GTA IV: Not very impressed.


Recommended Posts

It's most likely not your TV.

If you're using the PS3 version, go into the Display Settings in the PS3 XMB and go through the setup.

Choose HDMI, UNCHECK all resolutions besides 1080p, (You can't uncheck the 480) and then run the game, it will render it in 1080p. For some reason it wants to render the game in 630p or upscale it to 720p.

Let everyone know if this helps on all of your tv's, Most 1080p HDTV's will look better with the game forced to 1080p

If they turned HDR + Bloom off and got rid of the same thing for car headlights, I mean car headlights in the Day? That must be doing so many ridiculous calculations every frame to find what the HDR is bouncing off.

Framerate is unbelievbly crap for something that doesnt even get rendered at 720p. Good game non the less, but they really shouldn't shipped the product as it is.

my version is 720 p :p anyway. to my point.

Game HDR is NOT the same as HDR used in CG renders. there's is no light bouncing or caluclations of the sort. HDR in games simply refer to high dynamic range of the render output. meanign that colors aren't just colors but may have emperature as well. so you can have a plan white, but when you look at the sky, the white may have a higher "temperature" or rather it's whiteness is beyond white, wich is what's used to create better glows, and such. like the sun will create a lot more glow than a puny street light.

And this HDR caculation and glow actually has barely any impact on performance. I've also never had the problems of not being able to turn because of low FPS, I have problems tunring because the cars have ridiculous handling. even the high end sports cars needs to break to waalk speed to turn. that's just stupid.

When reviews give the game a 10 for graphics, they take into the account the scale of the game. The graphics are the best out there in this category of game. You can't say it has way more jaggies compared to... say CoD4. It's all relative. Also a 10 doesn't mean it's perfect.

OK, so I had a quick 30 min play on my mates PS3 - wasn't really impressed.

Then my bro came up and we played on his 360 on my hi-def TV, got to say it looked a lot better, but still quite dark at night.

I found the city to be drab, dull, etc. I have been introduced to GTA by Vice City and so by comparison GTA4 will be dull - it's a lot less colourful, the music not to my tastes, etc. Really didn't consider it a game worth spending my money on.

Then we took it online...

I will be buying GTA4 asap! It just rocks on Live!

I'd have to say that the graphics are actually much better than I expected. GTA games have never been known for having groundbreaking graphics, and it's felt in the past that the looks of the games were sacrificed in order to focus more on content and sheer scope. When I played GTA4 the first time, I was surprised by how slick and modern it looked compared to my expectations.

I'm really enjoying the game, more and more as I get further into the story.

After spending a good amount of time playing GTA4, I've come up with a few thoughts on the game.

I can say that it is definitely a great game. The game is just so big and detailed its just amazing. However, I do get the occasional FPS problems especially when I've got like 6-7 cop cars chasing me around. I don't have any big issues with graphics... any smoothing in 720p is virtually invisible in 1080i and its pretty "sharp" looking.

Some of the radios are absolute crap other than that multiplayer online is out of this world. ;) It's worth its value more than GT5:P, which infact I haven't played in two weeks...

OK, so I had a quick 30 min play on my mates PS3 - wasn't really impressed.

Then my bro came up and we played on his 360 on my hi-def TV, got to say it looked a lot better, but still quite dark at night.

I found the city to be drab, dull, etc. I have been introduced to GTA by Vice City and so by comparison GTA4 will be dull - it's a lot less colourful, the music not to my tastes, etc. Really didn't consider it a game worth spending my money on.

Then we took it online...

I will be buying GTA4 asap! It just rocks on Live!

I thought PS3 looked better although 360 was more sharper but more popins as well

I thought PS3 looked better although 360 was more sharper but more popins as well

I'm not going to enter into a 360 > PS3 (or either way) debate. I played the PS3 version on a SD screen, the 360 on an HD screen - so I cannot make a fair comparison.

I'm not going to enter into a 360 > PS3 (or either way) debate. I played the PS3 version on a SD screen, the 360 on an HD screen - so I cannot make a fair comparison.

:laugh: , no you cant. They look very similar and its really down to personal preference (if you own both consoles) on which you buy it.

This thread is pretty pointless. The people not impressed with this game are ones that either have their standards too high or were unrealistically expecting perfection. While GTA IV is not perfect by and means, it is pretty damn good just the way it is!

This thread is pretty pointless. The people not impressed with this game are ones that either have their standards too high or were unrealistically expecting perfection. While GTA IV is not perfect by and means, it is pretty damn good just the way it is!

How is it pointless? The fact that many online reviews have given this game 10/10 to me illustrates perfection, which of course as you pointed out, it is not. Many people will buy this game based on reviews.

The game is amazing. I agree though its not 10/10. It is however a game I cannot put down which is a big plus point. With games only time can really tell if it earns a 10/10 score. I know with GTA IV the reviewers were restricted and were made to go to certain places to review the game rather than being given copies of the game. There's two games that are on my 10/10 list, Half-Life (Mainly due to its mods though) and Goldeneye on the N64. These are both old games yet they are still very addictive.

How is it pointless? The fact that many online reviews have given this game 10/10 to me illustrates perfection, which of course as you pointed out, it is not. Many people will buy this game based on reviews.

You know if they were to rate something a 9.9 then a better one comes out, the next logical step up is a 10. 10/10 means it meets all gaming expectations, not a perfection of realism.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • lots of people us facebook for stuff, threads though no
    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      102
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!