Site issue while running MSIE6


Recommended Posts

Can anyone tell me why it is that everytime I go to the Neowin site, that I have to wait for the computer to process 150+ "items" before I can do anything on the site, like scrolling through the posts or clicking on a thread to view? In some instances, I have to wait for these "items" to process before I can open a thread and then I have to wait again for the "items" to be processed before I can scroll through the posts for the thread. In other instances, these "items" that are trying to be processed end up locking up the web browser. I am currently experiencing this problem when I try to view the desktop thread.

I'm accessing Neowin on a work computer which still has IE 6 on it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/840534-site-issue-while-running-msie6/
Share on other sites

I'm unofficially prepared to blame MSIE6 but we'll see what the NeoDevs say.

[Thread Moved from GD to S&FI]

Any new information as to the source of the problem?

There is definately something about page 1 of the desktop thread that is consistently causing IE to stop responding.

I'm at work right now and so took a look at your problem on IE6 here. While performance is degraded on this browser, the site is still functional and I don't see any of the specific slowdowns you've mentioned. It could be that your company is throttling connection attempts through its proxy, such that the site is stalling as it waits to load certain JS/CSS/images. This could explain why the desktop pictures thread, given its image-heavy nature, produces the effects you're seeing.

In short, yes IE6 performance is degraded but not by the amount you're experiencing, at least here: I suspect it's an internal IT issue, but I will look into this some more just in case there's an easy optimisation we've missed.

I'm at work right now and so took a look at your problem on IE6 here. While performance is degraded on this browser, the site is still functional and I don't see any of the specific slowdowns you've mentioned. It could be that your company is throttling connection attempts through its proxy, such that the site is stalling as it waits to load certain JS/CSS/images. This could explain why the desktop pictures thread, given its image-heavy nature, produces the effects you're seeing.

In short, yes IE6 performance is degraded but not by the amount you're experiencing, at least here: I suspect it's an internal IT issue, but I will look into this some more just in case there's an easy optimisation we've missed.

That would make sense for that particular thread, but yesterday and today when I tried to access that thread, it consistently locked up on page one. If I managed to get the thread to load and then look at any page other than 1, it would work. It isn't just that thread though, it's basically the whole site. I could be trying to look at a particularly long thread in say the 'general discussion' forum, and have the same performance issues.

I suppose the browser will be updated to at least IE7 at some point, but in the mean time, I guess I just have to keep closing the browser window when it locks up and then start over again.

That would make sense for that particular thread, but yesterday and today when I tried to access that thread, it consistently locked up on page one. If I managed to get the thread to load and then look at any page other than 1, it would work. It isn't just that thread though, it's basically the whole site. I could be trying to look at a particularly long thread in say the 'general discussion' forum, and have the same performance issues.

I suppose the browser will be updated to at least IE7 at some point, but in the mean time, I guess I just have to keep closing the browser window when it locks up and then start over again.

Having had to use IE6 in a work environment before, what caused page lockups for me was the fact that we use transparent PNG's which IE6 doesn't have support for. In order to use them, we have to employ some clever Javascript which then processes through each transparent PNG on the page - which could be causing your issue.

To see if that's the problem, you could temporarily disable javascript, and see if that allows you to load the page?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ahh, I didn't know that. It makes sense. I was thinking I would be fine with 50 hours, but 100 is close enough that I wouldn't feel like I am paying for more than I am using. I might check it out sometime.
    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
    • It does invite Linux because MS should have been improving their products all along these years instead chose to ignore the users now this year they’re making all of these improvements to their products where as Linux doesn’t have this kind of problems in fact it has gotten so good I can even play Windows games in Steam that I no longer ever needed Windows to carry on with my life, unlike you still use Windows and chose to try beat down down those who don't use Windows because they love their LG TV. (Surprisingly I actually own a 55” LED LG TV and it has been going strong for almost 14 years, longer than any Sony TV”)
    • As much as I love owning my own hardware, it's hard to argue with the value. I'm not a huge gamer, I'd actually be interested in a cheaper plan with limited monthly hours, or even a pay-by-the-hour plan.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!