Recommended Posts

Hi,

After a successful installation of Windows 7, I have the following irritating problem:

Some data needs to be entered after each boot or even more frequently.

For instance, the username/password for the "Dial-UP/VPN" Internet connection is not kept across boots.

The setting of the desktop is not kept (e.g., the size of desktop icons).

This seems to be a system-wide permissions' problem to write to a certain directory (e.g., a directory where the system keeps the data is read only).

Can you suggest in which directory/file Windows 7 keeps desktop settings and login credentials - so I could check this directory/file permissions ?

Thanks,

BR.

My Setup:

Product Edition: Windows 7 Ultimate

Operating System Major Version: 6

Operating System Minor Version: 1

Operating System Build Number: 7229

Service Pack: none

Computer: Lenovo y200 laptop

Motherboard Manufacturer: LENOVO

Motherboard Model: N/A

Motherboard Version: N/A

Bios Manufacturer: LENOVO

Bios Version: 70TU20LC

Bios Release Date: 09/01/2006

Bios Release: 255.255

Processor Architecture: Intel

Processor Level: Pentium Pro/Pentium II/Later

Processor Revision: Model 15 Stepping 6

Number Of Processors: 2

Manufacturer CPU 0: GenuineIntel

Processor Name CPU 0: Intel® Core2 CPU L7200 @ 1.33GHz

Approximate Clock Rate CPU 0: 1330 MHz

Manufacturer CPU 1: GenuineIntel

Processor Name CPU 1: Intel® Core2 CPU L7200 @ 1.33GHz

Approximate Clock Rate CPU 1: 1330 MHz

Floating Point Emulated: No

Floating Point Precision Errata: No

Compare & Exchange Double OP Available: Yes

MMX Instructions Available: Yes

XMMI Instructions Available: Yes

AMD 3D-Now Instructions Available: No

Page Size: 4,096 bytes (4.00 KB)

Allocation Unit: 65,536 bytes (64.00 KB)

Minimum Application Address: 65,536

Maximum Application Address: 2,147,418,111

Slow Machine: No

why are you using such an old and unofficial Windows 7 build? Use the RC (Build 7100) or RTM (Build 7600)

Hi Andre,

Would RC (Build 7100) or RTM (Build 7600) allow me to do an upgrade install from my Windows 7 Ultimate 6.1.7229 ?

  • If the answer is yes, I'll try and get one of them.
  • If the answer is no, then I'm "using such an old and unofficial Windows 7 build" as it'd be too time consuming to do a clean install, and then re-inslall and configure (the OS and) all and my software packages.

Bye,

BR.

Hi Andre,

Would RC (Build 7100) or RTM (Build 7600) allow me to do an upgrade install from my Windows 7 Ultimate 6.1.7229 ?

  • If the answer is yes, I'll try and get one of them.
  • If the answer is no, then I'm "using such an old and unofficial Windows 7 build" as it'd be too time consuming to do a clean install, and then re-inslall and configure (the OS and) all and my software packages.

Bye,

BR.

Just to let you know that the RTM build fixed quite a few bugs, quite possibly your problem too. If you were a real beta tester then you know that a clean install was only a matter of time, especially when the shutdown timer kicks in.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!