+Warwagon MVC Posted March 9, 2009 MVC Share Posted March 9, 2009 Nod32 Win32/Kryptik.JX false positive This morning a recent definition update to the popular Nod32 Antivirus introduced a false positive causing the Antivirus to prompt users to remove core system files, or in some cases delete the files automatically. The system files in question are msdtc.exe, winlogon.exe and dllhost.exe. Most are located in the System32 folder while other are in the c:\windows folder. They were being detected as Win32/Kryptik.JX. You may want to check your logs to make sure you are not affected. If those system files have been automatically deleted on your system you can follow the instructions in the link below to resolve the problem. 10 mins after the problem was discovered nod32 released an update to the Antivirus definitions which corrected the issue. If you reboot the system with those files deleted windows may no longer boot until the files in question are restored. http://kb.eset.com/esetkb/index?page=conte...ctp=LIST_RECENT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sethos Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 This is the second time NOD32 is having issues with a botched update triggering false positives, coupled with the fact it's barely in the top 5 any more according to AV-test, I doubt I'll be renewing my sub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgEnTsMiTh Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Did not have a problem here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhav Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 stopped using NOD32 in favour of comodo's entirely free package that seems just as light on resources :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argi Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Oops, lucky I changed to Kaspersky after my Nod license expired. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scirwode Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 Oops, lucky I changed to Kaspersky after my Nod license expired. :p Lucky I changed to NIS2009 after my ESS license expired :p . Scirwode Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Mystic MVC Posted March 10, 2009 MVC Share Posted March 10, 2009 Didn't have any issue and NOD32 has been great for me since I got it last October. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reacon Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 And thus we see the downfall of NOD32... And the rising of Kapersky and Norton :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tsupersonic Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 stopped using NOD32 in favour of comodo's entirely free package that seems just as light on resources :)Nod32 is known not just for its light system usage, but its fantastic job in detection rates. I doubt comodo can match nod32 in terms of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fix-this! Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 im using nod32 version 4 with no issues on vista. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goretsky Supervisor Posted March 10, 2009 Supervisor Share Posted March 10, 2009 Hello, There is a message on ESET's web site here with additional information about what happened and how they responded. Interesting reading. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srugie Veteran Posted March 10, 2009 Veteran Share Posted March 10, 2009 I love NOD32 and I've never had any problems with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Warwagon MVC Posted March 10, 2009 Author MVC Share Posted March 10, 2009 My questing is why don't these antivirus companies have a machine with a clean install of windows that has the latest updates. Then do a full system scan with the current virus database before you push the update. That would eliminate these bad updates which delete core system files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smigit Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 They probably do test them. Whether they can test over a wide enough range of hardware and whether issues like this are necessarily visible immediately are another thing but. Sure those files are pretty obvious, but in the future it could be one that's more obscure that's only needed during a weekly scheduled event or whatever that gets wiped. Not that it's right of course...but I highly doubt they throw these out without some testing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denholm Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 Checked our Media Center PC and Laptop - both unaffected. Thanks for the update anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fubar Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 just checked all my machines and nothing happened here , not according to the logs on all of them anyway , thanks for the heads up though just noticed this bit on that link that was posted The update downloads were stopped within ten minutes of the update release, and the update was reverted to its previous version. Due to this immediate response, less than 5% of our users were affected. caught pretty much straight away , would explain a lot lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesVault Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 (edited) This is another evidence of how an antivirus is often useless and more dangerous than a virus :crazy: The facts: - the antivirus programs always introduce a lot of incompatibilities and problems in Windows and slow down your machine - the antivirus programs cover only a very small % of malware in the wild - the users have an antivirus installed (kaspersky, avg, nod32, norton, avira, etc), it doesn't matter what they have, but they still continue to get infected by a virus - the antivirus vendors still continue to release new virus definitions without even testing them on a Windows machine ===> the antivirus marked has completely failed! Edited March 10, 2009 by jamesVault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+shift. MVC Posted March 10, 2009 MVC Share Posted March 10, 2009 This is another evidence of how an antivirus is often useless and more dangerous than a virus :crazy: And what are you implying with that? That we shouldn't use anti-virus 'cause it does more bad than good? :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smigit Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 - the users have an antivirus installed (kaspersky, avg, nod32, norton, avira, etc), it doesn't matter what they have, but they still continue to get infected by a virus Sure, just as people wearing seat belts still die in cars and people wearing condoms still parent kids. Antivirus is not and never should be seen as a means of complete protection. Thats not to say they can't help. - the antivirus vendors still continue to release new virus definitions without even testing them on a Windows machine How many definitions do anti virus companies release? Thousands? One causes an issue and within 10 minutes of being discovered it has been corrected. I'm sorry but the ratio of definitions that don't screw the machine over to the ones that do is absolutely immense and would probably imply that they do go through some testing. Again, it certainly is disconcerting this got through but to make blanket statements like Antivirus is useless and that they don't do any testing is pretty ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViperAFK Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 This is the second time nod32 has done this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Mystic MVC Posted March 10, 2009 MVC Share Posted March 10, 2009 At least 10 computers out of (probably at least a hundred) at part time ITS job were affected, but it wasn't anything too serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(Spork) Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 And thus we see the downfall of NOD32... And the rising of Kapersky and Norton :D Bloatware ! ill stick to my Avira .... i was a big time NOD32 fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goretsky Supervisor Posted March 12, 2009 Supervisor Share Posted March 12, 2009 Hello, My understanding is that all anti-virus companies do this, but from the description of the problem, it sounds like they were doing unit testing of virus signature databases and module updates, and both passed separately. It was some sort of interaction between the two that caused a problem. It looks like they learned from it, though: http://www.eset.com/joomla/index.php?optio...39&Itemid=2 Regards, Aryeh Goretsky My questing is why don't these antivirus companies have a machine with a clean install of windows that has the latest updates. Then do a full system scan with the current virus database before you push the update. That would eliminate these bad updates which delete core system files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.958469f789995895cc0de1fb3c106d00.jpg)
Recommended Posts