New version of starforce...


Recommended Posts

Not sure if this has already been posted, but here it is anyway...

This latest identified threat by Futuremark is one that relates to a driver being installed on your computer that gains RING0 access (the highest level of access to your computer). The installation requires Administrator level access to install the driver, which runs all of the time regardless of whether or not you're playing a game with Starforce DRM.

With such a high level of processor access (sharing the same levels the operating system enjoys), the Starforce driver can do anything to your computer at any time. This very ability is demonstrated, since the Starforce driver will force a reboot (not a shutdown) when it thinks it has discovered suspicious activity related to copying. The reboot occurs instantly, and any and all unsaved data could be lost.

In addition, Starforce removes the DPM readings (Data Protection Manager) which must be present on many other non-Starforce protected games, setting the stage for a chain of system events, which basically make it impossible to make even a usable backup copy of your favorite game. Starforce can also block access to some other drivers, requiring certain hardware devices to run in PIO mode (Programmed Input/Output), which results in a lot of overhead for the CPU and a slowing down of your system.

Source/Link:

http://www.techamok.com/?pid=297

Update:

Its been confirmed by futuremark that they have not carried out any investigations into starforce themselves, it appears that the information came from members of futuremarks forums.

More info here:

http://www.futuremark.com/news/?newsarticl...0603/2006032104

Edited by ReAnimation
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/444707-new-version-of-starforce/
Share on other sites

Nothing but pure Virus/Trojan

StarForce give us a break and go find another field of practice, cause you guys have no clue about computers.

I concur 100%

the makers of this crap should be disallowed to ever touch a computer again. I understand the problem of piracy but when that protection itself transcends into other areas of computing, causing instantaneous reboots, data loss, slowdowns, etc, it should be considered completely illegal. Its pathetic that they can do all this just to protect something.

If I was working on a big PHP project like i have been lately and it rebooted me and I lost all of my code (yes, I save often but you can't save constantly), i'm sure they'd be getting plenty of heat and possibly a personal visit from myself. I hate companies like this that focus on making someones computer a ticking timebomb :angry:

How the hell is this legal?

So what if it makes a mistake while you burn a dvd with files named like the games or something and it just reboots your PC and you lose a lot of important work? Would they compensate you?

It also blocks other drivers, doesn't Microsoft not like this sort of behaviour written into drivers? I'm sure I read a page about having to follow certain rules when writing drivers.

It'll just be cracked. Simple.

saying that, only need some idiot to find an exploit and make a virus and causes havok.

So true, a starforce patch aka ultimate virus :/

Starforce just needs to go away. if they only gave me ring0 acces to their stuff :shiftyninja:

i would delete everything

yeah, it will be cracked by the people who want to pirate games, and know how to.

For average Joe, who just wants to save his homework on a disc, something screwy will happen and his computer will reboot. So, he'll think he has a virus, and take the computer to the BestBuy geek squad who will charge him like $150 to fix it.

It is really getting out of hand. I dont believe that Piracy hurts game sales. The people who Pirate the game, were not going to buy it anyway. The same with music.

Millions of people probably downloaded stupid songs like "The Dukes of Hazard Theme Song". I feel confident that none of them were going to buy it. Ever

Starforce is very intrusive. I hope that Microsoft treats this the same as they did with Sony's rootkit thing

Someone is going to lose some of there computer data over some starforce mistake/hiccup, and sue the games company which has implemented starforce on there game, the games company will lose the suit and starforce will be avoided by every games company from then on.

Now we just have to wait for these chain of events to unfold. I hope its EA who get burned.

If they could 100% guarantee that it would not affect everyday use, then I wouldn't have an issue, as I dont pirate games.

But, one thing I have done (and love) is create a virtual drive that has battlefield 2 loaded on it. This allows me to play the game, with the disc. I have the disc, and a CD-Key. The game is mine, and I still have the receipt. I should be allowed to run the game however I want. I have many games, and on any given night, we coud play between 10 different games. I hate searching for discs.

I have trackmania, so I assume that Starforce is installed. This did not, however, affect my battlefield 2 game. But, i suspect that if I installed Starforce before making the game image, then it may not have worked.

So, I have issues with that.

I just took a swing around there forums and wow... lol there are literally hundreds of users all complaining of the same issues with StarForce.

Main problems from what I can see.

Non-working drives while/after using StarForce

Burning programs failing to burn any more

BSODS when trying to do the above ^

Devices reverting to PIO causing failed CD/DVD burns.

Games not working and telling people to use different [compatible] optical drives.

I am glad none of my games include this evasive copy protection.

I just took a swing around there forums and wow... lol there are literally hundreds of users all complaining of the same issues with StarForce.

Main problems from what I can see.

Non-working drives while/after using StarForce

Burning programs failing to burn any more

BSODS when trying to do the above ^

Devices reverting to PIO causing failed CD/DVD burns.

Games not working and telling people to use different [compatible] optical drives.

I am glad none of my games include this evasive copy protection.

Except for Trackmania Nations (IF) you have that.

It sounds terrible for the fact they are letting this Malware pour out onto your system to damage other hardware devices and BSODS. disgusting behaviour.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Umm, read my answer again! If you have something to add or contribute, feel free. Otherwise my point was that you apparently dont want faster updates... so you want slower updates by process of elimination. If you have something to contribute, meaningful answers are better.
    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!