A Clockwork Orange [1971]


Recommended Posts

  • 6 months later...

It's one of my favourite films. The soundtrack is excellent, especially for the time. Obviously the special effects don't hold up too well - the driving scene(s) in particular - but I saw it recently on Blu-ray and the overall quality is excellent.

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

One of my favorite films ever, I even have the original soundtrack on Vinyl in my collection. Just a true masterpiece of visuals and sounds to create a truly disturbing, yet completely engulfing, experience.

I really may watch it today.

I never understood it, so I don't rate it high.

At it's simplest I believe it is about how people are a result of their environments and conditioning from said environments. Alex happens to be an ultra-violent sex-crazed deviant because of his environment.

It is also about people trying to change who they are.

Definitely one of those movies that people either love it or hate it.

Interesting enough I have read that the English version and American version of the original book actually had two different endings. With the American version being the less positive of the two.

Interesting enough I have read that the English version and American version of the original book actually had two different endings. With the American version being the less positive of the two.

I have also read the book with the English ending (which is just an extension on the American ending). A Clockwork Orange used to be one of my favorite films until I read the novel.

Don't get me wrong, the cinematography and score are beautiful. Although after reading the book the actor's characters are very hallow and lack depth that is portrayed in the book.

And I felt the English ending would have been amazing for the film, completing the 'coming of age' theme.

Typical film student answer.

Meanwhile neither the world or the movie world would have been very different if at all hasn't these movies existed.

Strange, Im not a film student.

And of course there is no way to determine your convenient answer.

I didn't say ou where. Just that's the typical answer they will give.

If we look at all the movie makers who say these are the most important movies in hsistory and how much it affected them, and then look at their movies. It's quite clear they mostly say that because its expected and their movies don't have a shred of these supposed inspirations in them.

These are so called intellectual movies who people like to say they like and inspire them because they are supposedly better then less "intellectual"movies(a theory I don't subscribe to either), meanwhile if we analyse it, we see that the less intellectual reader audience "simpler" movies have a much bigger real impact on the movie industry and even the world.

Yes for some the intellectual movies offers a better movie experience, like some prefer to read War and Peace over Tom Clancy. It doesn't make one better than the other.

I didn't say ou where. Just that's the typical answer they will give.

If we look at all the movie makers who say these are the most important movies in hsistory and how much it affected them, and then look at their movies. It's quite clear they mostly say that because its expected and their movies don't have a shred of these supposed inspirations in them.

These are so called intellectual movies who people like to say they like and inspire them because they are supposedly better then less "intellectual"movies(a theory I don't subscribe to either), meanwhile if we analyse it, we see that the less intellectual reader audience "simpler" movies have a much bigger real impact on the movie industry and even the world.

Yes for some the intellectual movies offers a better movie experience, like some prefer to read War and Peace over Tom Clancy. It doesn't make one better than the other.

You're scratching the surface with prejudge. It's not about intellectualism, if that was the case then Tarkovsky or Bergman movies would be the only measure sticks among the industry and Haneke would be the only director that matters today. That's not the case of course.

It's about cinematographic techniques, narrative strategies. How cinema is crafted today is a legacy by these movies and these directors. Just as war & epic movies camera work has been inspired by Kurosawa. That doesn't mean that these movies are Kurosawa-like.

I didn't say ou where. Just that's the typical answer they will give.

If we look at all the movie makers who say these are the most important movies in hsistory and how much it affected them, and then look at their movies. It's quite clear they mostly say that because its expected and their movies don't have a shred of these supposed inspirations in them.

These are so called intellectual movies who people like to say they like and inspire them because they are supposedly better then less "intellectual"movies(a theory I don't subscribe to either), meanwhile if we analyse it, we see that the less intellectual reader audience "simpler" movies have a much bigger real impact on the movie industry and even the world.

Yes for some the intellectual movies offers a better movie experience, like some prefer to read War and Peace over Tom Clancy. It doesn't make one better than the other.

I didn't say ou where. Just that's the typical answer they will give.

If we look at all the movie makers who say these are the most important movies in hsistory and how much it affected them, and then look at their movies. It's quite clear they mostly say that because its expected and their movies don't have a shred of these supposed inspirations in them.

These are so called intellectual movies who people like to say they like and inspire them because they are supposedly better then less "intellectual"movies(a theory I don't subscribe to either), meanwhile if we analyse it, we see that the less intellectual reader audience "simpler" movies have a much bigger real impact on the movie industry and even the world.

Yes for some the intellectual movies offers a better movie experience, like some prefer to read War and Peace over Tom Clancy. It doesn't make one better than the other.

Guy, you are doing exactly the same that you did comparing the Xbox360 Kinect Sensor against the PSeye, and I told you that you need to look beyond the specifications.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!