Dragon Age Performance


Recommended Posts

Just wondering if I could hear some of your guys system specs and what kinda performance your getting in Dragon Age so I can gauge if mines running well.

From the look of the gfx I kinda expected to get a little bit more performance out of my system even though it's starting to get pretty old.

At 1440x900 with high detail, 2xAA and 8xAF I get 20-30fps outdoors and 30-50fps in the dungeons. I was kinda hopping to get >40fps in all areas but thinking maybe my CPU is holding it back. With AA and AF turned off I gain about 1-2 more frames.

Specs are x2 7750+, 9600gt and 2gigs of ram on Windows 7, no background apps or services running.

Not the end of the world, games still completely playable.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/848032-dragon-age-performance/
Share on other sites

I run everything maxed out and average about 35fps but doesn't bother as long as it does not get anywhere near 25. Anything above that is not noticeable to the human eye.

Game settings:

2hdw206.jpg

My system:

Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 (3M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1066 MHz FSB)

Memory: (RAM) 4,00 GB

Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT (512MB Ram)

Edited by MindTrickz

Not sure how much FPS I get (if anyone can tell me how to display FPS that'd be great) but it's completely smooth and don't notice any slow downs. Have settings maxed out at 1680x1050 res (tried 1920x1080 on 52" TV as well). Load times are short, just a few seconds most times, maybe 10 seconds max. Don't have the game running on my SSD though. Specs are in my sig.

I run everything maxed out and average about 35fps but doesn't bother as long as it does not get anywhere near 25. Anything above that is not noticeable to the human eye.

Thanks guys, load times a lightning fast atm, I guess that could increase as my saves become more complicated.

That's not entirely true about 25fps. 25fps i considered to be smooth, but from opinion (and i know alot of others too) I can easily notice the difference between say 30fps and 50fps. It gets hard to distingiush after about 45fps for me.

Game is usually sweet for me, but annoying when it occaisonally drops to 20fps for a few secs.

There is a known memory leak in the PC version. Upon first starting the game, the load times are around 1 min or less and everything is super smooth. About 30 mins to 1 hour in, performance will start to degrade. Load times will jump to anywhere in the 5 min mark, and the frame rate will start to suffer.

They are still looking into it, but there is info on the forums already.

Thanks guys, load times a lightning fast atm, I guess that could increase as my saves become more complicated.

That's not entirely true about 25fps. 25fps i considered to be smooth, but from opinion (and i know alot of others too) I can easily notice the difference between say 30fps and 50fps. It gets hard to distingiush after about 45fps for me.

Game is usually sweet for me, but annoying when it occaisonally drops to 20fps for a few secs.

It also depends on the game/monitor I think. Like in CS1.6 I can notice the difference between 60FPS and 100FPS quite easily. Everything seems to move faster at 100FPS. I also uncapped my FPS in Call of Duty 4 and noticed the same thing as well. If someone were to switch between them without me knowing what the actual FPS was I would be able to tell.

It also depends on the game/monitor I think. Like in CS1.6 I can notice the difference between 60FPS and 100FPS quite easily. Everything seems to move faster at 100FPS. I also uncapped my FPS in Call of Duty 4 and noticed the same thing as well. If someone were to switch between them without me knowing what the actual FPS was I would be able to tell.

How often does your monitor refresh? I mean, aren't you only technically limited to the frames per second your monitor can actually throw out? Based on that, I would assume you would see no difference between 60 and 100fps if your monitor only throws out 60 frames per second in general.

Unless I'm mistaken, then please correct me on this one.

The only thing that annoyed me was the load times... Sometimes I waited 5 minutes or more to load an area... I was constantly exiting the game and entering it again which helped.

Theres a bug where the load times get longer the longer you play. I just restart my game adn they are very quick again. When I play for a long time they get VERY ling though.

There is a known memory leak in the PC version. Upon first starting the game, the load times are around 1 min or less and everything is super smooth. About 30 mins to 1 hour in, performance will start to degrade. Load times will jump to anywhere in the 5 min mark, and the frame rate will start to suffer.

They are still looking into it, but there is info on the forums already.

Yep. It also causes extremely long hitches before, during, and after character dialogs, as well as moderate hitches in bringing up menus. Rather annoying problem tbh. I can't help but wonder how they let such an obvious and glaring flaw slip by though. Did they actually have ANYONE testing and working on QA for the pc version of this title? Sure doesn't seem like it.

Damn I don't like what i'm hearing about these load times. I'm 10 hours in now and still everything is responsive and load times are short. Hopefully they patch this before I get much further :p

Is this problem on all systems all just some?

It doesn't get bad until you start going through a lot of area transitions. At the beginning there are very few of them. It gets progressively worse the longer you play without restarting the game. Most of the time it's not that noticeable if you only play a couple of hours at a time.

Most of the time it's not that noticeable if you only play a couple of hours at a time.

That explains why I'm not seeing it yet.

I'm running DA on an old fan-less 7600GS. Coupled with the heatwave that's been plaguing us the past couple weeks, it's the perfect recipe for disaster. The sucker overheated after running on "normal" quality for 15 minutes (on the char customization screen!!)

I'm now running it windowed, 1280x960, at lowest setting. At least it will now run for around 3 hours before reaching 90oC; at which point I shut the game off and do other stuff :p

Ah I see that's not too bad then, i usually don't play for more than 2-3 hours at a time.

Lol greenmartian at least your 7600gs runs it at all. Although your shouldn't get any performance gain/ heat decrease running in a window over fullscreen. It's just the same resolution anyways.

Although your shouldn't get any performance gain/ heat decrease running in a window over fullscreen. It's just the same resolution anyways.

Not really. Fullscreen means running on 1920x1080.

Besides I like playing windowed. I can sneak a chat or two in between loading / area transitions. Or check the status of my neowin threads :p

Ok I suppose if you want to keep the pixel ratio correct you would need to run in a window. But fullscreen can be whatever resolution you want. I'd much rather for instance play 1024x769 stretched to fullscreen over a window, windows in the background would just put me off.

I know what ya mean with chatting etc. I used to do the same when I played Wow and i'd always end up getting distracted typing something in here for like 15mins then going back to the game and everyone in my partys like "OOOYYY DICKKKHEAD!!" lol

Damn I feel like I should be getting a wee bit more performance, might OC my gfx and CPU a little tonight and see if that helps. I really want it to stay over 30 plus at the moment I have vsync turned off because it's usually hovering round 27 outdoors so the v sync drops it to 25 or even 20 sometimes.

Tried it at medium detail with no AA and still get the same frames I rekon my CPU is the limiter.

Damn I feel like I should be getting a wee bit more performance, might OC my gfx and CPU a little tonight and see if that helps. I really want it to stay over 30 plus at the moment I have vsync turned off because it's usually hovering round 27 outdoors so the v sync drops it to 25 or even 20 sometimes.

Tried it at medium detail with no AA and still get the same frames I rekon my CPU is the limiter.

It's your video card too. The GeForce 9600GT is somewhat dated, even more-so in terms of performance. From what I remember from benchmarks, it's on par with the Radeon HD 3870.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!