GTA IV: Not very impressed.


Recommended Posts

OK, maybe its me but I picked up a copy of GTA IV and well I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. So much so that I find it unplayable.

What's with all the anti-aliasing all over the place - everything looks blurry and it really hurts my eyes after a bit. The graphics aren't that hot either with jaggies and glitches. Shadows look like they've shaded with a pencil and walls inside buildings look flat with no interactivity.

Everything is so dark at times it's really hard to see what you're doing and you get the feeling your just fumbling to accomplish something. The camera viewpoint is also annoying.

If you don't get to complete a particular mission, you have to start the whole section from the beginning. Its so frustrating at times. I literally cannot play this for longer than about 15 minutes before my eyes hurt and I get ****ed off.

Is it really just me or does anyone else feel the same? :blink:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/636089-gta-iv-not-very-impressed/
Share on other sites

I well and truly believe it is just you not that you are wrong but I see the problems you are mentioning and they are no where near making it unplayable let alone even come to the point where they diminish it as a truly great gaming experience it is.

My suggestion, sit further from the tv, that may be the problem secondly you failing a mission is not the games fault although a mission checkpoint system wouldn't have hurt...

It is a truly great game shame to hear you are having problems :(

I agree to an extent, it's still not as good as GTA3 or Vice City; and the critics have been getting away from themselves. Because NO game should get 10/10: it would need to be perfect in every respect; which GTA4 certainly isn't.

I will say that after playing it for a few hours it gets better and is more fun.

Is it really just me or does anyone else feel the same? :blink:

I'll agree with you. I don't have a console to play it on but I've played the previous games a bit so was quite excited to see that improvements in IV and I saw it for the first time yesterday, on PS3, and the first thing I thought was that I was disappointed with the graphics, particularly the anti-aliasing, it looks terrible!

Now, I haven't played it at all and I was only watching for about 5 minutes so I don't know about it hurting my eyes but I have to agree that it looks a LOT less impressive than I was expecting!

I am on 1080p. Problem is, the PS3 version doesn't support 1080 even though it says so on the box. It's upscaled to 720p. I doubt that has anything to do with the anti-aliasing in the game though.

Yes the game is dark in buildings/under bridges/at night but that is why they invented colour controls both on TVs and in games. As for the camera I find it excellent, it is almost always behind the car/niko like it should be unlike Metal Gear Online that just seemed to stay at one angle no matter which direction I faced. If you're not happy with the camera, move the right analog stick and the camera will move, or, press R3 and the camera will reset (basically R3 will make you look behind while held so a quick press causes the camera to look behind then straight forward). Finally, failing a mission of course means you'll start from the beginning of the mission, after all in racing games you have to start a race again if your car is totalled :p

Yes the game is dark in buildings/under bridges/at night but that is why they invented colour controls both on TVs and in games. As for the camera I find it excellent, it is almost always behind the car/niko like it should be unlike Metal Gear Online that just seemed to stay at one angle no matter which direction I faced. If you're not happy with the camera, move the right analog stick and the camera will move, or, press R3 and the camera will reset (basically R3 will make you look behind while held so a quick press causes the camera to look behind then straight forward). Finally, failing a mission of course means you'll start from the beginning of the mission, after all in racing games you have to start a race again if your car is totalled :p

I shouldn't have to alter the TV brightness/contrast for one game, that means it will be out for everything else. I don't have to do it for every TV channel or DVD/BD movie or anything other game.

I think the graphics isn't superuber clear as we have expected to be, but still it's pretty impressive. If it does hurt your eyes, perhaps you guys sitting too close to the TV? I have the ps3 version coupled with Sony LCD TV and it looks pretty fine. Well asides from the occasional freezing bug, which is really annoying, the game is quite fun to play. I hope em fixes the bugs soon.

I like it so far. Only thing I dislike atm are the controls for walking. It's my 1st GTA game on a console and I'd personally prefer it if the left and right was for straffing rather than turning like in FPS titles and the 2nd analogue controlled turning while on foot.

Besides that I like it, and I'm sure ill become accustomed to it.

Actually one other thing, I dont like having to hold "A" to run and tapping it to sprint. Thats what analogue sticks are there for, to provide different levels of sensitivity.

Not game breakers but.

edit: Mines a 360 version, but the complains in this topic could apply to either anyway I gather.

I turned both brightness and saturation(?) to the max ^^

I agree, there should be some checkpoints every now and then..

I agree to an extent, it's still not as good as GTA3 or Vice City; and the critics have been getting away from themselves. Because NO game should get 10/10: it would need to be perfect in every respect; which GTA4 certainly isn't.

I will say that after playing it for a few hours it gets better and is more fun.

But no game will ever be perfect

GTA4 deserves a 10 just because of the huge amount of playing time and the replay value - add on top of that all the other stuff

On a 55" HDTV the graphics are ridicilously blurry - they actually hurt my eyes. I've asked a few friends to look at them for a while and they complain exactly the same thing - this has absolutely nothing to do with the settings on the TV as the same issue crops up on 42" Philips, L?ewe and other televisions at work.

Of course the fanboys will go Q_Q THE GFX ARE FINE THE GAME IS PERFECT WAWAWAA. It's about as far from perfect as Uwe Bolls movies.

I wasn't that impressed with the graphics either, jagged edges and plants popping up as you walk over them. I understand why though, because of the free playing nature of the game, the gameplay is great fun but I'll be waiting for the PC version anyway. I can't stand playing GTA with a pad.

On a 55" HDTV the graphics are ridicilously blurry - they actually hurt my eyes. I've asked a few friends to look at them for a while and they complain exactly the same thing - this has absolutely nothing to do with the settings on the TV as the same issue crops up on 42" Philips, L?ewe and other televisions at work.

Funny, on my 42" Pioneer Plasma the picture is extremely crisp and looks beautiful - The game does have a stream engine which allows you to see individual pixels in certain scenes, mostly on shadows,

but that doesn't take anything away from the game.

Funny, on my 42" Pioneer Plasma the picture is extremely crisp and looks beautiful - The game does have a stream engine which allows you to see individual pixels in certain scenes, mostly on shadows,

but that doesn't take anything away from the game.

Which platform are you playing it on? The PS3 version is a little more blurry but it all comes down to preference. I actually prefer the PS3 look (and pad) so I play it more on the PS3.

The 360 is a lot sharper, but in my opinion too sharp and has far more jaggies.

Which platform are you playing it on? The PS3 version is a little more blurry but it all comes down to preference. I actually prefer the PS3 look (and pad) so I play it more on the PS3.

The 360 is a lot sharper, but in my opinion too sharp and has far more jaggies.

I'm on the 360 version

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!