Dragon Age Performance


Recommended Posts

Just wondering if I could hear some of your guys system specs and what kinda performance your getting in Dragon Age so I can gauge if mines running well.

From the look of the gfx I kinda expected to get a little bit more performance out of my system even though it's starting to get pretty old.

At 1440x900 with high detail, 2xAA and 8xAF I get 20-30fps outdoors and 30-50fps in the dungeons. I was kinda hopping to get >40fps in all areas but thinking maybe my CPU is holding it back. With AA and AF turned off I gain about 1-2 more frames.

Specs are x2 7750+, 9600gt and 2gigs of ram on Windows 7, no background apps or services running.

Not the end of the world, games still completely playable.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/848032-dragon-age-performance/
Share on other sites

I run everything maxed out and average about 35fps but doesn't bother as long as it does not get anywhere near 25. Anything above that is not noticeable to the human eye.

Game settings:

2hdw206.jpg

My system:

Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 (3M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1066 MHz FSB)

Memory: (RAM) 4,00 GB

Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT (512MB Ram)

Edited by MindTrickz

Not sure how much FPS I get (if anyone can tell me how to display FPS that'd be great) but it's completely smooth and don't notice any slow downs. Have settings maxed out at 1680x1050 res (tried 1920x1080 on 52" TV as well). Load times are short, just a few seconds most times, maybe 10 seconds max. Don't have the game running on my SSD though. Specs are in my sig.

I run everything maxed out and average about 35fps but doesn't bother as long as it does not get anywhere near 25. Anything above that is not noticeable to the human eye.

Thanks guys, load times a lightning fast atm, I guess that could increase as my saves become more complicated.

That's not entirely true about 25fps. 25fps i considered to be smooth, but from opinion (and i know alot of others too) I can easily notice the difference between say 30fps and 50fps. It gets hard to distingiush after about 45fps for me.

Game is usually sweet for me, but annoying when it occaisonally drops to 20fps for a few secs.

There is a known memory leak in the PC version. Upon first starting the game, the load times are around 1 min or less and everything is super smooth. About 30 mins to 1 hour in, performance will start to degrade. Load times will jump to anywhere in the 5 min mark, and the frame rate will start to suffer.

They are still looking into it, but there is info on the forums already.

Thanks guys, load times a lightning fast atm, I guess that could increase as my saves become more complicated.

That's not entirely true about 25fps. 25fps i considered to be smooth, but from opinion (and i know alot of others too) I can easily notice the difference between say 30fps and 50fps. It gets hard to distingiush after about 45fps for me.

Game is usually sweet for me, but annoying when it occaisonally drops to 20fps for a few secs.

It also depends on the game/monitor I think. Like in CS1.6 I can notice the difference between 60FPS and 100FPS quite easily. Everything seems to move faster at 100FPS. I also uncapped my FPS in Call of Duty 4 and noticed the same thing as well. If someone were to switch between them without me knowing what the actual FPS was I would be able to tell.

It also depends on the game/monitor I think. Like in CS1.6 I can notice the difference between 60FPS and 100FPS quite easily. Everything seems to move faster at 100FPS. I also uncapped my FPS in Call of Duty 4 and noticed the same thing as well. If someone were to switch between them without me knowing what the actual FPS was I would be able to tell.

How often does your monitor refresh? I mean, aren't you only technically limited to the frames per second your monitor can actually throw out? Based on that, I would assume you would see no difference between 60 and 100fps if your monitor only throws out 60 frames per second in general.

Unless I'm mistaken, then please correct me on this one.

The only thing that annoyed me was the load times... Sometimes I waited 5 minutes or more to load an area... I was constantly exiting the game and entering it again which helped.

Theres a bug where the load times get longer the longer you play. I just restart my game adn they are very quick again. When I play for a long time they get VERY ling though.

There is a known memory leak in the PC version. Upon first starting the game, the load times are around 1 min or less and everything is super smooth. About 30 mins to 1 hour in, performance will start to degrade. Load times will jump to anywhere in the 5 min mark, and the frame rate will start to suffer.

They are still looking into it, but there is info on the forums already.

Yep. It also causes extremely long hitches before, during, and after character dialogs, as well as moderate hitches in bringing up menus. Rather annoying problem tbh. I can't help but wonder how they let such an obvious and glaring flaw slip by though. Did they actually have ANYONE testing and working on QA for the pc version of this title? Sure doesn't seem like it.

Damn I don't like what i'm hearing about these load times. I'm 10 hours in now and still everything is responsive and load times are short. Hopefully they patch this before I get much further :p

Is this problem on all systems all just some?

It doesn't get bad until you start going through a lot of area transitions. At the beginning there are very few of them. It gets progressively worse the longer you play without restarting the game. Most of the time it's not that noticeable if you only play a couple of hours at a time.

Most of the time it's not that noticeable if you only play a couple of hours at a time.

That explains why I'm not seeing it yet.

I'm running DA on an old fan-less 7600GS. Coupled with the heatwave that's been plaguing us the past couple weeks, it's the perfect recipe for disaster. The sucker overheated after running on "normal" quality for 15 minutes (on the char customization screen!!)

I'm now running it windowed, 1280x960, at lowest setting. At least it will now run for around 3 hours before reaching 90oC; at which point I shut the game off and do other stuff :p

Ah I see that's not too bad then, i usually don't play for more than 2-3 hours at a time.

Lol greenmartian at least your 7600gs runs it at all. Although your shouldn't get any performance gain/ heat decrease running in a window over fullscreen. It's just the same resolution anyways.

Although your shouldn't get any performance gain/ heat decrease running in a window over fullscreen. It's just the same resolution anyways.

Not really. Fullscreen means running on 1920x1080.

Besides I like playing windowed. I can sneak a chat or two in between loading / area transitions. Or check the status of my neowin threads :p

Ok I suppose if you want to keep the pixel ratio correct you would need to run in a window. But fullscreen can be whatever resolution you want. I'd much rather for instance play 1024x769 stretched to fullscreen over a window, windows in the background would just put me off.

I know what ya mean with chatting etc. I used to do the same when I played Wow and i'd always end up getting distracted typing something in here for like 15mins then going back to the game and everyone in my partys like "OOOYYY DICKKKHEAD!!" lol

Damn I feel like I should be getting a wee bit more performance, might OC my gfx and CPU a little tonight and see if that helps. I really want it to stay over 30 plus at the moment I have vsync turned off because it's usually hovering round 27 outdoors so the v sync drops it to 25 or even 20 sometimes.

Tried it at medium detail with no AA and still get the same frames I rekon my CPU is the limiter.

Damn I feel like I should be getting a wee bit more performance, might OC my gfx and CPU a little tonight and see if that helps. I really want it to stay over 30 plus at the moment I have vsync turned off because it's usually hovering round 27 outdoors so the v sync drops it to 25 or even 20 sometimes.

Tried it at medium detail with no AA and still get the same frames I rekon my CPU is the limiter.

It's your video card too. The GeForce 9600GT is somewhat dated, even more-so in terms of performance. From what I remember from benchmarks, it's on par with the Radeon HD 3870.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 by Razvan Serea Run programs in a sandbox to prevent malware from making permanent changes to your PC. Sandboxie allows you to run your browser, or any other program, so that all changes that result from the usage are kept in a sandbox environment, which can then be deleted later. Sandboxie is a sandbox-based isolation software for 32- and 64-bit Windows NT-based operating systems. It is being developed by David Xanatos since it became open source, before that it was developed by Sophos (which acquired it from Invincea, which acquired it earlier from the original author Ronen Tzur). It creates a sandbox-like isolated operating environment in which applications can be run or installed without permanently modifying the local or mapped drive. An isolated virtual environment allows controlled testing of untrusted programs and web surfing. Sandboxie is available in two flavors Plus and Classic. Both have the same core components, this means they have the same level of security and compatibility. What's different is the user interface the Plus build has a modern Qt based UI which supports all new features that have been added since the project went open source. The Classic build has the old no longer developed MFC based UI, hence it lacks support for modern features, these features can however still be used when manually configured in the Sandboxie.ini. Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 release notes: Added added DisableCustomTitleOpt=[process,][y|n] to allow [#] sandboxie title markers on custom-titlebar windows (Delphi VCL, Qt, Electron) that were previously skipped to prevent DWM repaint CPU loops #5387 Changed updated bundled ImDisk driver to 3.0.2 #5419 Fixed fix Suppress logs for expected non-user SIDs #5422 SbieSvc.exe: SBIE2218/2219 error when run program as administrator #5417 fixed explorer.exe crashes in Application Compartment when Huorong Security is installed #5423 Download: Sandboxie Plus (64-bit) | 23.5 MB (Open Source) Download: Sandboxie Classic (64-bit) | 3.0 MB Links: Sandboxie Website | GitHub | ARM64 | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Christian Maas' XVI32 is a nice (and very small) hex editor. Speaking of hex editors, many years ago a colleague and I who both worked at Tribal Voice managed to edit a copy of the company's PowWow instant messaging client to make it behave better now that all of its lookup servers and other server-side tech was gone.  The program didn't support NAT (RFC-3022 was introduced in January 2001, the same time Tribal Voice was shuttered), but it still worked okay if you manually set up port-forwarding on your router.  The server at http://powwow.jazy.net/ hosts a copy (usual warnings about downloading and running untrusted code from random internet servers apply). I occasionally use some tools like Funduc Software's Search and Replace and Application Mover when I need to make mass-edits to text-based files or move programs with a hard-coded installation directories, respectively.  When I need to figure out the exact LCD panel inside of a laptop, EnTech Taiwan's Monitor Asset Manager is my go-to tool for that purpose. JD Design's website (now hosted on github.io) has a number of interesting freeware and shareware utilities.  I used to use their TouchPro utility to set the file timestamps on software I was mastering to match its version number (e.g., version 3.00 of a program had all of its files dates set to 3:00AM, and so forth). Karenware has a number of interesting freeware utilities, too. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • I still use HexChat! Not really as ancient as the 1994 AutoCAD above my post, but I have never found anything better to replace it. Yes we still operate an IRC server https://www.neowin.net/irc/ 😛 
    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!