How many bad sectors are too many?


Bad sector poll  

54 members have voted

  1. 1. How many bad sectors are too many?

  2. 2. If spinrite has found and repaired 1 or more bad sectors would you continue to use the drive?

    • I would continue to use the drive
    • I would replace the drive as soon as possible.


Recommended Posts

1 and I'd make sure to get my a** over to a new drive asap.

I hate data rot with a passion and I think it's time all filesystems become aware of this issue.

I'd adore Apple to start talking to Oracle again about ZFS.

Yes, you can buy a 3rd party implementation, but:

I won't let some 3rd party touch my holy grail (my data) via them implementing a filesystem through hoops on my otherwise unsupportive OS.

When things get messy, you don't get broad support.

(recovery tools for your OS, etc... At least not the same range to pick from...)

I'm actually shocked we're still in the medieval ages of data integrity here...

Glassed Silver:mac

Bad sectors are unavoidable with hard drives. It's a physical problem with the technology. Further, it's not a problem that can't be "fixed" at least temporarily using a form of check disk, moving that data to another, good sector and marking the bad sector as such. It's nothing new and nothing that can really be avoided when dealing with hard drives.

A drive with bad sectors should be replaced as it is almost always a sign of impending doom.

  • Like 2

1....just 1...I mean I'd use the drive for some VM I didn't care for as soon as i ran some diagnostics and tried to replace the bad sector...but that's about all, as I wouldn't ever trust it. Ever.

This just happened on my work laptop - it suddenly got really slow, and SMART status reported a bad sector. I called help desk, and I had them replace it (had it expedited as they said it would take 3 business days, but that was unacceptable to me - so I had a replacement sent within an hour). Luckily I have most of my work backed up or on a network share or on sharepoint.

  • Like 1

As soon as there's a single read error that makes it a pending sector, I try to remove all data and then proceed to calculate its location and repartition it. Then I continue to use such drives for stuff that isn't important, especially now when prices are so freaking inflated. Only once bad sectors have continued to spread and soon the drive was done. For the rest I even have one with bad mechanics - it frequently recalibrates while turned on. I'm still using it as external, for various trash.

  • 3 weeks later...

I had a customer bring me her computer, because she couldn't open any applications. So like always unless it's a known malware infection, I first scan the hard drive for bad sectors with Spinrite. 46% into the scan it found 3 bad sectors. Then at around 90% of the scan it found another 300 bad sectors. So I called her and told her what I found.

I HIGHLY recommend she replace the drive. I told her I had one here I could put in. The drive had been repaired good enough at this point to be cloned. She said she wanted to take her chances with the drive. I explained to her that the drive is cloneable right now. If she takes her chances, the next time she brings it to me, I would have to

A) repair all the old or new bad sectors all over again

B) The drive might be so bad I can't clone it and would have to change her for a reinstall of windows on the new drive.

She still wanted to "Take her chance". So before I gave the computer back to her I cloned the drive on to a new drive I had in my office, just in case. Well today she called me (1 1/2 days later) and said the computer had worked good for about a day and now it's doing the same thing all over again.

I actually tell the customer that I would replace it but if you don't have any critical information on there, then just do a HAL, and use it till it fails Dave....

jf

But then if it fails you'll have to reinstall the OS which would be an extra cost to the customer. When you could just clone the drive now and it would just be part of the current labor.

Bad sectors are like cancer for hard drives. When you get one it's often a sign of a head crash, there is physical damage to the platter and possibly the head and there can be debris from the damage. Bad sectors will often spread to adjacent sectors and every time it does you lose more data. For me if a drive develops a bad sector that's it, it can no longer be trusted and I replace it asap.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!