Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



The demonization of Iran


39 replies to this topic * * * * * 1 votes

#1 +zhiVago

    Ideas are bulletproof.

  • 7,136 posts
  • Joined: 04-October 01
  • Location: Eurasian Union

Posted 07 December 2011 - 17:33

Quote

The demonization of Iran

by Patrick Cockburn

The demonization campaign against Iran has the earmarks of a prelude for a military attack by the U.S. and Israel against Iran. The propaganda is very similar to that heaped upon Iraq’s Saddam Hussein in 2002. In both cases, an isolated state with limited resources is portrayed as posing a genuine threat to the region and the world.

Iran has long been denounced in Washington as the source of much of the evil in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia and its Sunni allies see the hand of Tehran behind protests in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia’s oil-rich Eastern Province. As the last US forces leave Iraq by the end of the year, there are dire warnings of Iraq becoming an Iranian pawn.

This demonization of Iran at times seems to set the stage for a military attack on Iran by the US and Israel. The propaganda build-up is very similar to that directed against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in 2002. In both cases, an isolated state with limited resources is presented as a real danger to the region and the world. Unlikely and sometimes comical conspiracy theories are given official credence, such as the supposed plot of an Iranian-American used-car dealer in Texas teaming up with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington. Iran’s nuclear program is identified as a threat in much the same way as Saddam Hussein’s non-existent WMD.

It therefore came as a shock when the distinguished Egyptian-American lawyer Cherif Bassiouni, who led the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry into this year’s unrest, said flatly in his 500-page report last week that there is no evidence of Iranian involvement in events in Bahrain. This had been a core belief of Bahrain’s royal family and the monarchs of the Gulf. Fear of Iranian armed intervention was Bahrain’s justification for calling in a 1,500-strong Saudi-led military force on March 14 of this year before it drove demonstrators from the streets. Bahrain even got Kuwaiti naval vessels to patrol the coast of the island in case Iran should try to deliver weapons to the Shia pro-democracy protesters.

No doubt the kings and emirs of the Gulf sincerely believe their own conspiracy theories. Many of those tortured during the brutal repression in Bahrain have since given evidence that their torturers repeatedly asked them about their links to Iran. Middle-aged hospital consultants were forced to sign confessions admitting that they were members of an Iranian revolutionary plot. After accepting the Bassiouni report, King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa said that, though his government could not produce clear evidence, Tehran’s role was evident to “all who have eyes and ears”.

Edited by Neobond, 08 December 2011 - 11:29.
Full article copy/paste not allowed



#2 DocM

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 11,277 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 07 December 2011 - 17:34

Iran doesn't need anyone to demonize them - they're doing a fine job all by themselves.

#3 humanz.

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,581 posts
  • Joined: 04-November 09
  • Location: United States of America
  • OS: Windows 7/Gentoo

Posted 07 December 2011 - 17:36

View PostDocM, on 07 December 2011 - 17:34, said:

Iran doesn't need anyone to demonize them - they're doing a fine job all by themselves.

The U.S put the current regime in charge during the 70s and the Shah, what are you talking about?

#4 jakem1

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 5,439 posts
  • Joined: 17-November 06

Posted 07 December 2011 - 17:40

I read today that it's 300 years since Iran started a war. Compare that to the US and it's pretty clear who the rogue nation is.

#5 DocM

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 11,277 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 07 December 2011 - 17:43

View PostSonic., on 07 December 2011 - 17:36, said:

The U.S put the current regime in charge during the 70s and the Shah, what are you talking about?

Everything that's happened since since Carter The Stupid let the mullahs take over in 1979.

#6 +Xinok

    Resident Reresident

  • 3,426 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 04
  • Location: Shikaka
  • OS: Windows 7 x64
  • Phone: Galaxy S3 (Wicked ROM)

Posted 07 December 2011 - 20:11

View PostDocM, on 07 December 2011 - 17:34, said:

Iran doesn't need anyone to demonize them - they're doing a fine job all by themselves.
To repeat what I've stated before, "The United States is responsible for turning Iran into what it is today".

#7 DocM

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 11,277 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 07 December 2011 - 20:19

Just like when you have to put down your dog if it goes mad; how it got that way is irrelevant, it still has to go down. The rest is just arm waving.

#8 mattking

    Look, he posted again!

  • 282 posts
  • Joined: 02-August 02

Posted 07 December 2011 - 20:19

I think it's also important to remember that there is a massive distinction between the Iranian government and the Iranian people.

#9 DocM

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 11,277 posts
  • Joined: 31-July 10
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 07 December 2011 - 20:21

ABSOLUTELY!! They're being hurt the most, so far.

#10 +Xinok

    Resident Reresident

  • 3,426 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 04
  • Location: Shikaka
  • OS: Windows 7 x64
  • Phone: Galaxy S3 (Wicked ROM)

Posted 08 December 2011 - 00:42

View PostDocM, on 07 December 2011 - 20:19, said:

Just like when you have to put down your dog if it goes mad; how it got that way is irrelevant, it still has to go down. The rest is just arm waving.
It's not just Iran, but Iraq and Afghanistan as well. The US supported Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war, only turning on him when he became an inconvenience. The US used Afghans to fight the Soviets, then just left them to fester. The US is responsible for creating so much wrong in this world, so if any government needs to be "put down"...

#11 1941

    Banned

  • 18,175 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 06

Posted 08 December 2011 - 00:45

View PostXinok, on 07 December 2011 - 20:11, said:


To repeat what I've stated before, "The United States is responsible for turning Iran into what it is today".

How so? The US needs to be put down?

#12 +Xinok

    Resident Reresident

  • 3,426 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 04
  • Location: Shikaka
  • OS: Windows 7 x64
  • Phone: Galaxy S3 (Wicked ROM)

Posted 08 December 2011 - 00:57

View PostGrinder, on 08 December 2011 - 00:45, said:

How so? The US needs to be put down?
This documentary sums it up pretty well.

https://www.youtube....B4076994D77EA06

#13 1941

    Banned

  • 18,175 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 06

Posted 08 December 2011 - 01:08

View PostXinok, on 08 December 2011 - 00:57, said:

This documentary sums it up pretty well.

https://www.youtube....B4076994D77EA06

Maybe if one is a terrorist. What I see is hogwash propaganda. I remermnber this much better:

http://www.youtube.c...d&v=lkrtSIPgv1E

Posted Image

http://www.historygu...age_crisis.html


On November 4, 1979, radical Iranian students seized the United States Embassy complex in the Iranian capital of Tehran. The immediate cause of this takeover was the anger many Iranians felt over the U.S. President Jimmy Carter allowing the deposed former ruler of Iran, Shah Reza Pahlavi, to enter the U.S. for medical treatment. In Iran, this was believed to be an opening move leading up an American-backed return to power by the Shah. The crisis which followed this seizure created a near state of war, ruined Jimmy Carter's presidency, and began an environment of hostility between America and Iran which continues to this day.

Though fear of an American-backed return by the Shah was the publicly stated reason, the true cause of the seizure was the long-standing U.S. support for the Shah's government. Reza Pahlavi ruled Iran from 1941 to 1979, with a brief period of exile in 1953 when he fled to Italy due to a power struggle with Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. Because Mossadegh's policies and announcements created concern over access to Iranian oil, oil prices, and possible Soviet influence in Iran, the United States and British intelligence services aided Iranian military officers in a coup to overthrow the Prime Minister. After his return to power, the Shah established a very close alliance with the United States. The U.S. supplied weapons, training, and technical knowledge that aided the Shah in modernizing his country. However, the Shah ruled as a dictator, using SAVAK, his secret police, to terrorize his political enemies. The Shah was opposed by both the Marxist Tudeh Party, and by fundamentalist Islamic leaders who believed his policies and his reliance on the Americans were corrupting Iranian society.

#14 Soulsiphon

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,688 posts
  • Joined: 29-May 10

Posted 08 December 2011 - 01:20

View PostDocM, on 07 December 2011 - 17:34, said:

Iran doesn't need anyone to demonize them - they're doing a fine job all by themselves.

My first reaction when I read the title.

View PostXinok, on 08 December 2011 - 00:42, said:

It's not just Iran, but Iraq and Afghanistan as well. The US supported Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war, only turning on him when he became an inconvenience. The US used Afghans to fight the Soviets, then just left them to fester. The US is responsible for creating so much wrong in this world, so if any government needs to be "put down"...

You're more than welcome to try. Just don't cry when you, your children, and everything you hold dear are scorched.

View PostXinok, on 07 December 2011 - 20:11, said:

To repeat what I've stated before, "The United States is responsible for turning Iran into what it is today".

Not quite. It's not a parking lot...yet.

#15 Tech Star

    Ron Paul 2012

  • 10,521 posts
  • Joined: 24-November 04
  • Location: California, USA

Posted 08 December 2011 - 01:36

View PostGrinder, on 08 December 2011 - 01:08, said:

-snip-

They did that TO SEND A MESSAGE that the American government was ABUSING their power and thought they could do whatever they wanted. The Iranian's don't hate the people in the US or any place in the world. They hate the government.

Quote

http://en.wikipedia....1979_revolution[/url]]On November 4, 1979, the revolutionary group Muslim Student Followers of the Imam's Line, angered that the recently deposed Shah had been allowed into the United States, occupied the American embassy in Tehran and took American diplomats hostage. The 52 American diplomats were held hostage for 444 days.

In Iran, the incident was seen by many as a blow against American influence in Iran and the liberal-moderate interim government of Prime Minister Mehdi Bazargan, who opposed the hostage taking and resigned soon after. The hostage takers felt that their action was connected to the 1953 American-backed coup against the government of Prime Minister Mosaddeq.

"You have no right to complain, because you took our whole country hostage in 1953.”


said one of the hostage takers to Bruce Laingen, chief U.S. diplomat in Iran at the time. Some Iranians were concerned that the United States may have been plotting another coup against their country in 1979 from the American embassy.

Then do you also remember this:

http://en.wikipedia...._Air_Flight_655

Iran is doing nothing wrong. Their land and their lives. Who the **** is the world to tell them what they can do and can't do when the whole world is more corrupt than them. That's the whole point.