Microsoft slashes product key allowances for TechNet subscribers


Recommended Posts

Microsoft slashes product key allowances for TechNet subscribers

Summary: For the second time in two years, Microsoft has significantly cut the benefits it offers to TechNet subscribers. Will the newly reduced allotments of Windows and Office product keys really reduce piracy or just annoy Microsoft?s customers?

Microsoft?s TechNet program is one of the best bargains in personal computing. For an annual subscription price of $349, TechNet Professional subscribers get access to nearly every release of every operating system (desktop and server) and Office suite.

The licenses are valid for evaluation purposes only, but the downloadable products and product keys are typically Retail products, indistinguishable from shrink-wrapped products.

Two years ago, a TechNet Professional subscription entitled you to 10 product keys for every version of Windows and every version of Office. In September 2010, citing concerns over piracy, Microsoft cut those allotments to five keys.

Now, according to an announcement at the TechNet Subscriptions home page, the number of product keys has just been slashed again:

Beginning in mid-March 2012, subscribers to TechNet Subscriptions (excluding TechNet Standard which are entitled to 2 keys per product) may access a maximum allocation of three (3) product keys for Microsoft Office and Windows Client products in connection with their subscription. The allotted keys may only be used for software evaluation purposes. Once the maximum keys have been activated, no more keys will be made available. Additional product keys may be acquired through the purchase of an additional subscription.

In addition to that restriction, Microsoft has also imposed restrictions on the number of keys that can be claimed on any given day. As another support page notes, a TechNet Professional (Retail) subscriber can claim 44 keys in a 24-hour period.

Reaching your limit means that you have claimed the maximum number of keys allowed for your program benefit level within a 24 hour period. Every 24 hours you may claim another set of keys, up to your program levels maximum.

The same document includes an explanation of sorts for the sudden spate of changes:

Why has Microsoft limited my access to product keys?

We are acting to protect the value of your subscription. If we did not act to prevent abuse of subscriptions we would eventually have to either limit the products available in a subscription or raise the price of your subscription. We believe that this is the best compromise to continue to deliver the highest value to you while limiting abuse at the same time
.

Over the past few years, I have encountered countless examples of unauthorized resellers hawking Windows and Office product keys on legit-looking websites. It was a lucrative business for scammers, whose $349 got them 10 licenses for Windows 7 Home Premium and Windows 7 Professional and Windows 7 Ultimate. It was practically a license to print money, as long as their customers activated the resold product keys before Microsoft cut them off.

Even at five keys per product, the economics made it worth trying.

The question now is whether the newly reduced allotment of product keys will actually reduce piracy or simply annoy TechNet subscribers.

Source: ZDNet

not realy happy about this, but they have done this becasue of the abuse to the system, bizspark was abused like a dogs favriate stuffed duck.

but if you are using technet properly you dont realy need to activate 10 keys in a testing enviroment and once testing is done your supsed to remove the

software. but people dont those who say the do are likely to be telling lies about it.

This is bad... I claimed all 10 keys for all products before they slashed it to 5...

Its not a big issue with Windows Client and servers OS because you can activate it multiple times.

The problem is with Office where you can activate only a limited time with a key and after that they expire.

This is bad... I claimed all 10 keys for all products before they slashed it to 5...

Its not a big issue with Windows Client and servers OS because you can activate it multiple times.

The problem is with Office where you can activate only a limited time with a key and after that they expire.

really? how many times? I haven't ran into problems with office activations yet

really? how many times? I haven't ran into problems with office activations yet

10 activation per key... if you install and activate Office in a PC its activation no 1. If you uninstall, then install and activate again

its activation no 2 but that's not the case with Windows OS. You can format and install any no of times on a PC its activation no 1 but if you install on 2nd pc its activation no 2.

For office after 10 activation the key will expire and you have to go with the next key

Well I guess i'll be buying Windows 8 this year instead of a technet subscription. Just before my technet subscription ran out I logged on and copied 10 keys from every product.

For office after 10 activation the key will expire and you have to go with the next key

Online activations yes, but not phone activations. Have and usi a 2007 Technet Office for years, have done the activations over 10 times since original install, not a single problem.

And the activation counter resets after a while

Online activations yes, but not phone activations. Have and usi a 2007 Technet Office for years, have done the activations over 10 times since original install, not a single problem.

And the activation counter resets after a while

didnt know phone activation had no limitation but its a pain to do it...

didnt know phone activation had no limitation but its a pain to do it...

Agreed, it is a pain, and I dislike it. Luckly it has gotten better over the years.

What about hypervisors??? Someone may need more than 40 keys to test in one day. This includes 40vms + testing ms office+ sps or other stuff at the same time for a VDI setup right?

This is bad... I claimed all 10 keys for all products before they slashed it to 5...

I did the same thing, then just let my technet expire...one, because I couldn't afford it any more, and two, a test environment sometimes consists of more machines than they keys they're giving away.....and I personally don't appreciate being treated like a pirate, because with all of the NDA's I've agreed to on Microsoft's terms, I've never once leaked not one single bit of anything, whether it be beta or otherwise, to the public....I've not even talked about it to my family.

It's no secret that most people bought a subscription for a single year to get keys. This sounds quite reasonable to me and, unless you're willing to pony up considerably more for MSDN, you can't really complain as you're getting quite a lot of software for evaluation purposes at that price.

What about hypervisors??? Someone may need more than 40 keys to test in one day. This includes 40vms + testing ms office+ sps or other stuff at the same time for a VDI setup right?

I believe that activating Office and Windows under the same physical machine under a hypervisor will consume only 1 activation, and then following activations will reuse that activation rather than wasting a new activation slot. It may not be true if you change processor architectures on the hypervisor though (I?ve never bothered checking that, and even then it may depend on which hypervisor your using).

If not, well, you can sysprep without resetting activation so long as you set it that way in your configuration file and then clone. That?s how I do it, and I almost never activate a virtualized OSE more than once in a year period.

This is bad... I claimed all 10 keys for all products before they slashed it to 5...

Its not a big issue with Windows Client and servers OS because you can activate it multiple times.

The problem is with Office where you can activate only a limited time with a key and after that they expire.

Of course tech net was not meant for you to have cheap access to 10 licenses to install the OS on your one and family computers. It's for testing. For that I don't see any need for more than 3. For family computers and multiple home co putters you're supposed to use full regular licenses or famiy packs.

I believe that activating Office and Windows under the same physical machine under a hypervisor will consume only 1 activation, and then following activations will reuse that activation rather than wasting a new activation slot. It may not be true if you change processor architectures on the hypervisor though (I?ve never bothered checking that, and even then it may depend on which hypervisor your using).

I use vmware

I think 3 keys should be enough for most people, specially OS wise. I mean, mean personally I have 2 desktops and one netbook so there's 3 and the 2nd desktop I don't really use much so even if that stays how it is it wouldn't matter to me much.

That's because the only reason to have one is to have easy access to licenses do testing environments. Not to run as a daily use OS or production environment.

Note my hypervisor comments above. This is a concern.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!