Recommended Posts

UFC143_04_JPG_large.jpg

And here we are at the 2nd PPV of the year and it looks AMAZING on paper. Hopefully it will deliver. Let's look at the card.

Preliminary card (Facebook)

Rafael Natal vs. Michael Kuiper - A guy who lost to Rich Attonito against a guy who's making his UFC debut at 11-0 but never fought outside of Z-league European promotions? Oh undercard.

Dan Stittgen vs. Stephen Thompson - See above but 5-0 and Z-League American Promotions.

Preliminary card (FX)

Matt Brown vs. Chris Cope - With a combined record of 17-13, this is the blueprint for a "loser gets cut fight". Brown is pretty much an eternally low-tier WW who's 1-4 in his last 5 fights, making us wonder how he hasn't been cut yet. Probably because he's been finished in all of those fights, providing material for highlight reels. Cope, on the other hand, didn't drop to LW like pretty much everyone on TUF and is also very low-tier. If he picks up 2 losses in a row, he'll surely find himself fighting for Tachi Palace.

Alex Caceres vs. Edwin Figueroa - Caceres aka Bruce Leeroy was a "star" on TUF (at least for Dana White) but kept getting raped at FW. Now he's trying to reinvent himself at BW and has already picked up a nice win over Cole Escovedo. He will face natural BW Jason Reinhardt who picked up a pretty brutal KO at UFC on Versus 5. Should be an interesting fight.

Matthew Riddle vs. Henry Martinez - Riddle didn't fight at UFC 141 due to an 11th hour illness. He comes in on "short" notice to fight newcomer Martinez. He always comes to band and is very interesting even in defeat. Should be fun.

Dustin Poirier vs. Max Holloway - I don't get this fight. Poirier is 11-1 and is pretty much a future title contender. Why is he fighting a 4-0 newcomer to the UFC? I know this fight has been changed a couple of times due to injury (first Koch and then Lamas) but wouldn't it be better just to scrap the fight instead of this? If Poirier wins (very likely) he stays in the same spot in the FW division. If he loses (like when he derrailed Grispi), the UFC loses a potential contender and a big potential fight against Koch (but gets a fight against Hominick). Holloway is getting thrown to the sharks.

Main card

Ed Herman vs. Clifford Starks - Prospect Starks gets to step up in competition against veteran Ed Herman. No relevance for the MW title picture at all but should provide an entertaining.... who am I kidding, this is going to end up in the judges scorecards.

Renan Bar?o vs. Scott Jorgensen - The future BW champion, Bar?o, gets to slay another Top 10 opponent in his path to the belt. Jorgensen is no slouch but after seeing what Bar?o did to Brad Pickett, I don't think he's got what it takes to stop him. Bar?o is strong, agressive, extremely well rounded and very fast. And he's the man that will finally replace The Decisionator Dominick Cruz.

Josh Koscheck vs. Mike Pierce - By MMAth, Pierce lost against Johny Hendricks so Koscheck, being a better wrestler and also having a big hand, should take this and start his climb back to WW contendership.

Roy Nelson vs. Fabricio Werdum - Werdum makes his way back to UFC and fights Big Country, who looked like a different fighter against Mirko. Nelson has the grappling credentials to tangle with Werdum on the ground and is a better striker so I'll give him the edge, provided he kept with his diet regime. Werdum may sometimes be passive and pull guard but his cardio is pretty good.

Nick Diaz vs. Carlos Condit - Needs no introduction really. First it was GSP vs Diaz, then GSP vs Condit, then Diaz again and now they're fighting eachother. I personally want Condit to win but I think Diaz will take it. Diaz's chin is solid granite and if Hardy can land that many punches on you, so can Diaz but harder. I hope I get it wrong.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1054926-ufc-143-diaz-vs-condit/
Share on other sites

Anyone who claims to be a fight fan and cannot stand the Diaz bros should second guess themselves - imo.

Why? It has nothing to do with their abilities, they're both just complete idiots and douche bags. Attitude and personality are more important than having a certain limited skill set.

Awww, Diaz is a little bitch and is leaving now because he lost. Yes, he chased Condit around the entire time, but the fact is, that is exactly what Condit trained for. He hit him so many times as he was escaping him. He was the rightful victor and Diaz can go **** himself.

Why? It has nothing to do with their abilities, they're both just complete idiots and douche bags. Attitude and personality are more important than having a certain limited skill set.

Rereading your comments made me delete my reply to you. You haven't a clue do you?

Rereading your comments made me delete my reply to you. You haven't a clue do you?

Why don't you fill me in because likes and dislikes are a fairly personal thing yeah? I'm not denying Nick Diaz is a very skilled fight. What I'm saying is I don't like him because he's a jackass. What do I need a clue about? Just look at the two previous posts above yours to see my point.

So keep being vague while trying to make a point and let me know how that works out for you.

That was overall a pretty great PPV. Watched pretty much all the fights.

Preliminary card (Facebook)

Rafael Natal vs. Michael Kuiper - Didn't watch.

Dan Stittgen vs. Stephen Thompson - What a KO. With his karate style, Thompson looked a lot like Machida. Quick punching rushes and versatile kicks, ending with that amazing kick that was an instant KO. He's 6-0 in MMA and was 57-0 as a Kickboxer but let's not get carried away. He's fights at WW, which is a pretty stacked division and, like Machida, he showed similar weak spots against also agressive attacks. His ground game also remains to be tested. He has a great BJJ pedigree but BJJ isn't MMA. Can he beat a strong top control wrestler? If he's brought along slowly, he can develop into a good WW fighter.

Preliminary card (FX)

Matt Brown vs. Chris Cope - Cope got KTFO by Brown. He never looked in the fight at all. His choice of fighting at WW instead of LW combined with his limited skills make him a great record padder. He should probably go get some more experience in the B-Leagues before returning (if ever) to the UFC. Brown picked up a much needed win but he's not out of the woods yet since he's still carrying a 2-3 record in his last 5. Maybe have him fight Stephen Thompson.

Alex Caceres vs. Edwin Figueroa - In normal circunstances, this fight would have been a 29-28 for Caceres. And it was. But the 2 point deduction cost him that. He did try to finish the fight after that because he knew it was his only chance at a win (or a 10-8 round) but Figueroa hanged in there and ended up getting the "win". Caceres also failed in some points because he always went for the RNC when the D'arce, Anaconda, Triangle or Armbar were available. As for the 2 point deduction, I still haven't made up my mind yet. The groin kicks were brutal and could have turned the tide of the fight. It was not like it was a repeated but bening foul like grabbing the shorts or the ocasional eye poke. One thing is certain, Caceres's drop to BW has massively improved his career and he'll live to fight another day.

Matthew Riddle vs. Henry Martinez - Martinez fights normally at LW (even at FW sometimes) and that was pretty clear. Riddle towered over him and used his massive size and reach advantage to get the W. Riddle came to bang as expected, the ending of the 2nd round is the hallmark of his style. He's an exciting fighter and will be fighting in the UFC for a long time. Martinez gets kudos for taking the fight on short notice and shoudl return to his natural weightclass for the next one.

Dustin Poirier vs. Max Holloway - Like I said, Holloway got eaten. I don't get why Hawaiians take pride in being full out fighters instead of, you know, smart strong fighters who win. Didn't he watch tape on Poirier? I expected him to lose but he could have at least showed some semblance of a game plan. He came out, guns blazing, throwing flying knees everywhere he could. Poirier did his thing and showed why he's a top contender for the FW title, adjusting his gameplan from striking to grappling and scoring a really slick submission. His transitions were pretty great and to adjust a triangle from guard into mount + armbar was impressive. His fight with Erik Koch needs to happen.

Main Card

Ed Herman vs. Clifford Starks - Thankfully I was wrong about this going to a decision. Starks looked absolutely massive compared to Ed Herman but his skillset is still developing. Despite trying to stiffle Herman against the cage, Herman made use of his experience and put the wrestler Starks on his back (triggering his "giving up the back" instincts)with an amazing throw and quickly got the mount. Back to the drawing board for Starks.

Renan Bar?o vs. Scott Jorgensen - Bar?o did what he does best, great all round game and a clear win. But the way in which he won left me doubting his chances at winning the belt. No doubt he's a Top 10 BW. No doubt he outrstuck and outgrappled Jorgensen. But the way he paced the fight and didn't push for the finish would only work into Dominick Cruz's style of fighting. Jorgensen got hit with a LOT of shots and kicks. He withstood them with ease but got hit nonetheless. Cruz's style of moving in and out and striking isn't going to threathen Bar?o but like we saw in the Main Event tonight, could be enough to get a decision win since Bar?o doesn't have powerfull wrestling to get Cruz imobilized. He will probably get one more fight before a title shot (since Faber and Cruz are doind TUF 15) so let's see what improvements and preparations he can make. All of this of course if Faber doesn't take the title from Cruz. In that case, since Bar?o is the BW Jos? Aldo, I predict TKO by leg kicks. I don't who will be his next dance partner since well, he already beat every BW ranked above him except Faber. With Benavidez dropping to FLW and Bowles coming in on a loss, I don't see who else his available to further his title aspirations. Maybe Miguel Torres? Jorgensen should fight Bowles.

Josh Koscheck vs. Mike Pierce - Meh. I was so put off by this fight that I don't even care to write something about it. Pierce isn't top tier material but he made Koscheck look, well, average. There were no OH! or OUCH! moments and it probably should have ended as a majority draw with the 1 point deduction Koscheck should have gotten for his constant pokes.

Roy Nelson vs. Fabricio Werdum - This fight reminded me of Edgar vs Maynard III. Werdum put an absolute beating on Nelson only to let off the gas pedal in the 2nd round. His cardio wasn't THAT good but he was hanging in there and surely had enough juice in the 2nd to finish the fight. Instead he moved around and almost got caught with a big right. In the end, he deserved the W but the win left a bad taste in my mouth. It's also amazing to see that, despite both fighters weighing in at 246, Werdum looked huge compared to Nelson. Nelson looked like Tim Boetsch at LHW, bloated and undersized. He should be fighting at least at LHW, MW would be perfect. Werdum comes back to the UFC with a win. And they will probably have him fight Mir next. Why I don't know, since Mir is pretty the only guy in the HW division right now that resembles a title contender. Either him or Mike Russow who's 4-0. I would have Werdum fight Cheick Kongo after he kills Mark Hunt.

Nick Diaz vs. Carlos Condit - MY MAN, THE NATURAL BORN KILLER, CARLOS CONDIT! :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: Condit proves that it's fighting smarter, not harder than wins fights. Being a Greg Jackson fighter, he knew the importance of a great gameplan for this fight. He also knew how Diaz's style works and worked around it. He wasn't going to win in a straight up brawl since Diaz's chin, like I said countless times, is pretty much solid granite. So he fought smart, kept his distance, used his kicks and foot movement and didn't allow Diaz's to corner him against the cage and unload. That was BJ's error that ultimately cost him the fight and his career (hawaiians :rolleyes: ). Diaz kept tauting but Condit kept his cool, even when on his back against a BJJ monster like Diaz, implemented his gameplan and got a much deserved win. Condit vs GSP, here we go! (Also, had GSP fought Diaz, I think the fight would have gone pretty much exactly like this).

Just read the news that he decided to retire. LULWAT? Ran from you the whole fight? Kalib Starnes called, he wants you to stop desecrating his legacy. Nick Diaz MMA Rules: LET'S BANG, BRO. Anything else is forbidden.

Either he's really pouting or he's trying to get himself out of his UFC contract so he can go for a boxing career. "Retiring" from MMA would pretty much do it.

I can already see it: ProElite: Penn vs Diaz, Out of Retirment.

I would have to agree with you bun bun, pretty much the same feeling on the entire event. Diaz is such a whiny little bitch, but i don't just blame him, i blame his corner. Did anyone else notice that before going into the 5th round, brother Nate said "you're up 3 to 1".. WTF? Are you serious? It's mind boggling that so many people picked diaz to win this fight and underestimated Condit soo much. Diaz is a pillow puncher, with most of his shots going to the body, which is just plain stupid if you have no power. Sure it might score you some points for the shots, but it's not affecting anyone. Also, someone with such a high level of BJJ that only wants to stand up and throw his pillow punches, SHOULD lose, it's your fault for coming in with such a stupid game plan. You're not boxing, you're in MMA. The diaz brothers are always making comments about wrestlers laying and praying, and taking people down for points etc.. well that's how the game is played morons, learn how to defend the takedowns. Condit was incredibly smart, i wouldn't call it running AT ALL, it was more of a machida type thing, throw some crazy punch + kick + kick combos and gtfo.

Now with that said, another mind boggling factor is how many other fighters/trainers though diaz won this fight.. not sure what they were watching, here are just a few comments.

"That decision was an absolute joke," Pat Militech

"I am done teaching guys to fight! Gonna teach them to run like bitch & hold guys down like a bitch it wins! How do u like that fight fans?" Duke roufus

"

Condit wins via decision. Great fight. I think I had it 3-2 Diaz but need to watch again." Ariel Helwani

"Wow, I would not want to judge that one. I had it even after 4. And diaz in the 5th" Dan Henderson

Chuck Liddell and Anderson Silva sitting ringside had Diazwinning. Champions know really who won" Cesar Gracie

I do NOT want to see a rematch, diaz doesn't deserve it in my opinion with his fight antics, end of round bull**** (holding the leg, TWICE), and his post fight crying. I'd be happy to not see him fight again, at least until he gets his mental issues under control.

Diaz is a whiner, but Condit had no intention of actually fighting him. He just wanted to get up on the score cards and run for the rest of the fight. I agree with the judges that Condit won, but that was a very wussy way of "winning" an MMA fight. So much for being "The Natural Born Killer".....

What you're saying makes no sense nerd rage, you're entitled to your opinion obviously but to say that condit ran from him for the entire fight is a little over the top. Diaz is CLEARLY the better boxer, we all know this, condit knows this, greg jackson knows this.. so why would your game plan be to stand and trade with him for 5 rounds? It's Diaz's fault for believing that everyone wants to stand up with him, when it's sooo far from the truth it's laughable. While you may think it's a "wussie" way of winning, it's incredibly smart either way. Look at the fightmetric stats, and you'll see that condit wasn't "running" as you put it. Condit had almost as many head shots as Diaz did, but with like 5 times more leg kicks. I fail to see how Condits leg kicks did any less damage than Diaz's body shots, in fact i guarantee they did more damage and that's why diaz was getting frustrated.

Like i said, it's your opinion but you shoudl really think about the facts before making those kind of statements, for example the james tony vs Couture fight.. did anyone REALLY expect randy to stand and box with him, of course not, it would be stupid. Do you think randy is a "wussy" for taking him down and subbing him? it was SMART not "wussy".

Diaz just looks permanently ****ed off. I was half expecting a Paul Daley style situation when the scores were heard. He was no different than my brother when we played Monopoly. As soon as I started winning (all within the rules), the board was sure to be thrown across the room with a "I'M NOT PLAYING ANYMORE, YOU'RE CHEATING".

Should Roy Nelson have jumped into the guard of Werdum? Why isn't anybody criticizing Nelson about that?

It's a fight. Diaz didn't make the necessary adjustments to close the distance like any good fighter should. Look at the Cruz vs Johnson fight. Cruz completely switched his gameplan when he saw that Mighty Mouse was getting the better of him on the striking exchanges. Diaz just kept plodding forward. His striking is vicious, his chin is granite but as we know wrestlers are his kriptonyte. Care to guess why? Because they refuse to stand and bang against a guy with that kind of skill.

And everyone who says Condit was running should be forced to watch Quarry vs Starnes or even Houston Alexander vs Kimbo Slice.

HOW DARED CONDIT REFUSE TO GET HIT? JUST BLEED MAN!!!

I would have to agree with you bun bun, pretty much the same feeling on the entire event. Diaz is such a whiny little bitch, but i don't just blame him, i blame his corner. Did anyone else notice that before going into the 5th round, brother Nate said "you're up 3 to 1".. WTF? Are you serious? It's mind boggling that so many people picked diaz to win this fight and underestimated Condit soo much. Diaz is a pillow puncher, with most of his shots going to the body, which is just plain stupid if you have no power. Sure it might score you some points for the shots, but it's not affecting anyone. Also, someone with such a high level of BJJ that only wants to stand up and throw his pillow punches, SHOULD lose, it's your fault for coming in with such a stupid game plan. You're not boxing, you're in MMA. The diaz brothers are always making comments about wrestlers laying and praying, and taking people down for points etc.. well that's how the game is played morons, learn how to defend the takedowns. Condit was incredibly smart, i wouldn't call it running AT ALL, it was more of a machida type thing, throw some crazy punch + kick + kick combos and gtfo.

Now with that said, another mind boggling factor is how many other fighters/trainers though diaz won this fight.. not sure what they were watching, here are just a few comments.

"That decision was an absolute joke," Pat Militech

"I am done teaching guys to fight! Gonna teach them to run like bitch & hold guys down like a bitch it wins! How do u like that fight fans?" Duke roufus

"

Condit wins via decision. Great fight. I think I had it 3-2 Diaz but need to watch again." Ariel Helwani

"Wow, I would not want to judge that one. I had it even after 4. And diaz in the 5th" Dan Henderson

Chuck Liddell and Anderson Silva sitting ringside had Diazwinning. Champions know really who won" Cesar Gracie

I do NOT want to see a rematch, diaz doesn't deserve it in my opinion with his fight antics, end of round bull**** (holding the leg, TWICE), and his post fight crying. I'd be happy to not see him fight again, at least until he gets his mental issues under control.

I find it ironic that most of the guys that said that probably agree that Martin Kampmann should have gotten the decision nod against Diego Sanchez (who was bleeding like a faucet compared to Kampmann's flawless face).

Diaz just looks permanently ****ed off. I was half expecting a Paul Daley style situation when the scores were heard.

Should Roy Nelson have jumped into the guard of Werdum? Why isn't anybody criticizing Nelson about that?

It's a fight. Diaz didn't make the necessary adjustments to close the distance like any good fighter should. Look at the Cruz vs Johnson fight. Cruz completely switched his gameplan when he saw that Mighty Mouse was getting the better of him on the striking exchanges. Diaz just kept plodding forward. His striking is vicious, his chin is granite but as we know wrestlers are his kriptonyte. Care to guess why? Because they refuse to stand and bang against a guy with that kind of skill.

And everyone who says Condit was running should be forced to watch Quarry vs Starnes or even Houston Alexander vs Kimbo Slice.

SO true dude. I can't understand why this is so hard for some people to grasp. MMA or at least the ufc was created in part to find out which martial art could top the next etc.. so in essence it's always been a sport of "anything can happen" because of the mass amount of disciplines that one person can have. Would people have expected Royce Gracie too outstrike someone in the early days? Of Course not, he's a BJJ genius, people knew this when they fought him, if they didn't train enough to be able deal with it, then the only person to blame is their selves. It's such an incredibly simple concept. Yet the people who can't wrestle, complain about wrestlers. The people who can't submit, complain about BJJ guys laying on their back pulling guard. This is a sport where you HAVE to be well rounded, because there is no excuses when you get taken down by a wrestler and can't do anything because you didn't cover enough wrestling in your training. What's shocking is that Diaz aside from ****ty takedowns and takedown defence has amazing BJJ and Striking.. yet he wants to just stand and strike not because he wants to make an amazing fight, he's said many times that he doesn't care if people cheer for him or enjoy his fights.. he does it because he believes in his mind that he's untouchable on his feet. While that may be the case against some, it certainly doesn't give you a golden ticket to make others stand up with you.

The examples bun bun mentioned are brilliant, nobody criticized Nelson for not wanting to go to the ground, it's the same ****, different fight.

Condit was the better and much smarter fighter last night, the diaz brothers just need to grow up.

What's really funny is that you can just imagine what the conversation was like backstage after the fight between the 2 brothers, just mad at the world, everyone else is to blame, the sport sucks, the fans suck, the judges suck.. everyone but the diaz brothers suck.

What you got against Hawaiians?

Nothing really but if you watched Max Holloway's videos leading up to his debut, every time it's WE HAWAIIANS LIKE TO SCRAP YO! Instead of, you know, fighting smart against a guy who's way out of your league skillwise. Same thing for BJ Penn trying to stand and bang against Diaz just for bragging rights and ending up getting smashed to bits.

Salaries are out.

Carlos Condit: ($110,000 including a $55,000 win bonus) def. Nick Diaz ($200,000)

Goddamn! Condit was set to make (officially) 55.000$ for a Main Event for the belt? Christ.

Also shocking is that Roy Nelson got 20.000$ against Werdum's 100K (no win bonus).

Nothing really but if you watched Max Holloway's videos leading up to his debut, every time it's WE HAWAIIANS LIKE TO SCRAP YO! Instead of, you know, fighting smart against a guy who's way out of your league skillwise. Same thing for BJ Penn trying to stand and bang against Diaz just for bragging rights and ending up getting smashed to bits.

Max was doing very well in the entry level circuit as a pro but got thrown into face Porier a tad bit premature don't you think? Build ups to a fight when you take pride in your heritage is no different than the Portuguese in Brazil. To roll your eyes at a race in your post seemed pretty racist.

http://bjpenn.com/mm...atch-13489.html

?Sources close to the deal just now confirmed with The Underground that Carlos Condit has accepted a rematch with Nick Diaz for the interim welterweight title.

Condit said ?Yes, I accept the rematch? and will be in Las Vegas on Thursday to finalize the deal with the UFC.?

According the The Underground, Carlos Condit has in fact accepted the rematch with Nick Diaz and it?s going down in Las Vegas, although no specific date was given just yet. Stay tuned to BJPenn.com for updates.

Condit and Diaz fought to a controversial five round decision this past weekend at UFC 143, that has left MMA fans divided on who they believe won the fight. Diaz fans claim that Condit did nothing but run the entire fight, while Condit supports point to sources like FightMetric to prove their case. Either way, it looks like the two are on a path to meet at least one more time, as Diaz will once again get the chance to fight his fight, and walk away the interim UFC welterweight champion.

UPDATE: Dana White, via his Twitter account, has confirmed that Condit has in fact accepted the rematch, and will be coming to Vegas on Friday to finalize it. In another tweet, he specifically said that ?Carlos wanted it?.

It's all pretty much a mess right now. Carlos said yes but Diaz still hasn't said anything (neither yes or no) about it. The only way this rematch would make sense was if it was for the real belt (GSP gives it up after a year, this isn't Strikeforce you know) and they go at it again.

Yeah i think this is a horrible idea.. i don't for a second believe the whole "carlos wanted it" scenerio. This sets a very bad example for everyone in the UFC that if you cry enough you'll get what you want. It's no secret that diaz vs gsp is a money maker.. but condit beat him, without a doubt in my mind and deserves the shot. **** Diaz and his whiny bull****, he does not deserve a rematch.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
    • Price Drop: Save 86% on Microsoft Office 2021 Professional Plus lifetime digital license by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save 86% on a lifetime license to Microsoft Office 2021 for Windows. This bundle is for families and small businesses who want classic Office apps and email. It includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, and OneNote. A one-time purchase installed on 1 Windows PC for use at home or work. Lifetime license for MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, & OneNote One-time purchase installed on 1 Windows PC for use at home or work Instant Delivery & Download – access your software license keys and download links instantly Free customer service – only the best support! Microsoft Office Professional 2021 (for Windows) includes: Microsoft Office Word Microsoft Office Excel Microsoft Office PowerPoint Microsoft Office Outlook Microsoft Office Teams Microsoft Office OneNote Microsoft Office Publisher Microsoft Office Access No faffing about with subscriptions, just classic apps that don't expire. Good to Know ONE-TIME PURCHASE INSTALLED ON 1 DEVICE Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop Full versions No subscriptions – no monthly/annual fees Version: 2021 Updates included* *Support for this version of Office ends on Oct 13, 2026 A lifetime subscription to Microsoft Office 2021 Professional normally costs $219.99, but this deal can be yours for just $29.97, that's a saving of $190. For full terms, specifications, and license info, click the link below. Get Microsoft Office Professional 2021 for just $29.97, or learn more Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • The only reason I want to know where you from is because if you are not from the U.K, then why should you care what we in the U.K do or don't do? Racist I am not, I am fed up with the amount coming over here and feel they can come over here and think we need to support them. Do you know how much it costs this country to support these people coming over here? Even when we give them a place to live it is not good enough. We had a barge that was being used to house immigrants, oh but that was not good enough. A mate said to me at the time, when he was homeless, he would have been happy to live on the barge, instead of ending up sleeping on a bench on the beach. I am not scared to say what my family heritage is, unlike you who is scared to say where they are from or where they live. Father side U.S, mother side Wales, still have family living in the U.S. A mate who sadly died a few years ago, had a load of people from different races recording in his studio, I got on with all of them. Skin colour don't bother me, where they are from don't bother me. Religion don't bother me as long as they don't push it onto me and it is not crazy stuff. I am not religious. But if you are not living in the U.K, then why should you care if we are in the E.U or not? This the problem, too many people poking their noses into where it don't belong. But you believe what you believe, if you think I am racist, then be it, I really do not care. Just grow a pair
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!