A Clockwork Orange [1971]


Recommended Posts

  • 6 months later...

It's one of my favourite films. The soundtrack is excellent, especially for the time. Obviously the special effects don't hold up too well - the driving scene(s) in particular - but I saw it recently on Blu-ray and the overall quality is excellent.

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

One of my favorite films ever, I even have the original soundtrack on Vinyl in my collection. Just a true masterpiece of visuals and sounds to create a truly disturbing, yet completely engulfing, experience.

I really may watch it today.

I never understood it, so I don't rate it high.

At it's simplest I believe it is about how people are a result of their environments and conditioning from said environments. Alex happens to be an ultra-violent sex-crazed deviant because of his environment.

It is also about people trying to change who they are.

Definitely one of those movies that people either love it or hate it.

Interesting enough I have read that the English version and American version of the original book actually had two different endings. With the American version being the less positive of the two.

Interesting enough I have read that the English version and American version of the original book actually had two different endings. With the American version being the less positive of the two.

I have also read the book with the English ending (which is just an extension on the American ending). A Clockwork Orange used to be one of my favorite films until I read the novel.

Don't get me wrong, the cinematography and score are beautiful. Although after reading the book the actor's characters are very hallow and lack depth that is portrayed in the book.

And I felt the English ending would have been amazing for the film, completing the 'coming of age' theme.

Typical film student answer.

Meanwhile neither the world or the movie world would have been very different if at all hasn't these movies existed.

Strange, Im not a film student.

And of course there is no way to determine your convenient answer.

I didn't say ou where. Just that's the typical answer they will give.

If we look at all the movie makers who say these are the most important movies in hsistory and how much it affected them, and then look at their movies. It's quite clear they mostly say that because its expected and their movies don't have a shred of these supposed inspirations in them.

These are so called intellectual movies who people like to say they like and inspire them because they are supposedly better then less "intellectual"movies(a theory I don't subscribe to either), meanwhile if we analyse it, we see that the less intellectual reader audience "simpler" movies have a much bigger real impact on the movie industry and even the world.

Yes for some the intellectual movies offers a better movie experience, like some prefer to read War and Peace over Tom Clancy. It doesn't make one better than the other.

I didn't say ou where. Just that's the typical answer they will give.

If we look at all the movie makers who say these are the most important movies in hsistory and how much it affected them, and then look at their movies. It's quite clear they mostly say that because its expected and their movies don't have a shred of these supposed inspirations in them.

These are so called intellectual movies who people like to say they like and inspire them because they are supposedly better then less "intellectual"movies(a theory I don't subscribe to either), meanwhile if we analyse it, we see that the less intellectual reader audience "simpler" movies have a much bigger real impact on the movie industry and even the world.

Yes for some the intellectual movies offers a better movie experience, like some prefer to read War and Peace over Tom Clancy. It doesn't make one better than the other.

You're scratching the surface with prejudge. It's not about intellectualism, if that was the case then Tarkovsky or Bergman movies would be the only measure sticks among the industry and Haneke would be the only director that matters today. That's not the case of course.

It's about cinematographic techniques, narrative strategies. How cinema is crafted today is a legacy by these movies and these directors. Just as war & epic movies camera work has been inspired by Kurosawa. That doesn't mean that these movies are Kurosawa-like.

I didn't say ou where. Just that's the typical answer they will give.

If we look at all the movie makers who say these are the most important movies in hsistory and how much it affected them, and then look at their movies. It's quite clear they mostly say that because its expected and their movies don't have a shred of these supposed inspirations in them.

These are so called intellectual movies who people like to say they like and inspire them because they are supposedly better then less "intellectual"movies(a theory I don't subscribe to either), meanwhile if we analyse it, we see that the less intellectual reader audience "simpler" movies have a much bigger real impact on the movie industry and even the world.

Yes for some the intellectual movies offers a better movie experience, like some prefer to read War and Peace over Tom Clancy. It doesn't make one better than the other.

I didn't say ou where. Just that's the typical answer they will give.

If we look at all the movie makers who say these are the most important movies in hsistory and how much it affected them, and then look at their movies. It's quite clear they mostly say that because its expected and their movies don't have a shred of these supposed inspirations in them.

These are so called intellectual movies who people like to say they like and inspire them because they are supposedly better then less "intellectual"movies(a theory I don't subscribe to either), meanwhile if we analyse it, we see that the less intellectual reader audience "simpler" movies have a much bigger real impact on the movie industry and even the world.

Yes for some the intellectual movies offers a better movie experience, like some prefer to read War and Peace over Tom Clancy. It doesn't make one better than the other.

Guy, you are doing exactly the same that you did comparing the Xbox360 Kinect Sensor against the PSeye, and I told you that you need to look beyond the specifications.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • https://www.tenforums.com/tuto...b-results-windows-10-a.html Check the comment dates. Some of them are as old as 2016.
    • I wonder how many are laid off for cost savings, and this being blamed on AI to make it sound less scary and bad, for a more positive "modern, with the times" spin for investors? Because Oracle is down 14% the past year. We're looking at a company struggling here. If AI would actually be working out so well for them that they can do massive layoffs, surely this would've been reflected the past year in their stock value?
    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!