Recommended Posts

Are you jumping around with IPs like crazy?? Why in the world would the TTL for both the NS and A and cname be 60 seconds?

I was looking at dns queries -- and couldn't figure out why so many to neowin. Then I took a look at the ttl

******

;; ANSWER SECTION:

www.neowin.net. 60 IN CNAME neowin.net.

neowin.net. 60 IN A 74.204.71.245

neowin.net. 60 IN A 74.204.71.246

neowin.net. 60 IN A 74.204.71.247

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:

neowin.net. 60 IN NS ns3.neowin.net.

neowin.net. 60 IN NS ns1.neowin.net.

neowin.net. 60 IN NS ns2.neowin.net.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:

ns1.neowin.net. 60 IN A 74.204.71.249

ns2.neowin.net. 60 IN A 74.204.71.250

ns3.neowin.net. 60 IN A 208.43.57.26

********

Unless these IP are changing every couple of minutes -- why such a low TTL? Even freaking google does not have a 60 second ttl.

;; ANSWER SECTION:

www.google.com. 604800 IN CNAME www.l.google.com.

www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.225.146

www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.225.147

www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.225.144

www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.225.145

www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.225.148

See the length of that cname -- thats because they KNOW its not going to change.. Sure the A's that it points to do, so 5 minutes you have to recheck those. But neowin is 1 minute every single dns server on the planet that has users asking for neowin.net have to come and talk to one of the 3 ns every freaking minute. Not counting the extra traffic to re lookup the NS for neowin your causing.

That is just nuts!!!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074747-who-manages-dns-for-neowin/
Share on other sites

how often do change the 3 ips you have listed? 300 is still seems WAY to low for such a site.. Why would you want that added dns traffic?

Do you really move IPs that often?? You lower your ttl as you get close to a move - or if you expect an issue where you will be changing IPs on the fly, etc.

I see you bumped up the cname and ns to 6 hours..

But really 5 minutes on these ips

neowin.net. 205 IN A 74.204.71.247

neowin.net. 205 IN A 74.204.71.246

neowin.net. 205 IN A 74.204.71.245

You have been using the same IPs since what aug 2011 or something, this is what netcraft shows. Do you really need the extra dns traffic?

You could be talking some significant amount of bandwidth. I would assume with the number of users for neowin globally - that there is quite a bit of traffic.. Why not make that 5 minutes 1 hour, 12 hours? What are the odds that your IPs are going to change? Really..

Just talking a move to 1 hour vs 5 minutes would cut your dns to 1/12 of its current level??

If you plan a move to new servers or something in the future - then you just lower the ttl as you get close to the cut over. So that there is min amount of time before everyone sees the new ips. But I would think your generating significant traffic to your servers for no reason.

load balanced or just round robin dns? Which is NOT load balancing btw, load distribution sure.. Unless you are using some form of api to change the order of the IPs based returned by your name server upon load on the server at any given moment, than its not load balancing if your only doing it with dns. There are ways to do this -- but I'm pretty sure you just doing the generic round robin order of the 3 ips returned.

Either way your handing out the 3 ips.. Does not mater if you hand them out for 5 minutes or 1 hour or 12.. Your still handing out the 3.. The isp dns once cached will round robin through them.

This is to my server - 3 queries back to back..

C:\Windows\System32>dig www.neowin.net +short

neowin.net.

74.204.71.246

74.204.71.245

74.204.71.247

C:\Windows\System32>dig www.neowin.net +short

neowin.net.

74.204.71.245

74.204.71.247

74.204.71.246

C:\Windows\System32>dig www.neowin.net +short

neowin.net.

74.204.71.247

74.204.71.246

74.204.71.245

Notice how the order changes.. This is from my cached server. All within the current ttl.

Does not matter if that ttl is 5 minutes or 12 hours. Still going to change the order every time a client asks. They are just going to ask less often is all -- the order of the ips the given is going to be distributed to the clients in different order. So globally you still get load across all 3 of your servers.

Just look at one isp dns for example - say comcast.

C:\Windows\System32>dig @75.75.75.75 www.neowin.net +short

neowin.net.

74.204.71.246

74.204.71.247

74.204.71.245

C:\Windows\System32>dig @75.75.75.75 www.neowin.net +short

neowin.net.

74.204.71.247

74.204.71.245

74.204.71.246

C:\Windows\System32>dig @75.75.75.75 www.neowin.net +short

neowin.net.

74.204.71.247

74.204.71.245

74.204.71.246

Order is changed every time I queried it. Now there is nothing saying that client has to go to 1st ip given, but that is normally the case. So now first isp client will go to ip 1, 2nd client that queries would go to ip 2, etc.. So your still distributing the load across the number of clients. Just not having to come ask your server every 5 minutes if the ips changed.

Your distributing the requests across the IPs - this is load distribution. In this case does not matter if you have 5 minute ttl or 12 hour.. Other than load on your DNS!! That is for sure!

You don't need a low ttl to distribute your load across your 3 ips.. But that will for sure generate way more traffic to your dns. That is just not needed..

I have to assume neowin.net has to pay for bandwidth they use?? Right -- so why have more traffic to your servers than needed. You don't need a 300 second ttl to distribute the load across your 3 ips. A 12 hour would do the same thing.

Even if they had 500,000,000 DNS queries per month, it would be less than your average animated .gif on these forums.

Seriously though, the average query is what.. few hundred bytes tops - you might shave a little bandwidth here and there but I doubt it would make much of a difference in the hosting bill for Neowin.

And as for the comparison to "getting nowhere", people who tend to only view minuscule details lack the ability to look at the big picture - if we only dedicated ourselves to examining the most efficient way to do something, we would have spent so much time trying to perfect things we would have gotten nowhere either.

So 500 million queries * 100 bytes = 50GB of traffic.. What you don't think they pay for that? Why not make it 4GB with one simple change to 1 hour vs 5 minutes on their ttl?

And your talking more than 100bytes, with just the simple query for www.neowin.net returns

;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 207

So with your 500 million example your talking 103GBytes of traffic. This is nothing to sneeze at.. And I would bet they are seeing way more than 500 million queries a month to be honest..

So 500 million queries * 100 bytes = 50GB of traffic.. What you don't think they pay for that? Why not make it 4GB with one simple change to 1 hour vs 5 minutes on their ttl?

And your talking more than 100bytes, with just the simple query for www.neowin.net returns

;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 207

So with your 500 million example your talking 103GBytes of traffic. This is nothing to sneeze at.. And I would bet they are seeing way more than 500 million queries a month to be honest..

Good answer! (Y)

PING neowin.net (74.204.71.247): 56 data bytes

64 bytes from 74.204.71.247: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=121.680 ms

64 bytes from 74.204.71.247: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=123.945 ms

64 bytes from 74.204.71.247: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=133.143 ms

--- neowin.net ping statistics ---

3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 121.680/126.256/133.143/4.957 ms

Neowin seems to have connection issues. If I compare this result with say google:

PING google.com (173.194.34.166): 56 data bytes

64 bytes from 173.194.34.166: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=28.229 ms

64 bytes from 173.194.34.166: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.363 ms

--- google.com ping statistics ---

2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 28.229/32.796/37.363/4.567 ms

ping times and dns are not related -- if neowin is farther way from you than google, then yeah its going to be a longer ping to them.

Google has servers all over the planet - so I would hope the would be closer to you then neowin -- which only has the servers in 1 location.

I'll be honest, I've been having loads of connection issues with neowin and neogamr in the past few weeks.. loads of server not responding pages.. But I've just not really had time or motivation to report it. xP

I'm going to close this, as it seems to just be inviting unneeded attacks against an undeserving member.

BudMan is indeed correct with his point, and I thank him for bringing it to our attention. I have raised the TTL for most records as I said earlier. I realise the setting of the A records for neowin.net. at 300 may seem a little low, but trust me, it's like that intentionally, and for good reason.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ooooh! Two editorial from Paul Hill on the same day! Is it my birthday or something? 😉 Okay, let's see if I get it right. SearXNG develops a meta-search engine app. Individuals install it on their relays. Users connect to these relays to have their own identity-stripping meta-search engine instead of relying on DuckDuckGo. And some of these volunteers have listed their SearXNG instances on SearX.space. That was a lot of wrap my head around. I hope I haven't missed anything.
    • You sound like some Ukrainians in Crimea before 2014: "I didn't vote for USSR disbanding - I want Ukraine to be part of Russia again" 🤣
    • Uninstalr 3.1 by Razvan Serea Introducing Uninstalr: Easy to use and very accurate software uninstaller for Windows. It can uninstall multiple apps at the same time and we think it’s pretty cool. Developed with expertise by Macecraft Software - the minds behind jv16 PowerTools. Key Features Batch uninstall many apps at the same time. Supports unattended uninstallation of apps. Supports monitoring of new software installations. Also detects portable apps and previously uninstalled software leftovers. Shows all the data added to your system by installed software on a file by file basis. Shows all the data it will remove before starting the uninstallation. Filter and search the list of installed software. According to our benchmark, Uninstalr is the most accurate software uninstaller by leaving the least amount of leftovers when uninstalling apps. Supports detection and uninstallation of Microsoft Store, Steam, Big Fish Game System, Chocolatey, NuGet and Ninite installed software. Supports Windows Dark Mode. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8 and 7. Comes with these translations builtin: Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese. Has a single executable file portable version and a normal setup version. Uninstalr is freeware, lightweight and easy to use. No bells and whistles, no nonsense. Uninstalr’s custom uninstallation engine has a dedicated support for the detection and uninstallation of 15 types of apps: Normal Windows apps Microsoft Store apps Portable apps Chocolatey apps Ninite apps PortableApps.com apps Steam games EA App games Epic Games Store games Riot platform games GOG Galaxy games WarGaming.net games Battle.net games itch.io games Big Fish platform games Uninstalr 3.1 changelog: Key Changes Uninstalr now starts and shows the list of installed apps faster after the initial scan has been completed, and with much smaller memory usage. Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps. Improvements New feature: Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. New feature: Uninstalr now highlights possible leftovers and apps from Russia and China. This can be disabled from the Settings. New feature: A new filter that allows you to show only software that is installed to other than the system drive. New feature: Users can now select to always do the deepest and the most accurate scan for installed apps, at the cost of the analysis taking a longer time. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps, such as added dedicated support for MiTeC, EZ Tools and SysInternals tools. Improved support for portable apps installed via Windows System Control Center (WSCC). NirSoft portable apps are now listed with "NirSoft" prefix for easier identification. Improved the speed of uninstalling apps. The main installed software listing search will now find "Xbox GameBar" if you search for "Game bar" and vice versa. The tooltip now displays more detailed information of the installed apps, such as its registry key and uninstaller path. The links in the About section now look more like clickable links. The main menu is now more clearly indicated in the main user interface. Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office ships with some Windows 11 installations and is now considered a builtin Windows app and only listed if builtin Windows apps filter is enabled. Added a Help button to the main user interface that opens the help section of the website. Added an option not to close Uninstalr after uninstallation. If you open the Uninstalr website from the app, the website now receives the version number of your current Uninstalr version and warns you if you are using anything but the latest version. Improved the accuracy of the New Software Monitor. Improved confirmation messages for Steam and other platform related uninstalls. Improved the uninstallation performance of Steam games. Fixes: Known bug fixed: Some installed app names are capitalized incorrectly, such as "CCleaner Portable" is listed as "ccleaner portable". Known bug fixed: Some apps can be listed twice, for example, Smart Defrag can be listed once as Smart Defrag and then Smart Defrag Home. Known bug fixed: On the pre-uninstallation screen, the Scripts checkbox can be checked by default on Dark Mode but not on the normal mode. Known bug fixed: Perform Deep Analysis can be started only by clicking the button, not via the Right Click menu, main menu or F4 keyboard shortcut. Muse Hub could be incorrectly listed as Adobe Muse. SyncTrayzor was incorrectly detected as two unrelated software, SyncTrayzor and Syncthing. Smart Defrag was incorrectly listed twice as Smart Defrag 11 and Smart Defrag Home. It was possible to enter non-printable characters to the search input boxes of the main screen, and the path listing screen, which caused the UI to look funny. Changing the translation from Settings, especially many times in a row, caused the UI to distort. If you had multiple instances of portable apps on your system, such as the 64b and 32b versions of the same portable app, typically only one of them was detected, not both. In some very rare cases, Uninstalr UI could start with random characters in its search input boxes, which could make the UI look rather confusing. This was a rare issue, only reported by two users. The pre-uninstallation screen could display non-existing paths for example as the software's installation directory or main exe file. This was a cosmetic issue. New Software Monitor cannot detect the installation of Claude. Selecting all the found software made the UI look funny with the top panel covering everything else (because the names of all the selected software were listed there). Sometimes a Steam game could be listed a normal app instead of a Steam game. If the system restart after an uninstallation is delayed, e.g. because of Windows Updates being installed, this additional delay is incorrectly added to the time how long the uninstallation process took. This cosmetic bug could cause the program incorrectly report an uninstallation time longer than the actual uninstallation time. Uninstalling Minecraft could simply fail. The Only scan the system drive for installed apps setting does not fully work. If some apps are installed to a non system drive and this setting is enabled, the app could still be detected and listed on the main user interface. Changing any settings could also incorrectly alter the Only Scan The System Drive For Installed Apps setting. Microsoft OneDrive and Copilot are not always detected. If you enter something to the search filter field, then select the text and press the Delete key, this triggers the Uninstall button click even if your intent was to delete the text input. If you press the F5 key to refresh the screen during the uninstallation loading screen, the program will crash. If you enabled some setting, such as "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes", it could automatically be unchecked later. Uninstalr doesn't warn you if you try to remove Fortec antivirus. There should be a warning if user attempts to remove any antivirus or antimalware type program. Such programs should not be uninstalled using a third party uninstaller, as they are typically protected against automated uninstallation, for security reasons. With "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes" option checked from the Settings, Uninstalr could still display some installation size related elements in the UI which was confusing. The "Only scan the system drive" option moved under Improve Scan Speed from the General settings. If two software have the exact same name and version number, selecting both of them for uninstallation fails because only one is actually selected. Sorting the installed apps by size sometimes fails and the order is incorrect. The "Don't show which paths are currently analyzed" did not work correctly - some parts of the UI still show the currently analyzed path with this setting checked. The "Don't list software less than 10 MB" filter did not work correctly - some apps smaller than 10 MB could still be listed. Uninstalr could start very quickly and display an empty list of detected apps. Restarting the app usually fixed the issue and the list of installed apps was properly displayed. If you placed portable Uninstalr to a same folder with other portable apps, those were not detected because Uninstalr automatically added its installation folder to the ignore list. When trying to uninstall some specific software, Uninstalr could get stuck on the Searching for more data relating to the app phase. Uninstalr could sometimes do a silent uninstallation even if user had unchecked the Perform a silent uninstallation option. Known issues: Uninstalr can fail to run with an Out Of Memory error in systems that have a lot of installed apps. Using the New Software Monitor tool multiple times during one session can cause the program to get stuck on the Scanning stage. The "uninstallation completed" message box sometimes closes when the user moves the mouse cursor over the button before user clicks it. There is no feedback for the user after Fix Information feature has been used. The Right Click menu's Select by publisher option can display the number of apps per each publisher without correct vertical alignment. The default user interface might not display all of the found installed apps if you have over 600 installed apps. If you do, using the Screen Reader Compatible Interface solves the issue. Leftover apptype filter checkbox is shown in red font only in Dark Mode. Clicking the app's icon from the Windows Taskbar doesn't minimize/restore the app like other apps. The warning about an app that user wishes to uninstall being related to some other app user did not select can sometimes be inaccurate. If app's language is changed without restarting Uninstalr, the list of installed software might not automatically refresh. When software is being uninstalled, the UI can say it is processing paths unrelating to the uninstalled app. This is purely cosmetic and does not mean these paths are removed. Uninstalr might not properly detect and/or uninstall Steam games if they are installed to a drive different than Steam's default location in C:\. You might see "This action is only valid for products that are currently installed" error message from Windows Installer during uninstallation. This is a cosmetic issue. Download: Uninstalr 3.1 | 7.1 MB (Free, paid version available) Download: Uninstalr Setup 3.1 View: Uninstalr Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I always do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions relays before defining it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!