Why the New iPad 3 May Be Slower than iPad 2. Wait, What?


Recommended Posts

personally i think it will have the same performance and here is my reasoning.

if you look at the slides and the leaked microscope, you basically have 4 pixels on the iPad3 for every 1 on the 1/2. the A5X is a Quad core GPU with each GPU pushing the same number of pixels as previous iPads.

now thats a long shot, but i feel they Half-a**ed it just like they did with their " Multi-Tasking " ( i still dont belive it has multi tasking, its more akin to " Recently Used Programs "

No, you are thinking of it wrong, the current iPad2 is a dual core GPU so if you do 786,432/2 = 393,216 per core. The new iPad is 3,145,728/4 which is 786,432 pixels per core! So each core is doing double the work now compared to the first one. If the GPU had 8 cores then it would still be even.

No, you are thinking of it wrong, the current iPad2 is a dual core GPU so if you do 786,432/2 = 393,216 per core. The new iPad is 3,145,728/4 which is 786,432 pixels per core! So each core is doing double the work now compared to the first one. If the GPU had 8 cores then it would still be even.

ok, i thought the iPad2 was single core GPU, Duel Core CPU. makes sense

Why not wait those few extra days until the actual benchmarks come in?

We'll know on Friday. Apparently the GPU in the A5 was already overkill for a 1024x768 screen, so it might end up evening out.

I did read some discouraging reports about stuttering system animations etc. :/

Seems like an article for the sake of putting out an article. Why not wait those few extra days until the actual benchmarks come in?

because if the iPad turns out to be faster the writer just looks to be more of a hater. this way nobody can prove otherwise. im shure that if the performance of the iPad turns out to be like the article said, it will be trumpeted, and filled with " i told you so, if false it will be burried and ignored/forgotten

Also the CPU went from 1GHz to 1.5GHz. That too should help with the better resolution.

Where did you get that information? I did not read about the clock speed of the A5X anywhere.... That and the final amount of RAM on the new iPad.

Where did you get that information? I did not read about the clock speed of the A5X anywhere.... That and the final amount of RAM on the new iPad.

You know you are right. My friend was at the conference and asked that question and they told her it was 1.5GHz. I thought it was public knowledge by now. I guess we will have to wait till Friday for that clock speed to be revealed by iFixIt.com or a similar type of site.

All the resolution cheering stuff is pretty mute, especially for gaming. The iPad 3 will run games at a low resolution.

And you know that for a fact because? I remember Epic saying that the iPad was better than an X360 or PS3 for GPU/Memory ressource....

Not saying that games are going to use native resolution (some, simple one could), but why say "low resolution" ?

You know you are right. My friend was at the conference and asked that question and they told her it was 1.5GHz. I thought it was public knowledge by now. I guess we will have to wait till Friday for that clock speed to be revealed by iFixIt.com or a similar type of site.

was the memory actually increased ?

was the memory actually increased ?

That's what my friend told me (1GB). Again, I thought that info was released so we will have to wait until Friday when somebody tears it down.

That's what my friend told me (1GB). Again, I thought that info was released so we will have to wait until Friday when somebody tears it down.

well so far wild guestimates are all thats been released, you say your friend was there, ill go with it, ill take 3rd hand knowledge over somebody wildly guessing

And you know that for a fact because? I remember Epic saying that the iPad was better than an X360 or PS3 for GPU/Memory ressource....

Not saying that games are going to use native resolution (some, simple one could), but why say "low resolution" ?

"Low resolution" in comparison to the touted 2048x1536. If you have a PC and game, you know the score with that kind of resolution.

well so far wild guestimates are all thats been released, you say your friend was there, ill go with it, ill take 3rd hand knowledge over somebody wildly guessing

The thing is the iPhone 4S has an A5 processor but it is under-clocked to 800MHz. I wouldn't be surprised if the A5X processor is 1.5GHz but it will be under-clocked to 1.2GHz for the new iPad. Since this device has the same battery life, one would wonder if they will be under-clocked. She was fairly confident that the RAM is 1GB.

The thing is the iPhone 4S has an A5 processor but as under-clocked to 800MHz. I wouldn't be surprised if it was just bumped to 1.2GHz underclocked from 1.5GHz. Since this device has the same battery life, one would wonder if they will be under-clocked. She was fairly confident that it was 1GB RAM.

i can guess the underclocking was to preserve battery life

Let me make a wild guess but "upscaling" should be done "by magic" via iOS no? They said it only take Devs couple hours to make their apps Retina aware...

It's dead easy if you just have 4 pixels doing the job of 1, that's more supersampling than upscaling. Getting an app to scale properly at any resolution is going to be trickier. Some games on Windows are letterboxed because they only render at 1280*720 even if the native res is 1280*800

So same speed CPU/GPU, only 2 more GPU core to drive 4 time the amount of pixels. They should have at least increase the speed of the CPU/GPU to 1.2Ghz or something....

It's not going to be a problem for say, iPhoto, iBook or any 2D apps. But for games....

So yeah, bring on the upscaling, that's no desktop class gaming GPU pushing 2048x1536.

Good point about 360 and PS3 games getting upscaled to 720, but that was fairly experienced game devs doing that. Do you think the type of devs that iOS attracts will know how to do that?

Any dev who builds a complex enough 3D game to push the limits of the GPU should be able to handle that.

Less complex games by devs with less experience shouldn't have to worry about pushing the GPU anyway.

Yeah, this is exactly what I was saying. The A5X is barely anything new, hell, it's only a spec bump in the gpu, not even the CPU. All the more reason that the new iPad would be a pointless upgrade for a lot of people who already have an iPad.

Yeah, this is exactly what I was saying. The A5X is barely anything new, hell, it's only a spec bump in the gpu, not even the CPU. All the more reason that the new iPad would be a pointless upgrade for a lot of people who already have an iPad.

Actually I believe this processor is clocked quite a bit higher than the A5.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Honestly that feels even more useless than it did when Win11 was first released. In 2021, the uproar was somewhat justified, but only when comparing how good we've had it since Windows 7. Prior to that, a new Windows release would often require new, or very recent hardware. Windows XP wouldn't run (in any usable way) on hardware released when it's predecessor Win98 was released (let's ignore ME). It was time to shift the goal post, and the way Microsoft did that was actually ok. People have still had another FIVE YEARS of free software support with Windows 10, and those of us who want to have used these tools to bypass the limitations, all while understanding the impacts that may have. Most laptops don't last 5 years (sadly), so now the youngest unsupported hardware is 9 years old, and apparently has another year of support with Windows 10. That's good. Meanwhile, understanding the impacts and limitations, I have my 2013 laptop running Win11 perfectly fine. The thing that's failing on it is the hardware, the 2.5" SATA cable/chip is failing and corrupting the SSDs I put in. Thankfully it has a functional M.2 sata drive that works fine!
    • iPhone 18 Pro drop-test video and photos leak on the dark web following a data breach by Hamid Ganji iPhone 17 Pro - Image via Apple Apple is seemingly facing one of the biggest data breaches in its history, and just a few months before the official debut of the iPhone 18 Pro series, photos, a drop-test video, a supplier list, and key phone components have reportedly been leaked by hackers. Last week, we reported that Tata Electronics, an Apple supplier and iPhone producer in India, was hit by a data breach. As a result, it was reported that more than 200,000 trade secrets and confidential documents belonging to Apple and Tesla were stolen by the ransomware group World Leaks. According to Reuters, the group has now leaked supplier lists, component details, and photos of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models on the dark web. One of the materials leaked by the hackers is a drop-test video of the iPhone 18 Pro, which is due to launch this September. The phone is shown in a gray color and has the same familiar design we saw on last year's iPhone 17 Pro series. The device also appears to be quite durable, though it seems to be thicker than last year's model. One possible explanation is that Apple may be using a larger battery in the iPhone 18 Pro series. Moreover, Reuters says it has seen at least six documents mapping many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to their respective suppliers, including details on chips on the main circuit board and on battery and camera components. The documents reportedly detail hundreds of parts that will be used in the iPhone 18 Pro models. A person familiar with the matter told the outlet that Apple classifies this data as sensitive and “is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models.” Apple is reportedly investigating the issue but has yet to issue an official statement.
    • You do you, I've just said that it first appeared in "home" version before it will be available in "work" one. I use Edge only because it still supports MV2 uBO extension even on Android - I'll switch when they stop.
    • I imagine that was a review or something? My reviews mostly contain a lot of images and galleries, but these are all webp too, but yeah it all adds up on the page load. Would help if you were more helpful with your critique instead of bitching and moaning like a Karen 😂 Because then we might be able to fix it for you.
    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      142
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!