Microsoft slashes product key allowances for TechNet subscribers


Recommended Posts

Microsoft slashes product key allowances for TechNet subscribers

Summary: For the second time in two years, Microsoft has significantly cut the benefits it offers to TechNet subscribers. Will the newly reduced allotments of Windows and Office product keys really reduce piracy or just annoy Microsoft?s customers?

Microsoft?s TechNet program is one of the best bargains in personal computing. For an annual subscription price of $349, TechNet Professional subscribers get access to nearly every release of every operating system (desktop and server) and Office suite.

The licenses are valid for evaluation purposes only, but the downloadable products and product keys are typically Retail products, indistinguishable from shrink-wrapped products.

Two years ago, a TechNet Professional subscription entitled you to 10 product keys for every version of Windows and every version of Office. In September 2010, citing concerns over piracy, Microsoft cut those allotments to five keys.

Now, according to an announcement at the TechNet Subscriptions home page, the number of product keys has just been slashed again:

Beginning in mid-March 2012, subscribers to TechNet Subscriptions (excluding TechNet Standard which are entitled to 2 keys per product) may access a maximum allocation of three (3) product keys for Microsoft Office and Windows Client products in connection with their subscription. The allotted keys may only be used for software evaluation purposes. Once the maximum keys have been activated, no more keys will be made available. Additional product keys may be acquired through the purchase of an additional subscription.

In addition to that restriction, Microsoft has also imposed restrictions on the number of keys that can be claimed on any given day. As another support page notes, a TechNet Professional (Retail) subscriber can claim 44 keys in a 24-hour period.

Reaching your limit means that you have claimed the maximum number of keys allowed for your program benefit level within a 24 hour period. Every 24 hours you may claim another set of keys, up to your program levels maximum.

The same document includes an explanation of sorts for the sudden spate of changes:

Why has Microsoft limited my access to product keys?

We are acting to protect the value of your subscription. If we did not act to prevent abuse of subscriptions we would eventually have to either limit the products available in a subscription or raise the price of your subscription. We believe that this is the best compromise to continue to deliver the highest value to you while limiting abuse at the same time
.

Over the past few years, I have encountered countless examples of unauthorized resellers hawking Windows and Office product keys on legit-looking websites. It was a lucrative business for scammers, whose $349 got them 10 licenses for Windows 7 Home Premium and Windows 7 Professional and Windows 7 Ultimate. It was practically a license to print money, as long as their customers activated the resold product keys before Microsoft cut them off.

Even at five keys per product, the economics made it worth trying.

The question now is whether the newly reduced allotment of product keys will actually reduce piracy or simply annoy TechNet subscribers.

Source: ZDNet

not realy happy about this, but they have done this becasue of the abuse to the system, bizspark was abused like a dogs favriate stuffed duck.

but if you are using technet properly you dont realy need to activate 10 keys in a testing enviroment and once testing is done your supsed to remove the

software. but people dont those who say the do are likely to be telling lies about it.

This is bad... I claimed all 10 keys for all products before they slashed it to 5...

Its not a big issue with Windows Client and servers OS because you can activate it multiple times.

The problem is with Office where you can activate only a limited time with a key and after that they expire.

This is bad... I claimed all 10 keys for all products before they slashed it to 5...

Its not a big issue with Windows Client and servers OS because you can activate it multiple times.

The problem is with Office where you can activate only a limited time with a key and after that they expire.

really? how many times? I haven't ran into problems with office activations yet

really? how many times? I haven't ran into problems with office activations yet

10 activation per key... if you install and activate Office in a PC its activation no 1. If you uninstall, then install and activate again

its activation no 2 but that's not the case with Windows OS. You can format and install any no of times on a PC its activation no 1 but if you install on 2nd pc its activation no 2.

For office after 10 activation the key will expire and you have to go with the next key

Well I guess i'll be buying Windows 8 this year instead of a technet subscription. Just before my technet subscription ran out I logged on and copied 10 keys from every product.

For office after 10 activation the key will expire and you have to go with the next key

Online activations yes, but not phone activations. Have and usi a 2007 Technet Office for years, have done the activations over 10 times since original install, not a single problem.

And the activation counter resets after a while

Online activations yes, but not phone activations. Have and usi a 2007 Technet Office for years, have done the activations over 10 times since original install, not a single problem.

And the activation counter resets after a while

didnt know phone activation had no limitation but its a pain to do it...

didnt know phone activation had no limitation but its a pain to do it...

Agreed, it is a pain, and I dislike it. Luckly it has gotten better over the years.

What about hypervisors??? Someone may need more than 40 keys to test in one day. This includes 40vms + testing ms office+ sps or other stuff at the same time for a VDI setup right?

This is bad... I claimed all 10 keys for all products before they slashed it to 5...

I did the same thing, then just let my technet expire...one, because I couldn't afford it any more, and two, a test environment sometimes consists of more machines than they keys they're giving away.....and I personally don't appreciate being treated like a pirate, because with all of the NDA's I've agreed to on Microsoft's terms, I've never once leaked not one single bit of anything, whether it be beta or otherwise, to the public....I've not even talked about it to my family.

It's no secret that most people bought a subscription for a single year to get keys. This sounds quite reasonable to me and, unless you're willing to pony up considerably more for MSDN, you can't really complain as you're getting quite a lot of software for evaluation purposes at that price.

What about hypervisors??? Someone may need more than 40 keys to test in one day. This includes 40vms + testing ms office+ sps or other stuff at the same time for a VDI setup right?

I believe that activating Office and Windows under the same physical machine under a hypervisor will consume only 1 activation, and then following activations will reuse that activation rather than wasting a new activation slot. It may not be true if you change processor architectures on the hypervisor though (I?ve never bothered checking that, and even then it may depend on which hypervisor your using).

If not, well, you can sysprep without resetting activation so long as you set it that way in your configuration file and then clone. That?s how I do it, and I almost never activate a virtualized OSE more than once in a year period.

This is bad... I claimed all 10 keys for all products before they slashed it to 5...

Its not a big issue with Windows Client and servers OS because you can activate it multiple times.

The problem is with Office where you can activate only a limited time with a key and after that they expire.

Of course tech net was not meant for you to have cheap access to 10 licenses to install the OS on your one and family computers. It's for testing. For that I don't see any need for more than 3. For family computers and multiple home co putters you're supposed to use full regular licenses or famiy packs.

I believe that activating Office and Windows under the same physical machine under a hypervisor will consume only 1 activation, and then following activations will reuse that activation rather than wasting a new activation slot. It may not be true if you change processor architectures on the hypervisor though (I?ve never bothered checking that, and even then it may depend on which hypervisor your using).

I use vmware

I think 3 keys should be enough for most people, specially OS wise. I mean, mean personally I have 2 desktops and one netbook so there's 3 and the 2nd desktop I don't really use much so even if that stays how it is it wouldn't matter to me much.

That's because the only reason to have one is to have easy access to licenses do testing environments. Not to run as a daily use OS or production environment.

Note my hypervisor comments above. This is a concern.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!