[NBA] Crawford headed to New York

By Greenstein
in The Sporting Arena

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Okay, I think I am the one and only Knicks fan here on Neowin (easily watched over 60 regular season games this season), so with that being said, I do not think the Bulls even came close to getting the better deal on this trade like everyone has said... I think both teams got what they were looking for and neither came out better than the other... Sure the bulls got 4 players for 2, but when you look at those players...

? Frank Williams - out of the 4, the one I am not crazy about leaving. Damn good, solid Point Guard who has a bright future. But still his immediate playing time was limited to none being Marbury's reserve.

? Mutombo - Yes he is Mutombo, finger waiving and all, but he is Old, and only getting older. With the rumors and likelihood Dampier will be a Knick, no need for Mutombo.

? Harrington - A good all around player, soft touch for Big Man, Still barely saw any playing time as a Knick, and Kurt Thomas is the favored Knick in this position, for good reason. Also the Knicks were overloaded in this position: Nazr Mohammed showed lots of promise last season, and people are also forgetting (at least for now unless he is traded) about Tim Thomas.

? Cezary Trybanski - WHO??? Never saw him play as a Knick so I wont miss him not being a Knick.

So although there were 4 players involved, the Knicks got Crawford whose average points per game equals all 4 of those players traded. And the players traded by the Knicks were not getting much playing time, if none at all, with the exception of Mutumbo, so this is actually a good trade for both teams when all is said and done.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By ikjadoon · Posted

      It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By ikjadoon · Posted

      Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By ikjadoon · Posted

      I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all

      By ikjadoon · Posted

      It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Euro-Office must default to ODF to be considered "genuinely European", LibreOffice argues

      By Danielx64 · Posted

      Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!