Recommended Posts

I've officially had it. I've been using FireFox, Opera, and IE all for awhile now, and I finally went over the edge with the 'fox. All browsers have their evils, but this one just keeps finding ways to bug me. I'm planning on posting this as an article on my personal space, but first I want to see if I can get any non-trollish feedback.

And I'm sure I'll think up more items to add as I sit here, so I may edit as I go.

Moderator Note: This is not an anti-FF troll, nor a pro-whatever troll. I'm genuinely PO'd, and I'm writing to back up my feelings with documentation, and to share my experiences.

Performance/Memory: It?s no secret; FireFox uses more memory than the average elephant has to offer. The fanboys and even developers will come up with various excuses for the massive memory usage: everything from ?it?s a feature!? to ?who cares, my system has 10tb of ram!.? Shoddy programming is shoddy programming people. If the rest of the browsers on earth can open three web pages in less than 75 megs of ram, FireFox should be able The Developersvelopers: I?ve dabbled in several open source projects around the web, and I know a fair share of programming. I?m no Linus Torvalds, but I know my way around a source file. And I can say, without hesitation, that I find the FireFox developers somewhere between annoying and downright offensive. From my experience on the bugzilla, they are a very elitist, holier-than-thou group. Ideas deemed unworthy are often outright insulted, and they?re quite rude to people who are merely offering ideas, or even assistance. If you?re not in their circle, you?re not worthy of their time. I think the lack of patches being submitted by 3rd parties speaks for itself. If you want to see a successful group of OSS developers, go browse the Linux kernel mailing lists. That lot knows how to work with peoBug/request handlingg/request handling: In addition to the above, they show no decent review process for bugs and feature requests. All it takes is one dev with a hangover to read your request and WONTFIX it into the abyss. I?ve offered several requests, a few of which received support from several other users via votes and posts. The process is always the same: the request stagnates for a year or two, after which a WONTFIX is fired like a sniper shot with no discussion, and usually no more than a sentence of explanation. You could argue that maybe my ideas just were bad from the go, but I?ll say this: at least a couple were for common features in most other web Fanboysable today.

Fanboys: This one?s plain and simple: FireFox fanboys definitely suck. You won?t hear me promote any alternative browser here, because quite simply each has its merits and problems, and anyone who tells you otherwise is a biased zealot. Fanboys are annoying no matter what they promote, however FireFox has managed to spawn one of the more rabid followings of today?s age. These are the people who blindly attack other browsers, even if they?ve never used them, and will never admit to FireFox having a single flaw. So what if it?s using a gig of ram? That?s why systems today can have multiple gigs installed! There are some times in life where people just need to keep their opinions to themselves; two that comeHypocrisyon and web browsers.

Hypocrisy: Since the beginning, the FireFox team has made a big deal out of emphasizing that the actual FireFox web browser will be a minimal core, and that all features should be extensions. Well no sooner do they gain some market share and recognition do they throw their own rules out the window and start adding in ?features? that have nothing to do with the core browsing experience. One perfect example: a new feature in the upcoming 2.0 release is a spellchecker for web forms. Since when is spellchecking a core requirement of anything beyond a word processor? This feature screams ?extension,? and I know that personally, I don?t need any of these ?features? causing FireFox to use even more memory than it does already. But hey, it still makes a good excusExtensionsr peoples suggestions, doesn?t it?

Extensions: Extensions are a good thing, in theory. A system that allows anyone to extend functionality of the core sounds very promising. The problem is extensions are more often than not written by people in their spare time with mixed levels of programming experience and very limited quality control. The result is often buggy extensions that can produce a host of problems during the browsing experience: everything from memory leaks, to broken web pages, and browser crashes. The popular adblock series was infamous for big memory leaks. It took me a long time to figure out that my tabmix extension was causing certain javascripts to unexplainably stop working (which to date has not been addressed). Add in the fact that each minor version upgrade seems to break all your extensions, and the whole thing is suddenly looking much less attractive. Some browsers out there offer many of the features that people need to use tens of extensions toFocusand they do it with equal or less memory.

Focus: The direction of the development is deplorable. It?s a fairly easy task to find valid bugs in the bugzilla dating back several years! And yet new releases are focusing on adding new features! It?s not a complicated concept guys: fixCompatibilityy wrote before writing more new code.

Compatibility: A low blow? Maybe, but the list wouldn?t be complete without it. Mozilla browsers seem to be infamously strict with their code compliance, and there are still plenty of corporate intranets that won?t work with it. Of course, you can always place the blame for this gripe on the web developers, but the bottom line is, when choosing a web browser, this one doesn?t always ?just work.? Oh, and how?s that Acid2 test working for you?

Edited by fred666
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/468616-why-firefox-isnt-for-me/
Share on other sites

Performance/Memory: Yes, I agree it sucks. It should improve and I hope it does

The Developers/Fanboys: Yes!!! Lets all slam firefox because of some pain in the arse developers and/or fanboys. Granted some of them suck, but its unfair to judge a product based upon avid users of that products.

Hypocrisy: Go download an older version then. If all you want is minimal. You must realize at some point, besides bug fixes their is nothing they can do. You don't think AOL pays some of these developers to play WoW or something do you?

Extensions: do you understand OSS. These programmers in their free time try to create something for you. Yet you complain.

Focus: Subjective to interpretation as is almost everything. Any other complaints today?

Remember this is still OSS. If you don't like it, no one is forcing you to use it. And quite frankly, your being no better than a fanboy. No need to slam a program you dont like. If you dislike it so incredibly much, why did you waster precious time complaining. Perhaps use another browser?

I agree with your points. You seem a bit bitter about the WONTFIX stuff but then I've never bothered to submit anything for bug fixing.

What I like about Firefox:

Fairly quick development cycle (I'm testing Minefield/Firefox 3.0 on another box).

Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac and others)

Small footprint + extensions is a good idea (even Minefield with spell checking still is less than a 6MB download)

More secure than some other browsers (in terms of spyware/adware getting installed without your knowledge)

The NoScript extension (which I couldn't live without)

It's free of cost and free of ads

I generally keep my Firefox fairly basic (not too many extensions and a simple theme) but some people have some pretty interesting looks installed.

So basically, I do agree that it has flaws but I use it anyway.

The Developers/Fanboys: Yes!!! Lets all slam firefox because of some pain in the arse developers and/or fanboys. Granted some of them suck, but its unfair to judge a product based upon avid users of that products.

The whole benefit of open source is the emphasis on open. When the developers are as closed minded as those of closed source products, how much do we really benefit?

Hypocrisy: Go download an older version then. If all you want is minimal. You must realize at some point, besides bug fixes their is nothing they can do. You don't think AOL pays some of these developers to play WoW or something do you?

Older versions are no good: clearly not only more bugs, but FF has had scads of security issues. One of the other selling points of firefox is security: hardly something their old versions really offer. And as I said, they have bugs dating back years. They have plenty to keep them busy fixing their own code.

Extensions: do you understand OSS. These programmers in their free time try to create something for you. Yet you complain.

Opera, Maxthon, etc also created these same features for me, and their versions use half the memory and don't mangle nearly as many websites. You call it complaining, I call it criticism of the production model.

Focus: Subjective to interpretation as is almost everything. Any other complaints today?

Remember this is still OSS. If you don't like it, no one is forcing you to use it. And quite frankly, your being no better than a fanboy. No need to slam a program you dont like. If you dislike it so incredibly much, why did you waster precious time complaining. Perhaps use another browser?

A fanboy blindly promotes a product, I'm not promoting anything, and there's certainly more than one alternative in this game. I'm simply putting a counter argument to some of the blind hype out there.

And unless i'm mistaken. You've started a similar thread before. Why waste the time?

Did I? I don't recall it, though I do rant in other threads occasionally. Anyway, this particular set is for my personal site shortly.

With a title like "Why Firefox Sucks" you are trolling, it doesn't matter if you say you are or not. How about, "Why Firefox isn't for me"?

Got your attention though, didn't it? :shiftyninja:

woohoo ... Just a useful tip when it comes to posting here at Neowin:

post-32407-1149902837.jpg

I'm supposed to search for other people who've read my mind and already posted my thoughts for me? What...? :wacko:

How about you assist programming this browser then. Assuming that is you have the skills necessary. Then you can say your helping change the attitude of some developers.

Yes, your right older versions are insecure and perhaps undesirable.

Ok you want maxthon go ahead. If its better for you.

I did not say you were a fanboy. I implied you were annoying like one. Whats the opposite of fanboy? I don't want to use hater but I guess thats it. Okay, stark criticism of their production model. That's fine you have the right to your opinion. Just realize nothing, or nobody is perfect.

Shocked you saw that but yes your right. My apologies you have not started a thread like this before. I thought you had because your original quote looked striking similar to another ranting thread with much of the same points as yours.

And as much as the thread title got the attention of us. It is still trolling.

Regards. Kudos to your calm demeanor and not ranting or acting immature. That is in all seriousness.

Firefox just feels heavy, slow and bulky to me when browsing with it.

Maxthon feels light, thin, crisp and "perky" or.. fast.

That's why I use it. I guess it's a mental thing.

According to FireFoxMyths.com, it's not just mental. They post links to some test results where FF was one of the internet's slower browsers in many benchmarks. I also get the impression that the use of a cross-platform GUI is causing performance penalties and that sluggish feeling, because I notice it too.

With a title like "Why Firefox Sucks" you are trolling, it doesn't matter if you say you are or not. How about, "Why Firefox isn't for me"?

Agreed, title is very trollish like. I like how most of your points have nothing to do with the product. What do the actions of the the developers have to do with it? What does bug reporting have to do with it? What do fanboys have to do with it? What do THIRD-PARTY extensions have to do with it? What does the "focus" have to do with it? For a topic with the title "Why Firefox Sucks", you don't talk about the product very much.

[Thread Title Edited]

Fred has successfully modded my bitterness. :D

I like how most of your points have nothing to do with the product. What do the actions of the the developers have to do with it? What does bug reporting have to do with it? What do fanboys have to do with it? What do THIRD-PARTY extensions have to do with it? What does the "focus" have to do with it? For a topic with the title "Why Firefox Sucks", you don't talk about the product very much.

Are you serious? The entire rant is about the product... The developers produce it, the bugs are bugs in it, the focus is the future of the product, and the 3rd party extensions are what make it competitive. I don't see how you can possibly disassociate those.

Fred has successfully modded my bitterness. :D

Are you serious? The entire rant is about the product... The developers produce it, the bugs are bugs in it, the focus is the future of the product, and the 3rd party extensions are what make it competitive. I don't see how you can possibly disassociate those.

Are YOU serious?

"Developers produce it" - Still don't see what the personal actions of the makers have anything to do with it. If one of the Opera devs cheated on his wife, would you stop using it? It doesn't make sense.

"Focus is the future of the product" - Since when you personally care about the future of a product that you are in a no way involved in?

"3rd party extensions are what make it competitive" - Whatever, I'll make a crappy add-on for Photoshop and then start calling Photoshop crappy because add-ons "make it competitive"

Well... FF is not that bad...

- Since that I have 2GB RAM :p

- You can remove the "high memory use" feature

- If you don't like the per-user Extention, don't even look at Linux and Open Source software then

- Bug fixes? Beside security, is there some bugs fixed in IE?

Look at the competition, IE is sooo '90ies

IE7 is a copy of FF

Opera is nice, but I don't like the way it work.

I'm not a FF Fanboy, just can't find other stuff to compete it right now...

"Developers produce it" - Still don't see what the personal actions of the makers have anything to do with it. If one of the Opera devs cheated on his wife, would you stop using it? It doesn't make sense.

In a corporate environment there's tech support and developers. The tech support have people skills so the developers don't have to. In the open source world it's generally developers working directly with the users. In this case, if the developers can't communicate effectively with their users, and can't accept constructive criticism of their product, the quality of the product suffers. They can rob banks in their spare time for all I care, but their attitudes on the job are very relevant.

"Focus is the future of the product" - Since when you personally care about the future of a product that you are in a no way involved in?

Make no mistake, prior to version 1.0 I converted entirely to FireFox. I was a user and I promoted it with others. This is a product I want to like! I rant like this because I feel there's so much potential that's just not quite being met.

"3rd party extensions are what make it competitive" - Whatever, I'll make a crappy add-on for Photoshop and then start calling Photoshop crappy because add-ons "make it competitive"

FireFox is a core while Photoshop is one of the most detailed apps you can buy. How man people do you know that run with zero extensions? FireFox's feature set is thus that without at least a few extensions it just doesn't match up to many competitors. This makes them a factor in the overall product.

Yes but he isn't talking about those sorts of things. The actions of the developers and the way they act in an open source environment with users clearly affects the outcome of the product.

Yes! Thank you.

In a corporate environment there's tech support and developers. The tech support have people skills so the developers don't have to. In the open source world it's generally developers working directly with the users. In this case, if the developers can't communicate effectively with their users, and can't accept constructive criticism of their product, the quality of the product suffers. They can rob banks in their spare time for all I care, but their attitudes on the job are very relevant.

Just a small team of chief developers are on the job. Again back to OSS. Guess what? Not all of them get paid. Yet you expect professional courtesty. Also a corporate product you pay for. How much does FF cost?

Make no mistake, prior to version 1.0 I converted entirely to FireFox. I was a user and I promoted it with others. This is a product I want to like! I rant like this because I feel there's so much potential that's just not quite being met.

Take an active role in development instead of 'criticizing' then. Otherwise you're being non-productive.

FireFox is a core while Photoshop is one of the most detailed apps you can buy. How man people do you know that run with zero extensions? FireFox's feature set is thus that without at least a few extensions it just doesn't match up to many competitors. This makes them a factor in the overall product.

First you complain of implementation of features. Now you complain they don't match up without extensions? Nvm this one your not happy either way! :no:

Edited by Cierro

Just a small team of chief developers are on the job. Again back to OSS. Guess what. Not all of them get paid. Yet you expect professional courtesty. Also a corporate product you pay for. How much does FF cost?

First of all, the FireFox corporation is not a not-for-profit. They've made a lot of money recently.

And I stand by my statement that the developers' attitudes toward their users affects the product, regardless of whether they're being paid to be nice or whether it's just their nature. I've interacted with developers on lots of projects who don't know me from Adam, and by far and large, they've been very friendly and helpful to strangers such as myself. And they're not making any more than the FF guys are (often less).

Take an active role in development instead of 'criticizing' then. Otherwise you're being non-productive.

To a degree you're correct, however to reiterate my point: I've filed several bugs (not just feature requests). Based on my available time and skill areas, I'm not well cut out to develop FireFox, but I attempted many times to contribute with well organized feedback. This, should be considered "productive." But each time I was either shunned or ignored. This goes back to the user interfacing...

First you complain of implementation of features. Now you complain they don't match up without extensions? Nvm this one your not happy either way! :no:

I admit its a confusing stance to take, but to clarify: I would personally rather FireFox have lots of features (I'm always a sucker for extra features). It was the FireFox team's policy to keep all "features" in extensions (which I feel they are violating more and more often now). So in other words, I want the features, but can only have them via extensions which have poor quality control.

I didn't actually complain about implementing features, I complained that they would make great politicians because they say one thing and do another. They've WONTFIX'd countless third party requests because of their stated feature policy, yet they violate it themselves. It's this seeming hypocrisy that I oppose, not features themselves.

Well I would typically respond here, but I'm not.

I'm tired, and going to bed so I can worry about things that bother me more than whether FF is being politically correct or not or w.e the fudge it is now.

So I concede I guess you win here.

All i care about a few other things.

Hopefully w.e browser you choose fits you. goodnite :sleep:

Well I would typically respond here, but I'm not.

I'm tired, and going to bed so I can worry about things that bother me more than whether FF is being politically correct or not or w.e the fudge it is now.

So I concede I guess you win here.

All i care about a few other things.

Hopefully w.e browser you choose fits you. goodnite :sleep:

Thanks for keeping a civil conversation, gnite.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Neowin is saying these are good prices? Thats crazy. As others have said they are just ######. Time for big tech to bring down the prices for real not this fake crap.
    • The iFlyTek AINote 2 is among the thinnest E-Ink tablets. It has an EMR stylus, a built-in fingerprint reader, and plenty of built-in AI features. You had me until "and plenty of built-in AI features." That and any company that still does the iProduct naming trope is an immediate pass. It suggests the company isn't very imaginative or creative and is trying to piggyback off another company's success. Extremely lame. Also kind of expensive. Better choices at lower prices out there.
    • These are not "great" prices... just "less awful". Apparently "Those who forget the past are doomed to pay higher prices and think they've won."
    • Russia was able to invade Crimea because of those people. But my point is that I've personally heard how great it was to be "back in Russia" right afterwards - look how great it is now. I've asked you a question in another comment which you haven't answered, so I'll ask it again: is it better now without "Europrats"?
    • ZimaBoard 2 1664 Starter Kit review: it's a cool and affordable DIY NAS by Steven Parker IceWhale Technology reached out to me asking if I was interested in testing the ZimaBoard 2, and after convincing them to send me the Starter Kit, it arrived at my doorstep in May. A bit of background: it is a Shanghai-based Chinese company founded in 2020, which specializes in single-board servers and personal cloud solutions. From searching around online, user feedback on the company and ZimaOS is mostly positive, so we're off to a good start. In addition, I should probably point out that although they do not have a large portfolio of NAS devices, with just four of what they do offer, they seem to have covered everything from a relatively low-priced entry point with the ZimaBoard 2, right up to the high end, with the ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack that even includes an NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000. Anyway, as already mentioned, what we have today is the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit, and here are the full specifications: ZimaBoard 2 Model 832, 1664 CPU Intel Core N150 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.6 GHz) TDP: 6W (Base) 10W (Max) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.00 GHz) Memory 8 GB, 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (soldered) Disk Capacity 60 TB (30 TB x 2) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Storage 2 x SATA 3.0 6Gb/s Ports with Power Bootloader 32 GB, 64 GB eMMC Network 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE PCIe 1 x PCIe 3.0 (via LPC) USB Ports 2 x USB-A 3.1 (5 Gbps) Display Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Virtualization Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Size (H/W/D) 140mm x 83mm x 31mm Weight 0.4 kg (only ZimaBoard 2 device) Power 12v 5A Power Supply Warranty 1 year (Global) 2 Years (EU) OS ZimaOS v1.6.1 MSRP $339, $399 ($548.60) As you can see above, there are two variants of the ZimaBoard 2. The lesser variant has half the eMMC storage and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $60 less than the top variant we are testing today. The above pricing is only for the ZimaBoard 2. I put the MSRP of the Starter Kit next to it in brackets, although as of publishing, it is discounted to $534.50. The ZimaBoard 2 started life on Kickstarter and shipped to backers in August last year. It became available via the official website in late 2025 and Q1 2026. This hobbyist NAS contains the still relatively new N150 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, although in this case, the memory is integrated into the board itself, so it will not be possible to upgrade or expand the amount. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Twin Lake series that sits near the bottom of the N-series, designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops, and as such has a base level TDP of just 6W. As I have noted before, we are seeing another NAS with a great amount of RAM. It's important to mention that the ZimaBoard 2's memory is integrated into the base board (which is why they have two variants of it). As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The Starter Kit came in one outer box with several packages inside it (shown above). I forgot to take pics of it because when it arrived, it wasn't clear what was inside, and I had to confirm with my contact that I received the entire Starter Kit. In the box ZimaBoard 2 ZimaBoard 2 HDD Expansion Bracket + PCIe card frame Zimaboard Mini DisplayPort Male to HDMI Female Cable 4K 60Hz Zimaboard PCIe 3.0 x4 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Adapter Card Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws Design Where to start? You'd be forgiven for mistaking it as an SSD enclosure if not for all the ports on it. It is completely made out of metal, and the top is an entire heatsink. It has a premium feel about it, but it definitely looks like a hobby device. As you will see, the completed build looks like it belongs in a server or meter closet rather than as a showpiece on someone's desk. On what I am calling the rear, there's a Mini DisplayPort (1.4), two 2.5 GbE ports, with Type A 3.1 USB ports, and then the barrel connector port. Around the front, there are two SATA6 ports with a power connector in the middle. Left side Right side One side is completely free of ports. On the other there's a slit that allows for the feed of a CPU fan cable, and a PCIe 3.0 X4 slot. Top Bottom The top is entirely made up of a heatsink except for the extended height for the I/O on the rear. Around the other side, you can find the ZIMA branding and some regulatory information stamped near the bottom. As you may see from the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, it scratches quite easily from just moving it around on my Ikea island. Teardown Before we get started, let's have a look at this thing on the inside. The steps to get to the board are as follows: Remove the four smaller Torx screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2; Remove the four larger Torx screws on the sides of the device; Carefully unstick the CMOS battery from the PCB; Remove two Phillips screws on the PCB; Lift out the PCB. Yes, as you can tell from the instructions, you need three different tools to remove Torx and Phillips screws (10 in total), and unhelpfully, one of the screws is located under the CMOS battery, which is stuck onto the PCB. Building Now comes the fun part. Because the ZimaSpace website does not provide any guidance on how to put the Starter Kit together. They only have guidance for connecting the CPU fan. However, they did upload a video to their YouTube channel that shows the entire process. To install the fan, first remove the four screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, then on the inside, there is a CPU FAN connector where you can attach the fan, reattach the ZimaBoard 2 frame, and feed the fan cable through the provided slit. Then remove the nearest screw on the side and attach the fan frame to the side of the device using the same screw. ZimaBard 2 screws Aligning the screws Bottom view Remember those four screws we removed to access the CPU FAN? Longer screws are provided in the box with the HDD Expansion Bracket, which is what you will now need to attach the ZimaBoard 2 to it. Helpfully, the orientation on how to attach it is made obvious when the frame can only be screwed on at the same overall length as the ZimaBoard 2. If you do it the wrong way around (which is what I did initially) one side hangs off the frame, and it becomes difficult to attach the PCIe Adapter Card cable. PCIe card frame Other side PCIe slot connector Next, it's time to attach the PCIe card frame, which is fastened with the help of 3.5-inch SATA HDD (3 screws). These are toolless screws that you can just use your fingers to fasten them with. Then it is time to connect the provided PCIe cable with the slot connector on one side of the ZimaBoard 2, feed it through the bottom of the HDD frame, and fasten it with two standoffs. Both bracket options 2280 standoffs with 2x 4TB MP44Q The PCIe 3.0 X4 card comes with a short bracket option, handy if you decide to place it inside a different NAS or rack server, but here we need the long bracket. Oddly enough, the M.2 standoffs were preinstalled into the 22110 position, but extra standoffs are included in the box, which I installed at the 2280 position for our use. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $478.99 (the lowest price for 3 months) that TEAMGROUP supplied us with Then we have the almost completed build, you just need to push the card into the PCIe slot. Unfortunately, IceWhale Technologies did not provide a screw for the PCIe card frame (this is also apparent in their own video). Here it is at several different angles, with the last pic showing the SATA Y-Cable connected to the two WD Red Plus 4TB drives. Setup and Usage Next, you connect your cables to the I/O, and the ZimaBoard 2 powers on automatically, as there is no power button on the device. Power is controlled through the Settings in ZimaOS. BIOS The ZimaBoard 2 includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2, 3], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to a SATA/USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the ZimaBoard 2 can be reached by navigating to the IP address (shown if you have a monitor connected), or you can find it using the ZIMA Client desktop application, which is essentially a Zima device finder. Initializing the ZimaBoard 2 The ZimaOS setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full above, it basically consists of setting up an account and some handy tips, and that's that! Post Setup (ZimaOS update) Upon first boot, you are alerted that there is a ZimaOS update from 1.5.0 to 1.6.1, which I applied; the full process is shown above with the changelog. ZimaBoard 2 Storage Setup Next, it is time to set up the storage. ZimaOS actually throws everything onto the eMMC flash drive; it is also the default location of AppData, which is definitely something to be wary about, as the 45GB available storage could fill up quickly. HDDs I first attempted to create a Storage Pool using the two 4TB WD Red Plus NAS drives, and got an error message: After several attempts and then looking online, I discovered it was a bug with ZimaOS where the fix was simply to reboot ZimaOS and then try again, this time I was able to create a RAID mirror using the two drives. SSDs I did the same for the SSDs, as you will see in the above gallery, when I created the second Storage Pool, it only allowed me to select available drives. ZimaBoard 2 AppData ZimaOS comes with an App Store that includes a repository of almost 400 apps, so you will be able to find most of what you'll need for a NAS (although after a quick search, I wasn't able to find a Surveillance Manager), and now comes the important part: moving the default AppData location off the 45GB eMMC and onto a larger volume: Open Settings Then Apps Then, in the Select a new location field, click on the new Storage volume you want to move it to (in my case, the Apps Storage Pool), which is the SSD RAID mirror. Confirm the Migration warning Be praised! You can also do this for Docker (which by default installs onto the 45GB eMMC flash drive) and the User database. Plex Setup Next, I tested the configuration by installing the Plex Server app from the App Store. The library folders must already exist (which I placed into the Storage Pool). Plex Server setup is straightforward and requires very little configuration. In my case, all I had to do was add the media path I just created, which you can also browse to using the folder icon in the path field. In addition, you can now map the new Media library in Windows Explorer using the Zima Client. Oddly enough, it is not possible to access the ZimaBoard 2 over the Network Neighborhood; you must map drives using the client, which is shown in the last image in the above gallery. I watched one of my Blu-Ray rips, which is Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos, and the content played fine with no stuttering or buffering, which is what anyone needs in this scenario. ZimaBoard 2 Zima Client mobile app There's also a client for mobile. It is pretty barebones, as shown in the above gallery, for example, the Apps screen launches the WebUI for that app, and the Backup must be done manually. On opening Backup, you can select internal storage folders on your phone to backup to the ZimaBoard 2's storage, and although this is constantly scanned, the backup action itself must be manually triggered. There is an option to allow foreground backup (last image in the above gallery), but this basically means the queued backup gets triggered when you manually open the app. Benchmarking SATA PCIe 3.0 X4 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 2.5 GbE was well within acceptable ranges. Writes were generally better on the SSD RAID mirror. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 2.5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 2.5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. Thermals Top PCIe card SATA HDDs Next, I measured some hotspots while playing content on Plex. It's fair to say this will perform better than a NAS that is enclosed in a metal or plastic case, as almost everything storage-wise is exposed! Anyway, the ZimaBoard 2 did not break a sweat with Plex streaming or disk benchmarks. ZimaOS Factory Reset ZimaOS does not include a factory reset option. Instead, you have to download the ZimaOS image and flash it to the eMMC manually. The flashing process is shown in the above gallery. The steps to do so are listed below: Download the ZimaOS image here; Open BalenaEtcher (Run as Administrator) and select the image; Select your inserted USB drive (min 8 GB) Flash to it; Connect your USB drive, monitor, keyboard, USB hub (optional), mouse (optional), and network cable (recommended) to the ZimaBoard 2; Connect power and press F11 continuously; Select your USB drive starting with UEFI in the boot device menu; Press Enter on the Install ZimaOS option; Select /dev/mmcblk0 (MMC) flash drive as target; Confirm with (three times) to wipe the target disk; Wait a couple of minutes while ZimaOS installs; Remove the USB drive and confirm with a reboot; Your ZimaBoard 2 has been factory reset. However, you don't have to stick with ZimaOS, in fact the company also offers official CasaOS images, that are based on Debian; or as they say themselves, put anything you want on this "hackable single board server" it's up to you. Conclusion I had a lot of fun putting this together. I've custom-built all my own PCs and servers since the 90s, and this is the first time I have had to put a NAS together. Even if the actual base ZimaBoard 2 was already a completed build, it still feels pretty custom. I just wish that IceWhale Technology included a getting-started guide in the box for the Start Kit, which would have really completed this kit. Instead, I had to search for the official video on the YouTube channel to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong. So who is this for? Definitely the hobbyist who is comfortable building their own PC and servers. It also has a much smaller footprint than its nearest equivalent (in terms of specs), like the Beelink Me Pro, which is another NAS I will be testing soon. Although the Beelink does not come with the PCIe 3.0 X4 expansion, the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit suddenly looks to be a great bargain, even if it only offers the two 3.5-inch bays over the four in the other example. It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N150 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the ZimaBoard 2 is intended for, media streaming and backup. It also looks like the IceWhale Technology staff are quite active in the official forums helping people with issues they come across with ZimaOS and the devices, peer support seems to be good as well, I was quickly able to find why I was not able to create a new Storage Pool in ZimaOS v1.6.1 even though that is quite a serious bug, hopefully it will be fixed in the next update. If you are comfortable with the command line and Docker, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. This was my first time with ZimaOS. It seems a bit barebones in comparison to the likes of Synology DSM, TOS, and UGOS, but it has a ton of apps to get you started with your home or small business NAS. Where to buy As of publishing, IceWhale Technology is running a discount of up to 5% for the Starter Kit. If you opt to get just the ZimaBoard 2 itself, it does come with a SATA Y-Cable, so you will be able to connect up to two 3.5-inch HDDs to it. ZimaBoard 2 1668 Starter Kit for $534.50 on Amazon US (was $548.60) ZimaBoard 2 832 Starter Kit for $372.88 on Amazon US (was $390.60) Zimaboard 2 1668 (16GB+64GB) for $419.90 on Amazon US Zimaboard 2 832 (8GB+32GB) for $359.90 on Amazon Disclosure: IceWhale Technology provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. Good to know The Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!