Recommended Posts

Intel, Microsoft may start W8 tablets at 599 plus

An insistence on earlier pricing policies from Intel and Microsoft may put Windows 8 tablets out of contention, notebook PC builders getting into the field claimed Monday. Intel was reported by Digitimes contacts as unwilling to cut profit margins on its Clover Trail-based Atom chips, while Microsoft wasn't planning on trimming its Windows 8 price. As such, Intel-based Windows 8 tablets might start at a minimum $599 and scale up to $899, all well over the benchmark $499 price of the iPad.

The two sides may be facing an uncomfortable middle ground because of the nature of a "Wintel" PC, the insiders argued. If they do decide to cut prices on Clover Trail and Windows 8, they could build market share but would also be cutting prices on conventional PCs and cut profit across the board. Should Intel decline to cut prices, though, it may send some companies running to cheaper ARM-based tablets to get closer to an ideal price.

While strictly an observation, the tipsters saw these plus the Android situation as a confluence of multiple factors that would ultimately favor Apple. Along with Windows 8 tablets being too expensive, quad-core Android 4.0 tablets from ASUS, Lenovo, and possibly Samsung might only arrive on or after the rumored launch of the iPad 3 in March, overshadowing their efforts.

Windows 8 tablets themselves aren't due to show until the release of the OS roughly in the second half of the year, giving both Android and iOS ample lead time.

http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/01/16/intel.microsoft.may.start.w8.tablets.at.599.plus/#ixzz1jh1Pswxg

Microsoft has a big battle ahead to overcome the overwhelming popularity of the iPad on the tablet computing front, and its Intel-powered slates might be starting at a distinct disadvantage if a DigiTimesreport is to be believed. The site indicates that neither Intel nor Microsoft are willing to cut their prices to help manufacturers, the former providing the Clover Trail hardware and the latter the Windows 8software, which could see these machines starting at $599 and going way up from there. This could send manufacturers looking for lesser-expensive ARM-powered hardware, creating tablets incapable of executing the current gamut of x86 Windows software. Will users pay a premium for app compatibility as tablet prices on other platforms plummet? Just how attached are you to that copy of Wing Commander you've been hanging on to for decades?

Engadget

here;s the thing though... lets just say for its and shiggles.... people will buy a windows 8 arm tablet at the lower price point and since they've been sold the idea they can run desktop apps on it, will try to install photoshop or premiere on it and it wouldn't work (unless they compile an arm version) and get mad and return the tablets...

what if companies like adobe won't compile photoshop or premiere for arm devices?

I really hope the companies make this clear or people will be very dissapointed.

This was clearly expected.

Why would one purchase an ARM based device if He/She can get a full blown x86 tablet that will run legacy apps aswell.

Also. I know x86 devices will be thicker and offer lower battery life. But they also will sport bigger HDDs if this years tablets are to be followed whereas ARM tablets will offer smaller cap SSDs in the 64GB to 128GB range im dead sure!

If you look at how slow Microsoft moves...They are really are in trouble in the low end. In a lot of areas browser, mobile phone, search they either failing or not gaining traction. I think they really need a management shake-up. Of course this won't happen before windows 8 releases. But if it does not sell well....I think Ballmer as well as other management of microsoft could be in trouble.

Actually i dont agree with you if you mean their products are inferior.

Whether its Browser or Mobile Phones or Bing Search.

I use all of them and they compete with the very best and provide counter features if not the same.

What microsoft needs is to change their image.

They are not associated with people as for example Apple is.

They need to do that.

Redo their image in some way. Advertise the hell out of their products.. Specially Bing and WP7. Bing is amazing. They also have maps which are brilliant if you live in the US.

They need to expand it. Now i own a WP7 device but i have to use google maps because there are no bing maps for where i live.

The bing experience would be so much better only if i can use it.

They need to expand.. Globally. They focus on their customers in the US. what about the rest of the world?

I plan to develop apps for windows 8. But im sure i cant register from my country directly as a developer.

So they need to expand their services to the whole globe. And advertise it everywhere!

This was clearly expected.

Why would one purchase an ARM based device if He/She can get a full blown x86 tablet that will run legacy apps aswell.

because it would be cheaper to them... saving 200-400 bucks savings,.. would be a big deal to a lot of people...

What i meant was..

if i can buy a x86 for the same price as an ARM tablet.. why would i buy an ARM tablet?

ARM wouldve needed to further reduce their prices and that is not going to happen... in 2 years or so.

There are low price tablets but those have smaller screens or slower hardware.

What i meant was.. if i can buy a x86 for the same price as an ARM tablet.. why would i buy an ARM tablet? ARM wouldve needed to further reduce their prices and that is not going to happen... in 2 years or so. There are low price tablets but those have smaller screens or slower hardware.

Clearly ARM right now lost its purpose, ARM tablets where supposed to be cheap, far cheaper than an x86 tablet but... oh well, fashion seems to be getting into tablets and price with it.

yah I guess I was asking too much to have a windows 8 tablet to run x86 apps for 400 bucks or less ;-( mabye some day... ;-(

It honestly is... but I will totally pay up to $1500 for a tablet as long as it runs the application I want and works the way I want. i.e. I need to be able to run onenote and write on it with a pen.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

Yess.. $1500 is too expensive . .

I very much like the Samsung slate 7 ..

Its pricey. But you get a dock with iy. A keyboard. And you get a pen. N that is sweet to actually use it. Great tablet for artists. I can't wait to buy it when windows 8 comes out. I trust Samsung with the hardware. But I wish we see such tablets for under 600. That will.totally eat android on the high end.

In short, you are saying that the ability to run real applications (or even light games) is worth no price premium whatever over an iDevice (iPad2, for example) or Android tablet or slate.

The SAMSUNG Series 7 is pricey due almost entirely to that i5 inside - it's overkill for a slate or tablet - and the price reflects that. It's priced like a notebook with the same CPU - i3, actually, would be a better choice if you wanted to lower the price. (And despite that seemingly high price, that's exactly what the Series 7 competes with; notebooks, not netbooks, which it simply embarrasses. It also beats several NOTEBOOKS like a big bass drum in a marching band.)

I respectfully disagree - tablets and slates that can run real applications have - and certainly deserve - a premium in terms of price over the iPad2 or any Android tablet.

If anything, it's ARM-based tablets and slates that don't deserve a price premium over either iPad2 or Android - because they are just as limited in terms of applications (due to the lack of ARM traditional applications).

Here's how I see the market breakdown: low-end tablets and slates (mostly Android)->midrange ARM-based tablets and slates (and the iPad2)->x86 tablets, slates, and Ultrabooks (the space currently occupied by high-end netbooks, which they will largely replace)->midrange notebooks->desktop-replacement notebooks->gaming notebooks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!