Paul McCartney Divorce costs $48.7 Million

[Hum]

LONDON ? Paul McCartney was ordered Monday to pay Heather Mills $48.7 million to settle their bitter and drawn-out divorce battle.

A document released by the Family Court said the judge awarded Mills a lump sum of $33 million plus assets she currently holds worth $15.6 million. Mills said she was "very happy" with the settlement.

"I'm so, so happy with this," Mills told reporters following the closed hearing.

The court also ruled that the couple's 4-year-old daughter Beatrice should receive a "periodical payments order" of $70,000 per annum. On top of that, McCartney will pay for the child's nanny and school fees.

While pleased with the financial settlement, Mills intends to appeal to prevent publication of the details of the settlement for the couple's daughter.

Mills had sought almost $250 million, while McCartney had said she should receive $31.6 million, including her own assets, which the court assessed at $15.6 million.

Judge Hugh Bennett found that the total value of all of McCartney's assets, including his business assets, was about $800 million. He said there was no evidence to support the widely published figure that it was as much as $1.6 billion.

McCartney left the court without making any statement.

"I'm so glad it's over," Mills said at her impromptu news conference.

"It was an incredible result in the end to secure mine and my daughter's future and that of all the charities that I obviously plan on helping and making a difference with ? because you know it has been my life for 20 years," she said.

"Obviously the court do not want a litigant in person to do well, it's against everything that they ever wish, so when they write the judgment up they're never going to make it look in favor," she continued.

"But all of you that have researched know that it was always going to be a figure between 20 and 30 million [pounds], Paul was offering a lot less than that, which you'll see in the judgment, and very much last minute to put me and Beatrice sadly through this ... incredibly sad."

Mills said the settlement vindicated her decision to fire her lawyers. The legal fees, she said, instead "could easily go to charity."

She had harsh words for McCartney's lawyer, Fiona Shackleton, who was well known for representing Prince Charles in his divorce from Princess Diana.

"She has called me many, many names before even meeting me when I was in a wheelchair," said Mills.

Bennett delivered his ruling Monday at a closed-door hearing at London's Royal Courts of Justice.

McCartney, wearing a dark suit and a black-and-white scarf, was the first to arrive, followed five minutes later by Mills, who wore a blue-and-brown pantsuit.

McCartney, 65, and Mills, 40, went to court last month to decide on Mills' share of his fortune.

The settlement has been a long time coming for the couple, who separated two years ago after four years of marriage. At the time they said the parting was "amicable" and insisted "both of us still care about each other very much."

But the split has grown fractious since McCartney filed for divorce alleging his wife's "unreasonable behavior."

Mills ? a former model whose left leg was amputated below the knee after a motorcycle accident in 1993 ? claimed McCartney had failed to protect her and their daughter from slander, death threats and other abuse, and accused the media of persecuting her. In November, Mills said she had been "treated worse than a murderer or a pedophile," despite years of work for land-mine victims and animal welfare charities.

When the couple and their lawyers appeared for a six-day hearing before the judge last month, photographers craned to catch a glimpse of them entering the grand, neo-Gothic court building, and reporters huddled outside the courtroom door.

But few details emerged.

Legal experts said the fact that the couple have a child would be taken into account in a settlement ? but so would the relative brevity of the marriage and the fact that most of McCartney's wealth was generated before he married Mills.

McCartney met Mills in 1999, the year after the death from breast cancer of his first wife, Linda. That marriage was one of rock's most enduring unions, and produced three children, including fashion designer Stella McCartney.

Mills and McCartney married at an Irish castle in June 2002, amid rumors the former Beatle's children disapproved of their new stepmother. The couple's daughter was born the following year.

source

[pollaxe]

Hell, *I'd* marry Paul McCartney for 24 million!

[The_Fox]

she is a boot, she's nuts she was on english TV not long ago having a paddy about it. just goes to show that women get a unfair advantage in the courts.

[Berserk87]

Hell, *I'd* marry Paul McCartney for 24 million!

lol.

[EduardValencia]

Oh wow,divorce these days can be really nasty,that girl certainly ripped him off a bit!

[sundayx Veteran]

"I'm so, so happy with this," Mills told reporters following the closed hearing.

:rolleyes:

[Lee G. Veteran]

It was inevitable this would happen, from day one of their relationship.

[That Guy Veteran]

What a scummy women.

McCartney left the court without making any statement.

Actually he did, at least BBC say he did. He apparently said "all will be revealed".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7300931.stm

I do hope it is, I look forward to her downfall. While I can't really say Paul is 'poor' (excuse the pun), I can't imagine being humiliated by her would be exactly pleasant (and yes, losing that kinda money to a cow like her is pretty humiliating).

[Hum]

pfft ... McCartney shouldn't need to pay anything for child support, when mommy has 33 million-plus. :rolleyes:

[Berserk87]

pfft ... McCartney shouldn't need to pay anything for child support, when mommy has 33 million-plus. :rolleyes:

well, paying for the kid is his responsibility too, but 70k a year for childsupport?!?

[Brandon]

well, paying for the kid is his responsibility too, but 70k a year for childsupport?!?

How else is she going to get a Bentley for her 16th birthday

[Crazysah]

Man... This is a big settlement but paying for child support is a must..

[Hum]

I'm quite sure Sir McCartney would have lavished his daughter with all kinds of support, without the courts sticking their nose in.

And many families survive on a lot less than $70,000, let alone ONE child !

$800 million goes a long way. :laugh:

[Angelic Marge]

No wonder she didn't want all the details released :rolleyes:

[Rappy Veteran]

Shes gonna be having one of those lavish sweet sixteen parties when shes old enough to get the money!

[DrunkenMaster]

No wonder she didn't want all the details released :rolleyes:

Yep, 1/2 a million pounds ~ $750,000 US dollars for a vacation. Easy to spend money when its not your own and haven't earned it.

Bugging conversations between child and father? That sounds like from day one it was all about blackmail and extortion. The first 10 seconds of anyone strikes a permanent impression. I knew even after watching her on the tele she was a gold digger.

Anywho, she is leaving the UK, I should think. No one will like her there. I hope she moves somewhere where people won't forget who she is.

[Diffused Mind]

Of course Mills is a liar, she hasn't got a leg to stand on.