Whats Faster - Sata 6 vs USB 3.0


Recommended Posts

I recently purchased 2x2 TB WD Caviar Green seeing as how best buy was having a sale and amazon also reduced the price, which will most likely go back and forth but I bought them because they are only 119 each. Anyway I plan to use these drives for storage only, now I currently have the same types of drives in a HDD Dock that is USB 3.0, and my motherboard natively supports Sata 6 on all the 5 ports available. My question is what would I be better off doing, putting the 2 drives I have in my dock now inside my computer, putting the new drives I'm getting in the dock, or installing them in my computer?. What is faster in terms of interface is what I'm trying to say...Sata 6 or USB 3.0.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1069040-whats-faster-sata-6-vs-usb-30/
Share on other sites

Either way you will get the same results. crap speeds

The connection isnt your bottleneck - its those hard drives.

But to answer your question, the SATA 6Gb connection is currently showing better speeds. I think it has to do with USB3.0 driver maturity.

Both have the ability to get really fast, but right now SATAIII has the edge.

One drive supports USB 3 and the other SATA3. Both of these interfaces support a maximum throughput, but that doesn't mean these drives ever meet that speed.

The only type of hard drives that in fact come even close are SSD's, they work in an entirely different way. I have a couple of fairly fast platter based hard drives and the fastest I've seen out of them via SATA3 is 120MB/s (for large read/writes from a 2nd drive of the same type) which is nothing close to the actual throughput for sata 3, it's actually 0.9375 gigabits.

These drives are connected to SATA 3 but they only have SATA 2 controllers and they don't even hit the max speed for sata 2. My SSD smokes them, it's super fast but even that only has a SATA 2 controller!

So there you have it, don't worry about the interface type at all, look for actual benchmarks for these drives to see how they stack against each other.

What does that mean when you say USB always adds unnecessary overhead (especially when copying huge files)

USB is a host controlled protocol. Very little is typically offloaded at the chipset level. With SATA the chipset controls most of it and the CPU deals with the data as little as possible.

You probably won't usually notice unless you're doing a lot of things at once, with todays CPUs.

youll not see any performance above SATA2 speeds in all honesty with either solution. Physical hard disks are limited by rotational speeds of the platters/mechanical limits. The only way to see perf speeds near SATAIII or USB3 is with SSDs.

the only difference on those drives to previous generations is the interface, nothing has changed internally (or minor things like larger cache) pointless tbvh.

What's wrong with the hard drives? the interface on it supports sata 3 and 6 so I don't understand.

Green hard drives spin at 5400 RPM. So, it doesn't matter whether you have SATA6 connection or USB3, the drive itself is not going to be as fast. There's nothing 'wrong' with the drives per se, but they are slower, and designed primarily for storage, not for speed.

SATA-based interfaces also support OS-level Native Command Queueing (NCQ), which decides which orders read/write operations to minimize seeking, in theory making it faster.

if the HDD supports it, when connected via USB Win7 will enable NCQ etc on the USB drives also. As long as it detects the drive properly. But your right less overheads using SATA, but in real world it will make next to no difference as the drives themselves wont get past max USB2/SATA2 upper limits anyways, due to mechanical lmitations on the drives.

I do not like how I have to reboot the computer when I connect a SATA drive. USB3 might be slower but much more convenient.

If your computer has a SATA dock, you should be able to unplug it whenever you would a USB drive because it should support hot swapping... (I'd check that in your motherboard manual though)

SATAIII has 6GBs and USB 3.0 has 5GBs.

sorry, but this misinfo needs to stop. i see it all too often. SATA3 offers 6Gb/s, not 6GB/s. there's a HUGE difference. likewise, USB3 offers a theoretical 5Gb/s, not 5GB/s.

so, OP, USB3 offers a maximum of 625MB/s throughput, but in practice, you'll be lucky to see 350MB/s. That WD Green hard drive is only going to transfer at a maximum of like 80MB/s w/ a large sequential transfer. Write speeds are likely to be even slower.

  • Like 2

What's wrong with the hard drives? the interface on it supports sata 3 and 6 so I don't understand.

In a way you can think of it like this - You can buy a new sports car that can reach 240MPH but you are limited to 60MPH because of laws and all that. :D In this case, the road is 6000MPH (Mbps) but the car only maxes out at 150MPH (150MB/s). You can floor it and put in the best gas and tons of stickers (:p) but that wont make it go any faster because it's already at the MAX.

HDDs can only spin so far and push so much data - SSDs on the other hand can reach the magical 550MB/s however.

Internal mounted drives are generally better than external because there is less control throughput. An external dock will have it's own controller which may or may not instruct the drive to "power down" when not in use, among other things, and you won't have much of a choice to override that. If internally mounted, you'll be connected directly to the SATA controller on the motherboard and will have more power control.

Beyond all of this, as others have already said, most of this means nothing since this is a mechanical hard drive we are talking about. And on top of that, it's a Caviar Green, which in my opinion is a terrible terrible drive. They are slow and unreliable, so my advise is to not keep anything on there that will ruin your life if/when the drive dies.

The drive still uses an underlying SATA interface regardless of the capabilities of USB3. SATA could be 6Gbps and USB3.0 at 6000Gbps but it is still going to run at 6Gbps because that is what is is really using. USB3.0 is just an extra layer if you don't need it for portability/easy connectivity.

Nothing, you're simply faced with the reality that rotational hard drives are limited by their inherently slow design.

Think of it an an autobahn. The speed limit is 350 but your Toyota can only do 200.

there's no speed limit on the autobahn, only sections where there is a recommended speed. you can go as fast as you want in most parts without incident.

I do not like how I have to reboot the computer when I connect a SATA drive. USB3 might be slower but much more convenient.

You don't. If you have a hotswap chassis, or cables that support hotswap, you can hot-plug a drive. The difference is that in a hot plug cable, the ground pins stick out further than the 5v and 12v pins, so the ground lines make connection first. Once the drive is grounded, it can have power applied and not have an issue. All my sata 2 drives in my file server can be hot plugged at-will.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!