Pachter predicts $100 'Platinum' Xbox Live membership


Recommended Posts

Pachter predicts $100 'Platinum' Xbox Live membership

by David Hinkle on Sep 2nd 2010 9:30PM

xboxlive62210.jpg

The bump in cost for a Gold membership on Xbox Live is just the tip of the iceberg, according to game industry seer Michael Pachter. Predicting a $100 plan as the next evolutionary step in subscription options soon to be available to Xbox Live consumers, he told IndustryGamers reports that while the initial extra $10 "translates to around $100 to 150 million per year in additional revenue for Microsoft," the company will "reinvest at least this much in developing other new applications, and will roll out a premium service with $100 to 200 million worth of enhancements. If they can get 2 million users to switch from the $60 plan to the $100 plan, they'll make an extra $80 million a year, and can keep investing to try to grow that business."

It makes sense: Xbox Live is easily one of the biggest draws of the console and consumers have already shown they're willing to pay a premium for it. But even if Microsoft were to offer a "Platinum" service, what could justify what is comparably such a heftier price tag?

"For all I know, the Platinum plan might include virtual goods credits for various Microsoft games," Pachter posits. "If members could get specialized Halo armor or weapons worth the extra $40, they might be more willing to sign up, and it doesn't really cost Microsoft anything to offer things like that." You know what? We may know a few people willing to pay for something like that.

Source: Joystiq

Special 'Platinum-only' game items would fracture the community. If anything, it would have to be a purely cosmetic change (e.g. skins for weapons and armour).

well I think he predicted the $60 XBL a few months ago, didn't he?

Hmm it seems this Patcher brings bad luck to us :D

No, he never predicted that (as far as I know, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong; a quick Google search said no).

He's been predicting $100 Xbox Live for over a year, though.

I've got a prediction: Pachter is a dumbass.

Microsoft isn't retarded. They're increasing Live to 460 because people will pay for it. There's no market for a $100 Live service. It wouldn't be worth their time.

You never know. Activision proved that 20 million+ people didn't mind shelling out $15 for 3 rehashed maps, twice.

I wonder how far MS could push it. The defenders say it's only $0.83 extra a month with the new $60 price. What's so bad with an $1.66 extra a month at $70 or $2.49 extra a month at $80. I think a lot of people will still stump up to play online, that's pretty much the only reason people pay anyway. MS could chuck in a few more useless fluff apps, maybe a discount here and there. Too easy /o\

MS could include netflix/sky subscription, add in some extra streaming (i.e. spotify/pandora - with spotify's "unlimited service", or ITV/4OD player)), a fully fledged internet browser, and 400MS points a month for $100/?80 a year and they can really market it as a proper media entertainment device.

Think about it, you'd have all of the extra stuff you'd want from your cable subscription, which you usually end up paying like ?20 a month for anyway. You'd end up paying ?5 for spotify (a month). That's already ?25. Times that by twelve, and you'd already way over twice the amount you'd pay for a platinum service.

I personally think Microsoft could quite easily pull of a feat like that - I wouldn't mind chipping in a tenner each month for something like that (yes, I'd be paying ?120 a year, but who -really- calculates their finances like that, when you're always getting paid monthly?)

Hey, if they added IPTV to the 360 and made a $100 subscription that included it, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. Now that would be worth it. But unless they're adding MS points to the equation (that equals the amount they increase it by or more), then I can't see any other option being worth it at the moment.

MS could include netflix/sky subscription, add in some extra streaming (i.e. spotify/pandora - with spotify's "unlimited service", or ITV/4OD player)), a fully fledged internet browser, and 400MS points a month for $100/?80 a year and they can really market it as a proper media entertainment device.

Think about it, you'd have all of the extra stuff you'd want from your cable subscription, which you usually end up paying like ?20 a month for anyway. You'd end up paying ?5 for spotify (a month). That's already ?25. Times that by twelve, and you'd already way over twice the amount you'd pay for a platinum service.

I personally think Microsoft could quite easily pull of a feat like that - I wouldn't mind chipping in a tenner each month for something like that (yes, I'd be paying ?120 a year, but who -really- calculates their finances like that, when you're always getting paid monthly?)

Yup, if they ever created something like this, I'd sign up for it instantly.

?10 premium subsciption to Spotify each month is already ?120 a year. To have everything else thrown in is just a bonus!

Please post your market research.

I don't need to do market research, I can use common sense and the fact that Microsoft doesn't have any plans to start up a $100 service to figure these things out. Its not a viable option, the niche for that kind of service isn't large enough to make it worth it just yet.

I don't mean to throw out any legitimate research if there is any, but given that Pachter doesn't have any himself, I don't feel too bad about making my own predictions.

Hey, if they added IPTV to the 360 and made a $100 subscription that included it, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. Now that would be worth it. But unless they're adding MS points to the equation (that equals the amount they increase it by or more), then I can't see any other option being worth it at the moment.

Actually, Microsoft does offer IPTV for the 360, but only on IPTV systems that use their own Mediaroom software, and only on two providers right now; BT Vision in the UK, and Telus Optik TV in west-coast Canada. Though there are plans to introduce it on AT&T's U-Verse soon though. Heck to promote it, Telus has been giving away Xbox 360 S consoles to new internet/TV subscribers as an incentive.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!