Recommended Posts

Hey

Let me see how I explain this:

Network 1:

WAN add: 88.34.12.3

Router add: 192.168.100.100

Netmask: 255.255.255.0

Clients (for examples): 192.168.100.2, 192.168.100.3, etc

Network 2:

WAN add: 94.55.98.3

Router add: 192.168.1.1

Netmask: 255.255.255.0

Clients (for examples): 192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.4, etc

Now how can I "join" both networks so when Im at a PC with 192.168.100.2 I can ping (and access) 192.168.1.4?

VLANs? Routes? Subnetting?

Thanks!

If these two networks can be physically connected and the equipment is capable of routes, that is the way to go.

If the network are separated by public internet space, a VPN router at end will be your only option.

VPN would work in either case though. It just seems a little silly to VPN in scenario 1.

If these two networks can be physically connected and the equipment is capable of routes, that is the way to go.

If the network are separated by public internet space, a VPN router at end will be your only option.

VPN would work in either case though. It just seems a little silly to VPN in scenario 1.

I think I have have explained myself incorrectly.

There is only ONE scenario. 2 networks seperated by a public space (internet would be the case) but I want to them to be seeable and access each other freely.

Besides VPN (which I knew of :) ) is there any other choice (irrelevent if it is better ot worst; I just want to be able to explain it and give options)?

Also something that can be done freely; Nothing proprietary

I went ahead and drew this out (yes I know my drawing skill are great :p )

This is basically what I have. Just to show you a bit what I mean :)

Now, I knew about VPN and I understand if it is the only way but theres no other technology out there? I would understand it being "difficult" as with NAT, Firewalls, etc a direct connection like this would be impossible but just to know :)

Also, how can I configure a VPN via simply command line? One of the reasons I asked for alternatives to VPN is because on some of these I only have access to a command line and Im not sure if Linux distros by default include a VPN server/client.

Thanks to all that have helped.

I went ahead and drew this out (yes I know my drawing skill are great :p )

This is basically what I have. Just to show you a bit what I mean :)

Now, I knew about VPN and I understand if it is the only way but theres no other technology out there? I would understand it being "difficult" as with NAT, Firewalls, etc a direct connection like this would be impossible but just to know :)

Also, how can I configure a VPN via simply command line? One of the reasons I asked for alternatives to VPN is because on some of these I only have access to a command line and Im not sure if Linux distros by default include a VPN server/client.

Thanks to all that have helped.

VPN Routers at each end, static IP for each sites Internet connection, create a tunnel, done. Google -

SRXN3205

I went ahead and drew this out (yes I know my drawing skill are great :p )

This is basically what I have. Just to show you a bit what I mean :)

Now, I knew about VPN and I understand if it is the only way but theres no other technology out there? I would understand it being "difficult" as with NAT, Firewalls, etc a direct connection like this would be impossible but just to know :)

Also, how can I configure a VPN via simply command line? One of the reasons I asked for alternatives to VPN is because on some of these I only have access to a command line and Im not sure if Linux distros by default include a VPN server/client.

Thanks to all that have helped.

You say you know what VPN is but then you talk about configuring it via command line. Unless you have some moderately sophisticated server at each end, what in the world are you thinking?

VPN is it. There's nothing wrong with the technology so what is the hesitation?

There are software VPN solutions like Hamachi, but just do it right and get hardware.

Edit after seeing picture: So you already have routers at each end. Well, what model are they?

VPN Routers at each end, static IP for each sites Internet connection, create a tunnel, done. Google -

SRXN3205

Ah VPN routers.....thats what I am trying to avoid!

Not really avoid, just if it cant be done any other way, it cant be done.

The SRXN3205 is kind of cheap and used at a domestic level right?; We are looking for more industrial "module" type of routers. Google - NetModule NB1600

You say you know what VPN is but then you talk about configuring it via command line. Unless you have some moderately sophisticated server at each end, what in the world are you thinking?

VPN is it. There's nothing wrong with the technology so what is the hesitation?

Edit after seeing picture: So you already have routers at each end. Well, what model are they?

This information is both unknown (actually I know one end only but im looking for something that wouldnt matter) and unreplacable :) Buying the 2 cheapest DD-WRT routers, turning on their VPN features and calling it a day wont do justice here....

Even if it is VPN, there has to be SOME configuration at the end to end point: Someone listening and another one sending (in a PTPP).

I guess VPN then is the only way.

I guess VPN then is the only way.

Once again, yes.

Buying the 2 cheapest DD-WRT routers, turning on their VPN features and calling it a day wont do justice here....

Why not?

Even if it is VPN, there has to be SOME configuration at the end to end point: Someone listening and another one sending (in a PTPP).

Of course there's configuration, but to ask how to do it via command line implies you know the equipment at each end.

Oh, what about if internet is not in the middle? (Take the picture I put there and instead of a circle that says internet replace it with a line connecting both routers)

This is nothing about the situation; Just personal intrest to learn more.

Where would anything get out to the internet then?

Oh, what about if internet is not in the middle? (Take the picture I put there and instead of a circle that says internet replace it with a line connecting both routers)

This is nothing about the situation; Just personal intrest to learn more.

If routing is configured correctly, then you'd be all set. Of course both router interfaces talking to each other will have to be on the same subnet.

you are best off doing this at the firewall. not to one or another pc. If your firewall is cli based, like say a cisco asa, then yes it can be done at a command line through either telnet or ssh. That is the way I would recommend setting it up when you need site a access to site b.

Why not?

Not an acceptable option. I guess then (preconfigured) VPN routers are the only way to do this

Of course there's configuration, but to ask how to do it via command line implies you know the equipment at each end.

I didnt directly imply anything :) I simply asked if it was possible other ways than VPN.

Where would anything get out to the internet then?

It wouldnt. It would be 2 networks (192.168.100.x and 192.168.1.x) trying to communicate with each other.

There is also GRE tunnelling, which is insecure unless wrapped inside an IPsec tunnel. That is possible on Linux. On Windows Server you could use it's built in VPN and some clever routes.

Problem is GRE is Cisco depenent

If routing is configured correctly, then you'd be all set. Of course both router interfaces talking to each other will have to be on the same subnet.

The same subnet or same subnet mask (which may be the same thing and Ive mixed up terms)

Both, in order to be on the same subnet the having the same subnet mask is the first requirement.

Why are you talking about this? the solution is to be on a vpn. You would need routeable interfaces, if everything is on the same subnet or supernet you take that ability out. I haven't seen in a long time where a network is point to point, everything is frame or mpls or vpn...all of these technologies require route-able networks not in the same subnet(s).

Why are you talking about this? the solution is to be on a vpn, even in a point to point network the subnets wouldn't be the same as they would need to route. You would need routeable interfaces, if everything is on the same subnet or supernet you take that ability out. I haven't seen in a long time where a network is point to point, everything is frame or mpls or vpn...all of these technologies require route-able networks not in the same subnet(s).

I'm responding to the question he asked; which I quoted in my first post.

Oh, what about if internet is not in the middle? (Take the picture I put there and instead of a circle that says internet replace it with a line connecting both routers)

This is nothing about the situation; Just personal intrest to learn more.

In this instance; then subnets do matter; yes or no?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!