cpu cores


Recommended Posts

Depends on the processors, and what you are using it for.

1 processor with 2 cores would be like Desktop and a 2 processor box would be more like a Server (However, i think there is a sandybridge-e motherboard that supports 2 cpus....)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071171-cpu-cores/#findComment-594808319
Share on other sites

A dual socket system with two hexa-cores ;-)

(I only have double quad core, hoping to see a refresh in the future so I can jump up to 16 cores)

Seriously though, unless you have very specific needs (that make you money, or you have so much that you don't have to care) a single socket multi-core cpu will serve all your needs.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071171-cpu-cores/#findComment-594808323
Share on other sites

The amount of cores per chip depends on what the technology allows. At the moment, hex cores are around.

Which is a good ?

2 processor box.

Or.

1 processor with 2 cpu cores box

2 processors on one chip is better than two chips with a processor each. Why? Because you can have a dual socket motherboard, and put 2x dual core processors, which means you'd have 4 processors in total. Rather than two (one per chip).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071171-cpu-cores/#findComment-594808333
Share on other sites

I have a 6 core right now and I have to tell you: It's fat as ****! Really there is no other way to describe it! If you REALLY need a hecta core you:

A. Are someone I can Google and the only thing that comes up is a **** load dollar signs

B. Are a multitasking crack head that just got done eating another crack head

C. Are a serious Developer/Photographer/Gamer/business man that want to multitask like a crack head

D. Don't know what "overkill" is because you are a crack head

Hecta ($$$2000.00$$$) :|

http://www.amazon.co...data/B007KAGKHU

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071171-cpu-cores/#findComment-594808359
Share on other sites

I have a 6 core right now and I have to tell you: It's fat as ****! Really there is no other way to describe it! If you REALLY need a hecta core you:

A. Are someone I can Google and the only thing that comes up is a **** load dollar signs

B. Are a multitasking crack head that just got done eating another crack head

C. Are a serious Developer/Photographer/Gamer/business man that want to multitask like a crack head

D. Don't know what "overkill" is because you are a crack head

Hecta ($$$2000.00$$$) :|

http://www.amazon.co...data/B007KAGKHU

Isnt the s2011 3960x @ $999 an octo-core ? (and the fastest chip on the market)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071171-cpu-cores/#findComment-594808369
Share on other sites

The amount of cores per chip depends on what the technology allows. At the moment, hex cores are around.

2 processors on one chip is better than two chips with a processor each. Why? Because you can have a dual socket motherboard, and put 2x dual core processors, which means you'd have 4 processors in total. Rather than two (one per chip).

Multi-processor is better than multi-core...

Which is a good ?

2 processor box.

Or.

1 processor with 2 cpu cores box

As said above, Multi-Processor is best. In a multi-core setup you're sharing processor resources between multiple cores (so a quad core CPU with 4MB of L2 CACHE will have 1MB of cache per core, for instance) whereas dual processor will have 100% of the processor resources dedicated to it.

For that reason a dual processor, dual core CPU setup would be preferred over a single quad core CPU for CPU intensive tasks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1071171-cpu-cores/#findComment-594808371
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!