Recommended Posts

Do you know *why* the desktop is unused (or as you yourself put it, underused) in Windows 7 compared to previous OSes? Simple - application publishers and developers (including Microsoft itself) got told - by their users - to stop cluttering up the desktop with application shortcuts "back in the era of NT/9x" (before Windows 2000). Office 2000 was the first product to get the hint, as, instead of creating two shortcuts (one for the Office Launch Bar, which premiered with Office 95, and a separate one for Outlook on the desktop) it created just the one for Outlook (banishing the Office Bar - a direct ancestor of the Superbar). In Office 2007 even the Outlook desktop shortcut was gone. Hence the end of desktop clutter. (Most applications (even games) have an installation option telling it NOT to create desktop shortcuts.)

It sounds (at least to me) like you are part of that group of users that, absent a Start menu, would much rather you have desktop shortcuts (or Taskbar pinnage). And, as you have discovered, Windows 8 (in either Developer Preview or Consumer Preview form) still permits both - as Windows 7 does.

My reasoning is that i like to stay on Desktop (personal preference) even on Windows 7 i pin everything i could think of on Taskbar and also i create shortcuts for games on Desktop to avoid clicking Start Orb. Same reasoning is for Windows 8. I want to avoid going back to Metro Start Screen from Desktop. Now i could care less about whole Metro look and feel (even thought i would change lot of things there). I'd rather see full integration of Desktop and Metro into one interface than having two. Also i have problem with HTML5 + JS used to write Metro Apps. Html 5 is not ready and JavaScripts are scary.

You know what, I am fairly convinced Desktop and Metro will be tightly integrated by RC time. As we know, fine UI elements have traditionally been the last to be built in Windows releases, and this is no different. For CP they could only do Alt-Tab, that is seamless integration of Metro and Desktop apps right there. I would expect this to extend through to RC. Another clue is that the task switcher is very much a work-in-progress. Alt-tab already does not discriminate between Metro and Desktop apps, and neither will the final task switcher. In fact, I feel the task switcher will ultimately be redesigned and combined into the taskbar. Then we might see a single UI where Metro and Desktop apps play hand in hand, the taskbar becomes the task switcher and the Start screen is pretty much the "new desktop". As you rightly point out the desktop is mostly unused and for those who like to populate can still continue to pin files, shortcuts and folders on the Start screen, though granted it is less flexible.

The whole concept of "desktop is just another app" is just a temp placeholder till they polish Metro out and will also vanish then. If you use Alt-tab a lot, it is already very seamless switching between desktop apps and Metro apps, and I refuse to believe Alt-tab is a singular place where this level of integration of found, hence the above speculation.

Another thing, continuing the above discussion, searching for apps is pretty much the same, but searching for files is wayyyy easier! I rarely use Explorer nowadays, it is really a big time saver.

As for Event Viewer, right-click on bottom left hot corner, the power menu opens up, click Event Viewer, presto! Pretty simple.

if that is MS direction perhaps they are rushing with Windows 8. I'd rather see that final vision they had than hybrid even if that means waiting another year or so. Windows 7 would just do fine in meantime.

if that is MS direction perhaps they are rushing with Windows 8. I'd rather see that final vision they had than hybrid even if that means waiting another year or so. Windows 7 would just do fine in meantime.

If they were to go for such a bold move, I am pretty sure there will be a "Classic Mode" or Win7 Mode option in there somewhere. Even with Luna/Aero which is only a minor enhancement in comparison, there was always the 9x mode with grey taskbars etc.

not to mention win+r hasn't disappeared

I've been telling folks that all those WinKey shortcuts that date back to the first such keyboards (namely the Microsoft Natural Keyboard and it's direct progeny) are still around - over a third date back to prior to Windows 9x. (The Microsoft Natural Keyboard goes back to Windows for Workgroups and NT 3.5.)

Pick yourself up *any* of the Dummies Press books that cover any version of Windows (especially those by Andy Rathbone) and you will find the WinKey shortcuts covered in excruciating detail. (I have Windows 2000 Professional for Dummies - which I bought for my own use when I migrated to that OS from 98SE at home - and I later recommended it when I went to work for Big Cable Company, where I got exposure to first Windows NT, then Windows 2000 Professional, as an enterprise client.)

So question.

If you are on a tablet, and on the Metro Start Screen... and want to start typing to search for an app, how do you do it. There is no on-screen keyboard button that I can see.

You need to use the Charms, swipe from the right then tap Search.

You need to use the Charms, swipe from the right then tap Search.

Ok got that, second question how do i make groups on the Start Menu? like the screen shot on post 1501 of this topic or as described here - http://www.howtogeek.com/108546/how-to-name-groups-of-apps-on-the-windows-8-metro-start-screen/

On a touch screen device only, (tablet) there is no icon at the bottom right of the screen to do this with.

Ok got that, second question how do i make groups on the Start Menu? like the screen shot on post 1501 of this topic or as described here - http://www.howtogeek...o-start-screen/

On a touch screen device only, (tablet) there is no icon at the bottom right of the screen to do this with.

Pinch the screen I think.

If they were to go for such a bold move, I am pretty sure there will be a "Classic Mode" or Win7 Mode option in there somewhere. Even with Luna/Aero which is only a minor enhancement in comparison, there was always the 9x mode with grey taskbars etc.

It has been said over and over, that the "classic" code is GONE from Windows 8's codebase.

Not to mention so far, that none of this has appeared in any post-beta screenshots.

My reasoning is that i like to stay on Desktop (personal preference) even on Windows 7 i pin everything i could think of on Taskbar and also i create shortcuts for games on Desktop to avoid clicking Start Orb. Same reasoning is for Windows 8. I want to avoid going back to Metro Start Screen from Desktop. Now i could care less about whole Metro look and feel (even thought i would change lot of things there). I'd rather see full integration of Desktop and Metro into one interface than having two. Also i have problem with HTML5 + JS used to write Metro Apps. Html 5 is not ready and JavaScripts are scary.

Windows 8's Consumer Preview didn't change that. The StartScreen replaced the Start menu - not the desktop. Unless I reboot, I don't see the StartScreen after going to the desktop the first time. Part of the problem is that if you integrate, the UI goes back to being desktop-centered rather than a universal (blended) UI - which *any* OS has to have to straddle multiple formfactors. (The issue with GNOME 3 and Unity is that they went more tablet/slate-centered than has even Windows 8 - and tablets and slates make up a smaller percentage of the non-Android Linux market than they do the Windows 7 (not 8) market.)

While I run the Consumer Preview as sole OS, I run pretty much entirely traditional applications. (The mere fact that I can do so on a beta version of Windows is unheard-of in my experience - even release candidates of Windows have issues in the backward-compatibility area - with applications, drivers, or both. The Consumer Preview, in my experience, has NO such issues.)

I've also pushed the Consumer Preview to the point where 7+SP1 would have thrown up. More applications at a time. More browser tabs - including multiple browser tabs in multiple browsers at once. If anything, I've been harder - much harder - on the Consumer Preview than I have been on Windows 7 since it went RTM - let alone since SP1 went RTW. Will it get harder yet? Pretty much a certainty, as i5-2500K is next up hardware-wise, along with at least a doubling of RAM (8 GB) if not a quadrupling (16 GB) - that also brings Hyper-V into the mix (along with extant VM solutions VirtualBox and VMware 8).

My reasoning is that i like to stay on Desktop (personal preference) even on Windows 7 i pin everything i could think of on Taskbar and also i create shortcuts for games on Desktop to avoid clicking Start Orb. Same reasoning is for Windows 8. I want to avoid going back to Metro Start Screen from Desktop. Now i could care less about whole Metro look and feel (even thought i would change lot of things there). I'd rather see full integration of Desktop and Metro into one interface than having two. Also i have problem with HTML5 + JS used to write Metro Apps. Html 5 is not ready and JavaScripts are scary.

so if you have shortcuts on desktop and it is your normal workflow, how to you get to desktop without a "jarring transition" from all open windows in Windows 7? You need to click the desktop button (or Win+D) and then click shortcut on desktop? and at this point you have lost all your open windows and need to restore them one-by-one?

Sounds like,

1. Windows 8 will actually improve your workflow

2. You have one hell of a messed up desktop :p

so if you have shortcuts on desktop and it is your normal workflow, how to you get to desktop without a "jarring transition" from all open windows in Windows 7? You need to click the desktop button (or Win+D) and then click shortcut on desktop? and at this point you have lost all your open windows and need to restore them one-by-one?

Sounds like,

1. Windows 8 will actually improve your workflow

2. You have one hell of a messed up desktop :p

I only keep game shortcuts on Desktop, but applications pinned to Taskbar. So if i am going to play games i run no applications. It is organized well and i like it. Sometimes i just search for something but it stays everything on Desktop so it is good.

I only keep game shortcuts on Desktop, but applications pinned to Taskbar. So if i am going to play games i run no applications. It is organized well and i like it. Sometimes i just search for something but it stays everything on Desktop so it is good.

^This.

I only keep game shortcuts on Desktop, but applications pinned to Taskbar. So if i am going to play games i run no applications. It is organized well and i like it. Sometimes i just search for something but it stays everything on Desktop so it is good.

so you are saying you don't use start menu most of the time? If yes, then how does Windows 8 affects your daily usage? I see that it will be pretty much same as Windows 7.

I got rid of W8 bc speed issues and stability issues,

but, one of my favorite tweaks for Windows 7 is to kill UAC (to be able to extract files into Program Files without idiocy),


Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System]
"EnableLUA"=dword:00000000

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\luafv]
"Start"=dword:00000004

Does this still work in W8? Can someone check?

I got rid of W8 bc speed issues and stability issues,

but, one of my favorite tweaks for Windows 7 is to kill UAC (to be able to extract files into Program Files without idiocy),

Does this still work in W8? Can someone check?

Yeah, that's work fine.

I only keep game shortcuts on Desktop, but applications pinned to Taskbar. So if i am going to play games i run no applications. It is organized well and i like it. Sometimes i just search for something but it stays everything on Desktop so it is good.

But how would this be different in Win 8?

You can still pin your applications to the taskbar and put your game shortcuts on the desktop

Has anyone been able to force enable Downscaling to allow Windows 8 to run on tablets and netbooks with a resolution of 1024 x 600 which is the standard resolution for many of the existing slates and netbooks, in particular the HP Slate 500. The hardware runs Windows 8 fine, but NO METRO APPS will run on a resolution lower than 1024 x 768. In Windows 7 with a registry setting you could enable downscaling to force 1024 x 768 but this has been removed from Windows 8.

Any info appreciated.

I got rid of W8 bc speed issues and stability issues,

but, one of my favorite tweaks for Windows 7 is to kill UAC (to be able to extract files into Program Files without idiocy),

Does this still work in W8? Can someone check?

I should point out that changing those registry settings will disable some Metro apps (possibly all?), so many will find that an unacceptable side-effect.

After getting Intel's driver on, you can force the higher resolution. Though distorted, works. MS really needs to scale Metro to 1024 x 600. Metro works much, much better on a tablet! There's is potential here. On a tablet, desktop is not really needed.

I should point out that changing those registry settings will disable some Metro apps (possibly all?), so many will find that an unacceptable side-effect.

Interesting. So UAC is now forced upon the user? What up with the world, UAC / DRM is the end of freedom!

In Windows 7 the fact that you can kill the UAC driver (not just fake-disable it from MSCONFIG, but actually disable the driver) without any side-effects is a god send.

What Metro apps stop working once you disable luafv from starting?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!