http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...d6-fec84216dd9c
| Windows XP SP3, Windows Vista SP1 and Windows 7 Features comparison | |
|---|---|
| Post #1 May 19 2009, 14:53 | |
|
Resident Fanatic  Group: Banned Posts: 529 Joined: 5-February 08 Member No.: 247,105 
|
This chart compares features of interest to IT professionals across three versions of the Windows client operating system: Windows XP SP3, Windows Vista SP1, and Windows 7:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...d6-fec84216dd9c |
   |
 
|
|
Log In or Register · Advertise on Neowin |
|
| Post #2 May 19 2009, 15:01 | |
|
Resident Fanatic Group: Registered Posts: 515 Joined: 14-November 01 From: Portugal Member No.: 3,576
|
Might as well change the topic name to,
Windows7 New Features and Changes in Architecture, this isnt a comparison its a new feature/changelog maybe list. I enjoyed knowing that we will have a better OS indeed. Thanks |
|
|
|
| Post #3 May 19 2009, 15:13 | |
Neowinian Senior  Group: Registered Posts: 2,998 Joined: 3-July 04 Member No.: 61,271
|
hahah... i dont even understand half of what the features names meant... look at that, a whole column of nothing but 'new' and 'improved'
|
 |
|
| Post #4 May 19 2009, 15:18 | |
Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE  Group: Registered Posts: 7,971 Joined: 5-November 02 From: Sydney, Australia Member No.: 18,699
|
Just give us the option of a cascading menu as in XP.
FFS it aint hard is it? Less clicks and bloody easier. Vista and Windows 7, more clicks, more searching for the app you want. ****ing ridiculous |
|
|
|
| Post #5 May 19 2009, 15:20 | |
Neowinian ULTRAKILL  Group: Registered Posts: 13,452 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Ottawa, On Member No.: 1,419
|
so this shows that Windows XP isn't missing much? Libraries....who cares? Desktop search? meh
|
|
|
|
| Post #6 May 19 2009, 15:25 | |
|
Neowinian  Group: Registered Posts: 6 Joined: 18-May 09 Member No.: 293,566
|
Windows 7 FTW
 !
|
|
|
|
| Post #7 May 19 2009, 15:27 | |
|
Back and Refreshed!   Group: +Subscriber Posts: 9,227 Joined: 30-September 03 Member No.: 36,448
|
But... does it boot faster is the question
 
|
|
|
|
| Post #8 May 19 2009, 15:31 | |
|
Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE Group: Registered Posts: 7,971 Joined: 5-November 02 From: Sydney, Australia Member No.: 18,699
|
Boots as fast as a normal clean booted computer boots.
I found no diff with clean XP, Clean Vista or clean Windows 7 Its what you put into it that ultimately adds to the boot time. |
|
|
|
| Post #9 May 19 2009, 15:38 | |
|
Neowinian ULTRAKILL Group: Registered Posts: 13,452 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Ottawa, On Member No.: 1,419
|
Quote - (Jasur @ May 19 2009, 11:31)  Boots as fast as a normal clean booted computer boots. I found no diff with clean XP, Clean Vista or clean Windows 7 Its what you put into it that ultimately adds to the boot time. +1 I think the biggest boot time killer is antivirus |
|
|
|
| Post #10 May 19 2009, 16:31 | |
|
Back and Refreshed! Group: +Subscriber Posts: 9,227 Joined: 30-September 03 Member No.: 36,448
|
Quote - (Rudy @ May 19 2009, 16:38) +1 I think the biggest boot time killer is antivirus Hehehe... Just install Linux, then you wont need antivirus Hahahaha
|
|
|
|
| Post #11 May 20 2009, 22:05 | |
|
Resident Fanatic Group: Registered Posts: 659 Joined: 11-November 03 Member No.: 40,227
|
For my usage, that confirms there's nothing additional in Vista or Win 7 that I need or would use, so will stick with XP, at least until 2014 or if I'm forced to buy a new PC.
|
|
|
|
| Post #12 May 20 2009, 22:07 | |
Neowinian Wise One  Group: Registered Posts: 4,315 Joined: 21-June 08 From: Bahrain Member No.: 254,628
|
Quote - (JRosenfeld @ May 21 2009, 01:05) For my usage, that confirms there's nothing additional in Vista or Win 7 that I need or would use, so will stick with XP, at least until 2014 or if I'm forced to buy a new PC. you might as well wait for windows.Next |
|
|
|
| Post #13 May 20 2009, 22:15 | |
NeowinianČ  Group: Registered Posts: 131 Joined: 2-February 07 Member No.: 201,195
|
Quote - (JRosenfeld @ May 20 2009, 23:05) For my usage, that confirms there's nothing additional in Vista or Win 7 that I need or would use, so will stick with XP, at least until 2014 or if I'm forced to buy a new PC. Quote - (skynetXrules @ May 20 2009, 23:07) you might as well wait for windows.Next I think he was joking.  Wait...he was joking right? 
|
|
|
|
| Post #14 May 21 2009, 03:17 | |
Braaiiiiiinnsss! Use them. Group: +Subscriber Posts: 2,576 Joined: 3-April 06 From: Bristol, UK Member No.: 162,229
|
This is a list for IT professionals. Not general home users.
You may not understand some of them. That doesn't suddenly mean they don't exist, or don't impact usability. And as for the Vista/Win7 start menu needing more clicks? How, exactly? |
|
|
|
| Post #15 May 21 2009, 03:20 | |
Bitter and Conceited Group: Registered Posts: 6,645 Joined: 21-August 02 From: $ometime in 2008 Occupation: Never Member No.: 17,075
|
Quote - (Kirkburn @ May 21 2009, 03:17) And as for the Vista/Win7 start menu needing more clicks? How, exactly? Only if he uses the osk... |
|
|
|
| « Older · Back Page News · Newer » | |
2 Pages 
[1] 2 ... Next
|
|
