Recommended Posts

Intel, Microsoft may start W8 tablets at 599 plus

An insistence on earlier pricing policies from Intel and Microsoft may put Windows 8 tablets out of contention, notebook PC builders getting into the field claimed Monday. Intel was reported by Digitimes contacts as unwilling to cut profit margins on its Clover Trail-based Atom chips, while Microsoft wasn't planning on trimming its Windows 8 price. As such, Intel-based Windows 8 tablets might start at a minimum $599 and scale up to $899, all well over the benchmark $499 price of the iPad.

The two sides may be facing an uncomfortable middle ground because of the nature of a "Wintel" PC, the insiders argued. If they do decide to cut prices on Clover Trail and Windows 8, they could build market share but would also be cutting prices on conventional PCs and cut profit across the board. Should Intel decline to cut prices, though, it may send some companies running to cheaper ARM-based tablets to get closer to an ideal price.

While strictly an observation, the tipsters saw these plus the Android situation as a confluence of multiple factors that would ultimately favor Apple. Along with Windows 8 tablets being too expensive, quad-core Android 4.0 tablets from ASUS, Lenovo, and possibly Samsung might only arrive on or after the rumored launch of the iPad 3 in March, overshadowing their efforts.

Windows 8 tablets themselves aren't due to show until the release of the OS roughly in the second half of the year, giving both Android and iOS ample lead time.

http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/01/16/intel.microsoft.may.start.w8.tablets.at.599.plus/#ixzz1jh1Pswxg

Microsoft has a big battle ahead to overcome the overwhelming popularity of the iPad on the tablet computing front, and its Intel-powered slates might be starting at a distinct disadvantage if a DigiTimesreport is to be believed. The site indicates that neither Intel nor Microsoft are willing to cut their prices to help manufacturers, the former providing the Clover Trail hardware and the latter the Windows 8software, which could see these machines starting at $599 and going way up from there. This could send manufacturers looking for lesser-expensive ARM-powered hardware, creating tablets incapable of executing the current gamut of x86 Windows software. Will users pay a premium for app compatibility as tablet prices on other platforms plummet? Just how attached are you to that copy of Wing Commander you've been hanging on to for decades?

Engadget

here;s the thing though... lets just say for its and shiggles.... people will buy a windows 8 arm tablet at the lower price point and since they've been sold the idea they can run desktop apps on it, will try to install photoshop or premiere on it and it wouldn't work (unless they compile an arm version) and get mad and return the tablets...

what if companies like adobe won't compile photoshop or premiere for arm devices?

I really hope the companies make this clear or people will be very dissapointed.

This was clearly expected.

Why would one purchase an ARM based device if He/She can get a full blown x86 tablet that will run legacy apps aswell.

Also. I know x86 devices will be thicker and offer lower battery life. But they also will sport bigger HDDs if this years tablets are to be followed whereas ARM tablets will offer smaller cap SSDs in the 64GB to 128GB range im dead sure!

If you look at how slow Microsoft moves...They are really are in trouble in the low end. In a lot of areas browser, mobile phone, search they either failing or not gaining traction. I think they really need a management shake-up. Of course this won't happen before windows 8 releases. But if it does not sell well....I think Ballmer as well as other management of microsoft could be in trouble.

Actually i dont agree with you if you mean their products are inferior.

Whether its Browser or Mobile Phones or Bing Search.

I use all of them and they compete with the very best and provide counter features if not the same.

What microsoft needs is to change their image.

They are not associated with people as for example Apple is.

They need to do that.

Redo their image in some way. Advertise the hell out of their products.. Specially Bing and WP7. Bing is amazing. They also have maps which are brilliant if you live in the US.

They need to expand it. Now i own a WP7 device but i have to use google maps because there are no bing maps for where i live.

The bing experience would be so much better only if i can use it.

They need to expand.. Globally. They focus on their customers in the US. what about the rest of the world?

I plan to develop apps for windows 8. But im sure i cant register from my country directly as a developer.

So they need to expand their services to the whole globe. And advertise it everywhere!

This was clearly expected.

Why would one purchase an ARM based device if He/She can get a full blown x86 tablet that will run legacy apps aswell.

because it would be cheaper to them... saving 200-400 bucks savings,.. would be a big deal to a lot of people...

What i meant was..

if i can buy a x86 for the same price as an ARM tablet.. why would i buy an ARM tablet?

ARM wouldve needed to further reduce their prices and that is not going to happen... in 2 years or so.

There are low price tablets but those have smaller screens or slower hardware.

What i meant was.. if i can buy a x86 for the same price as an ARM tablet.. why would i buy an ARM tablet? ARM wouldve needed to further reduce their prices and that is not going to happen... in 2 years or so. There are low price tablets but those have smaller screens or slower hardware.

Clearly ARM right now lost its purpose, ARM tablets where supposed to be cheap, far cheaper than an x86 tablet but... oh well, fashion seems to be getting into tablets and price with it.

yah I guess I was asking too much to have a windows 8 tablet to run x86 apps for 400 bucks or less ;-( mabye some day... ;-(

It honestly is... but I will totally pay up to $1500 for a tablet as long as it runs the application I want and works the way I want. i.e. I need to be able to run onenote and write on it with a pen.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

In short, you are saying that the ability to run real applications (or even light games) is worth no price premium whatever over an iDevice (iPad2, for example) or Android tablet or slate.

The SAMSUNG Series 7 is pricey due almost entirely to that i5 inside - it's overkill for a slate or tablet - and the price reflects that. It's priced like a notebook with the same CPU - i3, actually, would be a better choice if you wanted to lower the price. (And despite that seemingly high price, that's exactly what the Series 7 competes with; notebooks, not netbooks, which it simply embarrasses. It also beats several NOTEBOOKS like a big bass drum in a marching band.)

I respectfully disagree - tablets and slates that can run real applications have - and certainly deserve - a premium in terms of price over the iPad2 or any Android tablet.

If anything, it's ARM-based tablets and slates that don't deserve a price premium over either iPad2 or Android - because they are just as limited in terms of applications (due to the lack of ARM traditional applications).

Here's how I see the market breakdown: low-end tablets and slates (mostly Android)->midrange ARM-based tablets and slates (and the iPad2)->x86 tablets, slates, and Ultrabooks (the space currently occupied by high-end netbooks, which they will largely replace)->midrange notebooks->desktop-replacement notebooks->gaming notebooks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!