Have I missed something?


Recommended Posts

http://www.neogamr.net/news/minecraft-creator-slams-eas-indie-bundle

Seriously, what have I missed? Valve publishes the same games on Steam and it's a-okay but when EA publishes them on Origin (direct competition for Steam) then its "EA is the ********* company in the world" all over again?

Whats going on, can someone please explain me?

As I see it then the creators of those indie games need all the money they can get, even if it means letting EA publish their games on Origin.

:/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1074933-have-i-missed-something/
Share on other sites

as I see it most people don't want to have to install a complete other client that does the same thing as the one they already have just to play one or two games

it an unneeded redundancy thing in most peoples minds

and the fact that ea is REQUIRING it even if you buy a physical copy of the game (aka in principle it's no different than something installing crapware such as toolbars along with the installation of the program)

as I see it most people don't want to have to install a complete other client that does the same thing as the one they already have just to play one or two games

it an unneeded redundancy thing in most peoples minds

and the fact that ea is REQUIRING it even if you buy a physical copy of the game (aka in principle it's no different than something installing crapware such as toolbars along with the installation of the program)

So do most Steam games, whats the difference?

All in all, when we have competition in the client side I see it as a good thing not a bad one, maybe Notch is just mad because EA didn't publish Minecraft? :rofl:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't there games which require the installation of the Steam client even if you buy the physical copy?

Yes, having to have Origin as well as Steam installed does create redundancy. However, is it really worth making a huge fuss over like some folks here do? No. Either live with it or don't buy EA games at all.. simple as that.

The only problem having both installed is the HDD space, they are both startup programs in default and most just play with shortcut icons anyway.

And yes, at least the newer COD games require Steam to be installed or if you don't have it the game will install it anyway.

I wonder how many people who complain about having to install origin for games have multiple web browsers on their computer. Or media players. Or an email clients. Or instant messengers. The list of redundant software we keep on our computers is endless, yet we'll nitpick this one time because EA is involved.

For me, I buy games where they are cheaper. If that is through origin then fantastic. If it's through Steam, also great. I don't really see it as that much of a problem.

I also don't really get the issue with EA selling "indie" games. These games people... were made through the EA partnership program (only one I'm not sure of is Gatling Gears). If not for EA they probably wouldn't have been made at all.

Notch and all the rest of the people who are over reacting to this are idiots.

  • Like 2

I wonder how many people who complain about having to install origin for games have multiple web browsers on their computer. Or media players. Or an email clients. Or instant messengers. The list of redundant software we keep on our computers is endless, yet we'll nitpick this one time because EA is involved.

For me, I buy games where they are cheaper. If that is through origin then fantastic. If it's through Steam, also great. I don't really see it as that much of a problem.

I also don't really get the issue with EA selling "indie" games. These games people... were made through the EA partnership program (only one I'm not sure of is Gatling Gears). If not for EA they probably wouldn't have been made at all.

Notch and all the rest of the people who are over reacting to this are idiots.

Best explenation so far, thank you :)

Best explenation so far, thank you :)

I should clarify that they probably wouldn't have pc ports if not for EA. The developers of most of those games created them for consoles first and with the help of EA they were brought to the pc. Which is ironic because EAs help gave the developers the chance to put those games on Steam.

Whatever the case, it's just the same old nonsense we always hear whenever EA is involved. It's EA, so they are obviously up to no good.

as I see it most people don't want to have to install a complete other client that does the same thing as the one they already have just to play one or two games

In this case I doubt the games even require Origin to be running, unlike Steam. None of the games in my Origin account need the client running. It's just a storefront/download manager.

The short version is people just hate on EA because it's EA.

In this case I doubt the games even require Origin to be running, unlike Steam. None of the games in my Origin account need the client running. It's just a storefront/download manager.

The short version is people just hate on EA because it's EA.

Gatling Gears requires Origin to be running, but another game, Batman: Arkham City, I've also bought through Origin does not.

tragedy called it, i was against the idea of Origin last year, but got over it. i don't mean complaining about it isn't valid, it's fine to have that opinion, i just think it's a waste of time personally to worry about this. I only have BF3 and Syndicate on Origin, nothing will dethrone Steam from dominating my PC gaming, so what's the problem? and even if it did, it's still gaming, something i do to relax when i can. no need to get all wound up by it.

Aside from the redundancy in needing ANOTHER digital store app(which only came about due to ea throwing a pathetic little fit), another reason why people may not like origin is cause it's quite noticeably inferior to steam in what it does.

Aside from the redundancy in needing ANOTHER digital store app(which only came about due to ea throwing a pathetic little fit), another reason why people may not like origin is cause it's quite noticeably inferior to steam in what it does.

You could just as easily call it Valve throwing a pathetic little fit, considering they were happy to sell Dragon Age 2 and Crysis 2 to people before they changed their terms.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      255
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!