Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versi


Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versions  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you have File History feature or both File History and Previous Versions

    • File History
    • File History but leave Previous Versions as it is


Recommended Posts

So by now you must have read that Windows 8 is going to have a File History feature (called History Vault in the earlier builds) but it's supposed to work only with external/removable drives. In comparison, Previous Versions works today with local drives including the installed Windows partition so you don't have to have removable drive attached to use this feature. In the Windows 8 Developer Preview, Previous Versions doesn't seem to exist. Now I know many bits and pieces are missing in this version, so we don't know if Microsoft is going to replace Previous Versions with File History but what would you rather have? Both or only File History? Because having a removable drive always attached is not always possible and especially if it's a flash drive, it will wear out over time.

  • 4 weeks later...

Bump in case no one has read this topic, this is a Windows 8 issue. Looks like Previous Versions is going away for local disks and replaced by File History (History Vault) but only for removable disks. Or is that no one uses Previous Versions because everyone is dual booting with XP (which makes Previous Versions not work) or everyone is stuck with Windows 7 Home Premium?

  • 3 months later...

Directly from Microsoft's Windows and Windows Server Developer Preview Compatibility Cookbook: http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=27416

Volume Shadow Copy Service UI Removed

Platform

Clients ? Windows Developer Preview

Servers ? Windows Server Developer Preview

Description

Earlier versions of Window employed the Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS). VSS is a service that exposes a set of COM APIs that implements a framework to allow volume backups to be performed on file servers while apps on a system continue to write to the volumes. It does this by creating restore points or ?shadow copies? of file share data. In Windows 7 users could create and schedule shadow copies and later use them to restore previous versions of individual files from a shadow copy.

This feature was available in the Windows Explorer as ?Previous Versions?.

User triggered shadow copies were rarely used and negatively impacted the overall Windows performance. In Windows Developer Preview, the ability to create or schedule a shadow copy was removed. As a result the ?Previous Versions? feature in the Windows Explorer became obsolete and was removed too.

Thus, users can no longer create shadow copies from which to restore files.

Manifestation

The Previous Versions option no longer exists in the Windows Explorer Properties menu.

Windows 7 Backup and Restore Deprecated

Platform

Clients ? Windows Developer Preview

Servers ? N/A

Description

While there is no behavioral change to Backup and Restore, this function is being deprecated and will not be updated. It was rarely used and its functionality has been replaced by the new File History feature. It will ship in Windows Developer Preview and enthusiasts who upgraded from Windows 7 to Windows Developer Preview or depend on Backup and Restore or disk image backup will be still able to use it. However, all access points to Backup and Restore, with the exception of the Control Panel, have been removed

We do not recommend using both features at the same time. File History checks if Backup schedule exists and is active and if it finds one, it will not let users to turn it on.

Manifestation

Workflows may be interrupted and documentation that refers to the previous method for accessing the Windows Backup and Restore feature will need to be updated to reflect these changes.

Mitigation of Impact

Apps that might trigger Backup and Restore should be rewritten to check if File History is on and let users choose their preferred method.

The File History feature in the Developer Preview has replaced Previous Versions and it is once again a case of a feature replacing an existing one which worked nicely and the new one does only half the things of the old one. File History should have complemented Previous Versions. File History seems similar to OS X's Time Machine which *requires* an external drive whereas Previous Versions made use of local hard drive space where older shadow copies were created automatically and transparently and could be quickly deleted should disk space be required. Which means now anyone without a removable drive is going to lose the Previous Versions feature when he "upgrades" to Windows 8.

They say in the document above "User triggered shadow copies were rarely used and negatively impacted the overall Windows performance." which is simply not true or correct. User did not have to trigger shadow copies in the first place as system restore automatically created shadow copies at periodic intervals and I was able to restore any file from Previous Versions.

  • 4 weeks later...

Ugh I Just noticed this while trying out the Consumer Preview. This is one of the first removed features that xpclient complains about that I think is actually useful. I don't see why they had to remove this! It was invaluable. Playing with the CP, I am actually more inclined to leave my desktop running Windows 7 than before. I thought the Developer Preview was just missing things because it was such an early build, but it really doesn't seem that a whole lot has changed.

I don't want to use removable or network drives to keep file histories. My desktop has 4 internal drives, that's enough. Apparently you can use local drives if you refer to them using their UNC path, but that's still annoying. You can't keep file histories of files on their respective drives. You also need to keep all the folders you want backed up in a library. I never liked the libraries, I like using folders.

Windows 8 can access previous versions if you're browsing a Windows 7 shared folder. The Volume Shadow Copy service is still there, I wonder if someone can re-enable this functionality. It's a shame that Microsoft is dumbing down Windows. I usually quickly switch to the latest version but Windows 8 has worried and wondering if it's even worth the hassle.

EDIT: It seems that the volume shadow functionality is still completely intact! Using ShadowExplorer I can browse old versions and deleted files. So they only removed the tab used to browse previous versions. How stupid. This doesn't work perfectly, though. I tried copying a large folder out of a shadow copy onto the same drive the shadow copy was from, and in the middle of the process it seems the old shadow copy it was from was removed to make room. If you're going to be using this, export the files to a different drive so that they still exist while copying.

Browsing the Windows 8 computer over the network and going to previous versions does not show any previous versions, though.

Really dumb IMO. Windows 8 was designed to support tablet devices, but by removing previous versions, now you have to carry an external storage device to get the same functionality. Tablets are meant to be portable, who the heck wants to carry an extra drive around so they can recover an old version of a file?

I just realized that a nice workaround for this is you can share the local volumes and then point the File History feature to use the locally shared volume. So it's not really a removed feature as long as it works for shared local volumes. Share permissions can be locked down to only "System".

You can't choose to have the files backed up on their respective drives, though, can you? You have only one repository used for file history, and using a UNC path that "network" location can be the very same computer. It really bugs me that the shadow copies are still completely there, they just don't let you retrieve old files from them. You can get the files out using ShadowExplorer, though.

What's weird is according to Microsoft the shadow copies are not persistent and the volume shadow copy service can only be used to create a backup. But without persistent shadow copies, how is system restore supposed to work? I hope they gimp it no further between now and the release.

It looks like File History is only for certain file types (documents, music, videos and pictures) in Libraries and desktop and browser favorites. Previous Versions worked for any generic file type in any folder. One annoyance though of Previous Versions was that if you dual booted with XP (for whatever reason), they would all be deleted (because of an incompatibility with NT5.x and NT6.x).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!