Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I am looking into getting a imac g4 from ebay. I was wondering what you guys think about it? I don't need the newest for greatest computer. I like messing with old hardware and getting it to where It can be used to a day-to-day basis. do you think its work up-dating to leopard? Shud I update the Ram and Hard Drive?

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks Matt,

P.S. Yes, this would be my first mac =D

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/
Share on other sites

I have an iMac G4 sitting on the desk next to me, it's about as useful as a paperweight.

At best you'll be 2 OS releases behind, and lots of internet facing software is either outdated or slow now (There's builds of Firefox, but they have no plugins, Safari is updated but is really slow, etc.)

Edit: Save up a bit more and get a C2D mac, it'll last you for a lot longer.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594836367
Share on other sites

Thanks your the imput but i am still looking into getting one. I just want one to have just to say i have a mac and to mess around with and learn how to upgrade and learn the guts of computers. And maybe some coding if i can get it to work.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840105
Share on other sites

Getting any PowerPC Mac is going to be pointless - just to say you have a mac. Really, it's not just a case of being a few generations behind, it's a wholly dropped architecture. The OS can't be updated to anything remotely useful, most apps no longer run, seriously - you seem hell bent on buying something you don't understand.

Coding? Coding what for what? Tell me what language you want to use, what you plan to deploy to, what environment you plan to code within? Sorry but whatever you say, you're likely to be hugely outdated.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840145
Share on other sites

Thanks your the imput but i am still looking into getting one. I just want one to have just to say i have a mac and to mess around with and learn how to upgrade and learn the guts of computers. And maybe some coding if i can get it to work.

From what I understand, there's really not much upgrading you can do other than possibly ram and harddrive.

You won't be able to upgrade OSX to 10.6 or any later version so any coding you do will be restricted by that.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840149
Share on other sites

I have thought about that. I was just wondering tho. Is there a way to Duel-Boot?

Like, boot two operating systems and have them fight to see which one loads? No.

Honestly, just get an old Dual Core or Core2Duo Pentium system, Mac or not, and run Linux on it. It's cheap, different, and you'll learn a lot, plus you can keep it current.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840161
Share on other sites

If you want to learn OS X a iMac might be OK. You can't go higher than 10.5 though (we're almost at 10.8 now). If you want to learn about the guts, forget it. iMacs are nothing more than laptops on a stand. RAM, wifi, hd, is about all you can upgrade on them. Guess it depends on how much you plan to pay for it. I never liked the lampshade iMac design, but it could make for a conversation piece alright.

As for G5's I'd run a mile from them. PowerPC's last desperate gasp for relevancy.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840243
Share on other sites

I would get it just for educational purposes, find out how to Mac works, especially OS X. Could be an interesting conversation piece.

Yes, That is what i am trying to say. I dont need the most up-to-date but i woulld like to find out how they work.

If you want to learn OS X a iMac might be OK. You can't go higher than 10.5 though (we're almost at 10.8 now). If you want to learn about the guts, forget it. iMacs are nothing more than laptops on a stand. RAM, wifi, hd, is about all you can upgrade on them. Guess it depends on how much you plan to pay for it. I never liked the lampshade iMac design, but it could make for a conversation piece alright.

As for G5's I'd run a mile from them. PowerPC's last desperate gasp for relevancy.

I dont need the most up-to-date. Lol i like the lampshade Imac desgin, I like how the screen and the neck bend and swivle. I forgot how hard the components of the lampshade's are to get at. I mite just go for a 800 Mhz PowerMac G4.

What do you think about them?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840285
Share on other sites

800Mhz will leave you at 10.4. 10.5 requires at least a 867 (it can be bypassed but you're still going to be running 10.5 on underpowered hardware).

I'd try to get at least a 1Ghz model (the last few G4 iMacs also came with USB 2.0). But again, it all depends on your needs and the cost. A cheaper, slower G4 with Tiger could do you just fine.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840331
Share on other sites

Sorry, I'm going to jump in here and say this is a TERRIBLE idea.

You will be buying something that is grossly outdated, will only be update-able with second hand parts and isn't supported as an architecture any more.

Buy a first generation Core2 based machine if you want something out of date to fiddle with. At least that way you can run an OS worth talking about :\

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840339
Share on other sites

800Mhz will leave you at 10.4. 10.5 requires at least a 867 (it can be bypassed but you're still going to be running 10.5 on underpowered hardware).

I'd try to get at least a 1Ghz model (the last few G4 iMacs also came with USB 2.0). But again, it all depends on your needs and the cost. A cheaper, slower G4 with Tiger could do you just fine.

I have about $100 to spend. (Its all in ebay cards =/) But i have been looking in to some on ebay.Hopefully i will have one by the start of next week.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594840343
Share on other sites

I just wanted to comment that I have a 1.5 GHz PowerBook G4 that runs Debian Squeeze quite nicely.

In fact, I'm also using the latest Firefox release (12.0) with the same bookmarks and addons as my AMD64 system. However, I couldn't find any up-to-date Firefox (Iceweasel) builds packaged for Squeeze (if you want to run the Debian Wheezy, the current testing release, you can get it) so I compile them myself from the debianized source.

Despite having up-to-date software, however, flash runs poorly (it pushes the processor to max which causes most stuff to not run). Also, VLC will not play HD (>480p) content. MPlayer will play 720p, but it requires hard frame dropping.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594841355
Share on other sites

I still have a Powerbook 1400c from 1996 that I use occasionally, mostly for word processing, reading ebooks or playing old games. It is pretty heavy by today's standards but it has a great keyboard. Old computers can still be useful for many things, even if just for the enjoyment of having one.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594841363
Share on other sites

I would get one if I know it was so cheap, $80. I would try getting OS 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 partition it up and load them. You can also get copies of some old OS X apps like Office X, Office 2004 and older versions of Photoshop like version 6 and CS and load them up. I actually liked the icons and the UI from that era.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074109-imac-g4/#findComment-594841369
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!