal mistake.

"Before the vaccine was licensed, there were in the order of 100 kids (in the U.S.) who died of chicken pox per year. Now there are very few among vaccinated children... It's kind of like playing Russian roulette with your child."

In addition to exposing children to chicken pox, those who have it are more susceptible to getting shingles later in life than are vaccinated children, Harpaz said.

"The idea that it's safer to give your kid the infection than it is to immunize them is just wrong, completely misguided and puts your child at unnecessary risk," said Tennessee epidemiologist Jones.

First of all, he said, the vaccine is safe, while those who give the children the disease "are putting at risk people around them. There may be people they could infect that don't have a choice, who can't take the vaccine."

The CDC's Harpaz said symptoms of chicken pox aren't noticeable for "10 days to 21 days when you are exposed." But that doesn't mean children aren't contagious.

Children taking chemotherapy or other medications that affect the immune system are among those who can't take the vaccine and would be at risk if exposed to infected children.

"You could infect them and kill them," said Jones. "That's murder."

http://news.yahoo.com/swapping-chicken-pox-infected-lollipops-illegal-200633795.html

I'm not sure if it's child abuse and it seems like the ban on posting the virus through the mail is (quite rightly) designed to protect adults who may not be immune.

By way of comparison, the vaccine isn't routinely administered to children here in the UK because it's not considered necessary. Most children contract the virus naturally (or through the sort of "parties" mentioned above) and it's not that big a deal. Here's the official guidance:

http://www.nhs.uk/chq/pages/1032.aspx?categoryid=62&subcategoryid=63

Although I hope the parents involved had the best of intentions, it does seem stupid to be deliberately sending viruses in the mail.

  • Like 1

I`m sure people over here (UK) have chicken pox parties - not child abuse at all, but if your child does not catch it when they are young, and catch it in adult life, it can be extremely dangerous to them.

So exposing them early on gets it out of the way - but letting your kid suck a lollipop you got in the mail that some other kid(s) had already been slavering all over is pretty rank

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...

All thanks to one or two stupid reports that "prove" vaccinations are bad for your child, and have a chance of causing autism.

Since then, no matter how many reports have come out that completely dismantle the previous ones, droves of retarded, paranoid parents subject their kids to "chicken pox parties" and stuff like this, so that they don't have to get the vaccine.

Yay for human stupidity.

Huh?

You guys are kidding me right?

I had chicken pox when I was a kid, hell millions of people have been having pox-parties for decades in the UK and I suspect the majority are for the better now. While I agree posting lollies is a bad way to do it, exposing children to the virus when they are young (when most kids get it anyway!) could very well save their life in the future.

Do you guys even know how dangerous chicken-pox is for adults?

If they have a vaccine these days then that is great no need to infect kids with pox-parties. I am sure when I was a id, the only vaccination was to get the infection. However, reports will always find a link. If you look at data hard enough, you can find a link with anything.

This is a great example of the state telling people how to run their lives and how to parent properly. The best parenting advice comes from your own parents.

Let's look at this another way... kids in the 1900's were fairly good. Kids in 2000 aren't that great.

The more governments stick their noses in, the worse society gets. Sometimes they get it right, sometimes... not quite so.

This will still go on regardless of what the law is, so now makes the government look like they have little power.

Please Note: I am from the UK. Post number 4 explains how our culture is.

How dare you Mr Spoon don't you know that making kids sick is bad. How dare you advocate the harming of our little kiddiewinks.

Even if their immune system can deal with it much better and getting it as an adult could leave you scarred and infertile and dead and other consequences kids aren't at risk of.

How dare you use a reasoned argument like this. Won't someone please think of the children and their poor little fevered brows.

All the parents who protect Junior will be in for a shock. When the kids grow up they can either get is adults and end up infertile or dead. Alternatively they may even have kids, catch it off them and then end up dead. Leaving their grandchildren parent less.

Yes much better than making a few kids sick.

All thanks to one or two stupid reports that "prove" vaccinations are bad for your child, and have a chance of causing autism.

Since then, no matter how many reports have come out that completely dismantle the previous ones, droves of retarded, paranoid parents subject their kids to "chicken pox parties" and stuff like this, so that they don't have to get the vaccine.

Yay for human stupidity.

Oh and vaccines can be bad for anyone. Every government puts aside money to cover vaccine damage claims (read up on this to find out more). However the risk of this is much, much, much less than the risks from the disease in question. Otherwise why bother to vaccinate. Unfortunately stupid parents use this kind of thing (and the whole autism stuff) as an argument against vaccinations as a whole.

However they will all soon die from diseases everyone else is vaccinated against. So it will all work out.

  • Like 1

I`m sure people over here (UK) have chicken pox parties - not child abuse at all, but if your child does not catch it when they are young, and catch it in adult life, it can be extremely dangerous to them.

So exposing them early on gets it out of the way - but letting your kid suck a lollipop you got in the mail that some other kid(s) had already been slavering all over is pretty rank

The problem is that there is really no reason to not get the vacination.

Giving kids chicken pox is NOT a good idea. Besides the illness itself they can end up with scarring, a small percentage die, and later in life up to 20% can develop a painful disorder called shingles - a reactivation of the virus which has been hiding in the nervous system. Getting the vaccine is a far better way to go.

You only get tiny scars if you pop or burst the pox :p

I have a few on my body but they aren't really noticable.

Strange how different our cultures are. I'm starting to see it more and more these days what with the cash machine post and now this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Threads scales past half a billion users, brings deeper community and feed controls by Fiza Ali Meta has announced Threads crossing a major milestone of 500 million monthly active users. And, at the heart of this growth sits something simple: communities. From books to basketball, parenting to music, Threads says its rise has been powered by people clustering around shared interests and, in turn, giving the platform its identity. In response, the platform is expanding its Communities feature beyond beta and introducing a set of new tools designed to make participation easier and more engaging. A redesigned Communities Hub will now appear in the main navigation menu, allowing users to jump between groups without leaving their feed. Each community will also receive a distinct Community Icon, giving them clearer visual identity and making them easier to recognise across the platform. Then there’s Community Progress, which is a kind of live gauge showing how close a topic is to becoming a full-fledged community, alongside guidance on how users can contribute to its development. In addition, Meta is also expanding its Community Champions programme, recognising more users who actively contribute to community engagement. And then things go more local; Local Communities is already available in 100 countries, including North America, South America, Asia, and Europe but are now rolling out with native-language tags starting in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. The platform is also expanding Live Chats to more communities in the coming weeks, adding features such as co-hosting and the ability to quote moments directly into users’ feeds. Beyond communities, Meta is tightening the loop between users and their feeds. Earlier this year came "Dear Algo," a feature that lets people tell Threads what they want more or less of. Now it’s being paired with a new tool, "Your Algo." It allows people to adjust how frequently certain topics appear, with options lasting one, three, or seven days. Meta says these preferences remain private and can be managed alongside “Dear Algo” in a unified settings hub. The rollout begins in the US, Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand. Finally, the company says these changes are part of an ongoing effort to refine Threads based on user feedback and that further updates will continue as the platform evolves.
    • You pay just $100 per TB with this rare 4TB PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD deal by Sayan Sen SSDs and GPUs are incredibly hard to get nowadays due to high pricing. Discounts are quite rare which is why we report on them as soon as we spot a good deal. For example AMD's new 9070 GRE was finally up for sale at a very good price of just $500 thanks to a special coupon. Sadly that deal is gone but if you happen to be looking for a 4TB NVMe SSD and can spend around $400 there is a really good offer on sale that you should not miss out on as TeamGroup's 4TB G50 model is on sale for that that price which means you are only paying $100 per TB, a very good deal in the current market (purchase link under the specs table down below). The TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe SSD is a PCIe Gen4 drive and as such it promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 5,000 MB/s, helping accelerate game loading, file transfers, and everyday computing tasks. Since this is a 4TB drive you can use it for a gaming library to take advantage of things like DirectStorage. The SSD features an InnoGrit controller and SLC caching technology to support consistent performance. An ultra-thin, patented graphene heatsink is included to aid in heat dissipation. Get it at the link below: Team Group T-FORCE G50 4TB Internal SSD (TM8FFE004T0C129): $449.99 + $50 off w/ promo code SSF69668, limited offer => $39.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I agree. I also think Phil stayed too long. They should definitely fire whoever thought all a console platform needed was Call of Duty, Elder Scrolls, and Fallout to survive. Asha and crew are still saying they need more Elder Scrolls and Fallout games. They simply don't get it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!