Recommended Posts

More than 550 health professionals and organizations have signed a letter to McDonald's Corp. asking the maker of Happy Meals to stop marketing junk food to kids and retire Ronald McDonald.

The letter, slated to run in the form of full-page ads in six metropolitan newspapers around the country on Wednesday, acknowledges that "the contributors to today's (health) epidemic are manifold and a broad societal response is required. But marketing can no longer be ignored as a significant part of this massive problem."

"We are committed to responsible advertising and take our communications to children very seriously," McDonald's said in a statement. "We understand the importance of children's health and nutrition, and are committed to being part of the dialogue and solution. We serve high quality food, and our Happy Meals offer choice and variety in portions just for kids. Parents tell us they appreciate our Happy Meal choices."

The campaign is organized by the nonprofit watchdog group Corporate Accountability International.

The McDonald's letter, scheduled to run in ads in the Chicago Sun-Times, New York Metro, Boston Metro, San Francisco Examiner, Minneapolis City Pages and Baltimore City Paper, has been signed by such groups as the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and the Chicago Hispanic Health Coalition, as well as by well-known nutritionists and doctors like Andrew Weil, a doctor and director of the Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine.

The campaign also includes an effort to get McDonald's to produce a report assessing its "health footprint." A shareholder's resolution, submitted by the watchdog group and The Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, calls on McDonald's to tally the financial impact of fighting various measures like the San Francisco ordinance passed last year that established nutritional standards for kids' meals that come with toys. It will be voted on at McDonald's annual meeting on Thursday.

The letter from the health providers urges McDonald's to cease marketing food high in salt, fat, sugar and calories to kids, from the use of Ronald McDonald to Happy Meal toys.

more

Again the parents place the blame anywhere but themselves. It is the parents' responsibility to monitor what kids eat and how they behave. It worked prior to now, so what makes this generation of parents and kids any different. It is a real shame!

Again the parents place the blame anywhere but themselves. It is the parents' responsibility to monitor what kids eat and how they behave. It worked prior to now, so what makes this generation of parents and kids any different. It is a real shame!

Agreed. We can point fingers at everyone else except for those who are actually in charge of their children.

  • Like 1

i really have not seen him that much in their advertisements lately so it probably would not be that big of a deal for them to rebrand then again with all the people that are pushing for the company to stop marketing to children this might get passed you never know.

Agreed. We can point fingers at everyone else except for those who are actually in charge of their children.

Exactly! It is called lazy parenting! They need to take responsibility for what happens with their kids, but it is quite clear that "responsibility" is a dirty word these days! I was born in the early 80's and even from then all the way through the 90's, if myself or any other kid would have asked for candy or a meal at mcdonalds and our parents said no, the answer was "NO!". If we would have snuck and eaten it anyway, we would have at least been grounded.

Again the parents place the blame anywhere but themselves. It is the parents' responsibility to monitor what kids eat and how they behave. It worked prior to now, so what makes this generation of parents and kids any different. It is a real shame!

Correcto-mundo. Easier to complain and lobby than to police your own kids....

"We understand the importance of children's health and nutrition, and are committed to being part of the dialogue and solution. We serve high quality food, and our Happy Meals offer choice and variety in portions just for kids. Parents tell us they appreciate our Happy Meal choices.".

I LOVE McDonald's response. Such an elegant lie!

Exactly! It is called lazy parenting! They need to take responsibility for what happens with their kids, but it is quite clear that "responsibility" is a dirty word these days! I was born in the early 80's and even from then all the way through the 90's, if myself or any other kid would have asked for candy or a meal at mcdonalds and our parents said no, the answer was "NO!". If we would have snuck and eaten it anyway, we would have at least been grounded.

It's not about parents and responsibility. It's about marketing. Which is equivalent of 'hypnosis'.

It's not about parents and responsibility. It's about marketing. Which is equivalent of 'hypnosis'.

it's called have your own brain... make informed decisions not based on what the companies say, but research... something people in this world need to learn how to do anymore... parents seem to do it when their kids are babies, finding the best baby food for them, then all the sudden that goes away and their are brain washed into mcdonalds because of a clown? I don't think so.. they could think in the past they can think again and control their kids... yeah sure kids will whine about not going to get their happy meal, but if you don't introduce them to it to start with, it's not a larger issue... no one forces you to take your kid to mcdonlds when they are young, thats the parents decision

Screw them. The Ronald McDonald House Charities has done more for kids than these groups ever will.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_McDonald_House_Charities

Granted, they are specifically talking about Ronald McDonald being a selling point for McD's food, having that mascot has helped millions of kids around the world.

  • Like 1

Screw them. The Ronald McDonald House Charities has done more for kids than these groups ever will.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_McDonald_House_Charities

>

AMEN!! One of the best examples of being a good corporate ctizen IMO.

Kids can't even have a damn clown now? First they took away their Happy Meal toy, now they want to get rid of Ronald. Are they trying to kill the company or just turn it into another boring restaurant? Ronald has been the mascot forever, and now he's in jeopardy because stupid parents can't control what their kids eat and the dumb ass government -- whom I'd trust the LEAST with the safety of children -- think they need one more thing to regulate. It's getting way, way out-of-hand, folks.

haha! Really? 6 metro papers? I guess when education don't work...... and the uneducated take a stab at fixing the problem.

In Canada for example:

http://www.smoke-fre...da-warnings.htm

educating people STILL didn't make them want to stop smoking.. these pictures just drove people to buy separate containers, wraps, or something else for their tobacco. So they up the prices and made it mandatory that the warnings take up 75% of the package. But people STILL buy them! weird.

So, if putting those disgusting photos on cigarettes as well as every store requiring them to be out of sight so you have to ask for them didn't discourage people - how will axing Ronald McDonald and releasing Ronald McDonald 2 work?

Maybe a better plan is for McDonalds to start putting pictures of fat people who cant tie their shoes or something on happy meal boxes along with;

"did you know you would have to run for 4 hours and 32 minutes to burn the calories off from JUST your cheezeburger?"

I KNOW when I was a kid it wasn't Ronald McDonald who drove me to the place. the damn playland and brand new Nintendo systems and toys with my food was..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!