Recommended Posts

I read a lot of complaining about the missing start button. Finally I got to install Windows 8 and I dont really miss it.

Just create shortcuts on the Metro Dashboard for apps you often use or simply type in the app name and the search brings it up instantly.

whats the big problem?

  • Like 3

I thought the Start button was essential until I started to use different operating systems. It's not really needed - people are just too used to the menu on the bottom left that's been there for years.

  • Like 2

the metro dashbaord can be very very very clutter if you have more then 50 or more programs installed. there is no way to organized them

? i don't understand

on the main metro start screen you can group tiles into groups that you can name whatever you want

on the All Programs section of the screen apps are sorted the exact same way they were in the old all programs menu

so i don't see the problem

edit: also, I don't know many casual users that will have that many apps installed

heck, I don't even have that many apps installed atm

the metro dashbaord can be very very very clutter if you have more then 50 or more programs installed. there is no way to organized them

You can group like programs together, name them, and arrange the tiles as you see fit. Newly installed programs get added to the end. I've found it useful to add a "recently installed" group at the end so I can unpin them later or add them to an existing group.

However, as the number of programs increases the most efficient way to launch is to search. If you prefer an "all apps" list like the windows 7 "all programs" list, just click on the search charm and it pops up. Like programs (such as MS Office) are automatically grouped.

If you prefer an "all apps" list like the windows 7 "all programs" list, just click on the search charm and it pops up. Like programs (such as MS Office) are automatically grouped.

you don't even have to do that. just right click on the start screen (or swipe up if you're on a tablet) to bring up the bottom menu and there is an "all programs" button

i rarely actually browse the Start Menu; however, i use it all the time for searching for a program. Start button the keyboard, type, enter, done.

im sure this can be done in the Metro UI, though, right?

you are correct, that works exactly the same

I don't want icons or titles on desktop like I have nothing on Windows 7.

Taskbar at bottom is for multitasking so I can switch apps. Start button is for my menu to access to the programs.

I have live weather information on my desktop instead of pulling an app or browser to check the weather.

Metro isn't working well for advanced users such as design or video work.

Looks like I might switch to iMac in near future. Metro is great on tablets or touch-based devices such as monitors, All-In-One PC, etc.

I don't want icons or titles on desktop like I have nothing on Windows 7.

Taskbar at bottom is for multitasking so I can switch apps. Start button is for my menu to access to the programs.

I have live weather information on my desktop instead of pulling an app or browser to check the weather.

Metro isn't working well for advanced users such as design or video work.

Looks like I might switch to iMac in near future. Metro is great on tablets or touch-based devices such as monitors, All-In-One PC, etc.

The desktop is still there if you need it. If you wish to stick to using the desktop UI then metro is just a fancy app launcher.

i rarely actually browse the Start Menu; however, i use it all the time for searching for a program. Start button the keyboard, type, enter, done.

im sure this can be done in the Metro UI, though, right?

In Metro UI you just start typing. No need for the start button on keyboard. Just start typing.

Some people are under the false impression that Metro doesn't work with keyboard and mouse input, and think Microsoft is forcing them into buying new hardware.

  • Like 3

The desktop is still there if you need it. If you wish to stick to using the desktop UI then metro is just a fancy app launcher.

I know that, but metro based app will take you back to Metro screen.. When it's done, I have to click to go back to desktop... broken workflow.

  • Like 2

The start button makes working on someone ELSES computer much easier. Sure, if its your computer, you can put whatever icons you want wherever you want. If you're a tech, this whole thing is just ****ing us off. Don't worry, we'll get over it, and mark all of our rates up, no big.

I know that, but metro based app will take you back to Metro screen.. When it's done, I have to click to go back to desktop... broken workflow.

Then if you're deciding to stick with desktop apps, why are you switching back and forth? If you don't like metro then don't use metro apps. Heck you can uninstall all of them.

Then if you're deciding to stick with desktop apps, why are you switching back and forth? If you don't like metro then don't use metro apps. Heck you can uninstall all of them.

I know but it won't be around very long because the developers are creating apps for Metro which means developers may stop developing the apps for desktops in near future. I know they can not create 2 modes (desktop and metro) of each app. Too much time on it. Unless they can create 2 modes in 1 app such as universal app like iOS has.

I wish they develop an app with first time installation to ask the user which mode you want to use, for example: "Which mode you want this installer to install an app in? Desktop or Metro" If an user choose Metro, then an app will be installed in Metro otherwise app will be installed in desktop if desktop is chosen.

If desktop is chosen, the installer will download desktop app then install it or take the user to the website to download an app via their desktop version of browser.

Plus, if installer detect a device such as tablet, the installer will disable the desktop option or won't show desktop option such as invisible.

Looks like desktop computers may not be around in near future if Metro is popular and huge in marketshare in some day which I hope not. I like to have desktop computers for very long time for gaming, heavy mulitasking, heavy editing such as photoshop, etc.

Some of metro apps are not supported with mouse wheel which you will have to drag the bottom scrollbar to scroll left or right. Lame. Mouse wheel = winner.

I know but it won't be around very long because the developers are creating apps for Metro which means developers may stop developing the apps for desktops in near future.

They pretty much already have. Desktop development on Windows was destroyed years ago. Very few programs take advantage of Windows 7 technologies.

Honestly I don't need it. But I would like some consistent behavior between the desktop and Metro. As it is for a lot of things that I do I've found that I'd have to be on the desktop working and then switch over to Metro and then switch back to the desktop. Should be able to do all common tasks in both interfaces. I'm glad that they kept the desktop around instead of just going with pure Metro because Metro is quite frankly a disaster for professionals (Quite good for casual users though!) - But it's just weird how there are so many inconsistencies between the two and how some fluidity was lost due to having to switch between the desktop and metro. Quite honestly if I didn't HAVE TO switch into Metro to do some things, I would never even use it.

Looks like desktop computers may not be around in near future if Metro is popular and huge in marketshare

Don't worry, people have been saying that the desktop computer is doomed for well over 20 years now. The truth of the matter is that regardless of what some people think, things like Metro have a LONG LONG *LOOOOOOONG* way to go before they even pose a somewhat significant threat to the Desktop/Laptop markets.

They pretty much already have.

No?

I installed Windows 8 CP on my mothers laptop, told her once where to move the mouse to open the start menu, and there's been no problem ever since. It's not entirely necessary, but the visual clue might be nice for some.

I read a lot of complaining about the missing start button. Finally I got to install Windows 8 and I dont really miss it.

Just create shortcuts on the Metro Dashboard for apps you often use or simply type in the app name and the search brings it up instantly.

whats the big problem?

I don't need start button as much as i need Start Menu since Metro Screen provides nothing for me. Since i will uninstall everything on Metro Screen and i don't plan to pin anything there. Microsoft doesn't provide solution for such scenario and leaves lot of people hanging there.

I don't need start button as much as i need Start Menu since Metro Screen provides nothing for me. Since i will uninstall everything on Metro Screen and i don't plan to pin anything there. Microsoft doesn't provide solution for such scenario and leaves lot of people hanging there.

Geeks. Heh.

I don't need start button as much as i need Start Menu since Metro Screen provides nothing for me. Since i will uninstall everything on Metro Screen and i don't plan to pin anything there. Microsoft doesn't provide solution for such scenario and leaves lot of people hanging there.

Or you could pin your commonly used desktop apps for quick access. Why click on the desktop tile only to click on something pinned on the superbar or placed on the desktop? Just group and pin the programs to the start screen. A group for office, a group for task specific programs, a group for commonly accessed directories, etc. It's almost like you're trying to make it as difficult as possible to use.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!