Google and the Windows Phone Marketplace


Recommended Posts

It is no secret that Google does not see much reason to support Windows Phone 7 with their numerous services, such as YouTube, Google Voice etc, but it seems the company has now gone on the offensive even against 3rd party applications which offer their services on Windows Phone platform.

The developer of YouTube Live has received a notice from Microsoft on behalf of Google asking them to remove YouTube Live, reading:

"This message is to notify you that Microsoft has received Content Infringement Complaint (?Complaint?) regarding your application Youtube Live. A copy of the Complaint is attached for your review.

Remove Application Access Immediately

You must remove access to the application from the Marketplace within one business day. If your application is still available for download after one business day,Microsoft may remove the application without further notice. Please note that under certain circumstances Microsoft may remove your app immediately without providing you the opportunity to remove it."

Google services form a pretty important part of the online experience for most internet users, and it would be pretty damaging if Windows Phone 7 appears not to offer any access to their services. While Google is within their rights to ask for these apps to change their names, it does make it more difficult for new users to find these apps.

At least the notice means Windows Phone has become big enough for Google to take notice, which is not a bad thing in itself.

Source: http://wmpoweruser.com/google-cracking-down-on-marketplace-apps-offering-their-services/

tl:dr Google doesn't want you using their product names (GVoice, YouTube etc) for third party apps

Wait what? What a douche move.

It is, but its their trademarks so bleh. Sucks that the only application they've made for WP7 is an absolutely terrible search app. At least third party devs have been able to make pretty good Voice, youtube and google maps apps.

Can someone who has iTunes check to see if there are any third party apps using Google trademarked names in the App Store?

What's funny is that if it was Microsoft doing this to Android, this thread would be filled with complaints :rofl:

  • Like 2

It is, but its their trademarks so bleh. Sucks that the only application they've made for WP7 is an absolutely terrible search app. At least third party devs have been able to make pretty good Voice, youtube and google maps apps.

Can someone who has iTunes check to see if there are any third party apps using Google trademarked names in the App Store?

What's funny is that if it was Microsoft doing this to Android, this thread would be filled with complaints :rofl:

You're right about that, there's always this huge double standard it seems. Anyways, if I had that kinda app i'd change the name but just keep Google and Youtube etc as one of the keywords for a search, then people should still be able to find my app. Now if Google takes this to the next level and says don't use our services at all or changed the APIs in a way that killed the apps then that'd be a really huge issue.

Still, WP is a small market, why do they even care so much? And why do this now? WP and some of those apps have been out for a year or more at this point, so did they just now look at the platform (doubt it seeing as they've copied some key parts of WP over to Android). I could just be jumping to conclusions, but since this is neowin and lots of people do I'd say it's a aftereffect of the Lumia 900 doing well sales wise.

How can an app infringe their rights whereas the same site can be accessed through the web on a Mango phone?

It's not the app, it's the name. Imagine a situation where someone would distribute malware under the "YouTube Live" name. Most people would point fingers at Google and go to them for support, etc. This is pretty much a non-issue.

Google apparently went after the Metrotube app previously and had it taken down. That app never infringed on the the Google's products name either. This is just Google being total douche bags.

I guess you can't have a app with "tube" in the title now eh? Metrotube was a good app to.

It's not the app, it's the name. Imagine a situation where someone would distribute malware under the "YouTube Live" name. Most people would point fingers at Google and go to them for support, etc. This is pretty much a non-issue.

This is not android...

Google apparently went after the Metrotube app previously and had it taken down. That app never infringed on the the Google's products name either. This is just Google being total douche bags.

Google didn't go after Metrotube, the Metrotube developer decided to discontinue the app because of issues with the API.

Good move by Google... it will mislead customer who might think that its a service by google.

Developers should use some other name. also this will make Android more appealing to people who use google a lot and realize that there is no official apps on wp7.I think its a win for Google.

Good move by Google... it will mislead customer who might think that its a service by google.

Developers should use some other name. also this will make Android more appealing to people who use google a lot and realize that there is no official apps on wp7.I think its a win for Google.

Lol ok then. Maybe Microsoft should stop allowing Exchange to be used on Android (what's funny is Google doesn't even pay for it and instead uses some reverse engineered version that they made). Hotmail apps / access from all Android phones should be completely revoked too :rolleyes: Pretty sure that you'll find more people use Microsoft's offerings (mail, msn messenger etc but not search) than Google.

Nice trolling there bro.

What's funny is that those apps are often quite high quality, look pretty good and run really well. So essentially those devs are doing Google a favor by building apps that use Google Services (google would also earn money from the maps application).

But its like I said, if Microsoft did this to Android this topic would have had about 200 replies by now. Since its Google, not even 1 page.

Lol ok then. Maybe Microsoft should stop allowing Exchange to be used on Android (what's funny is Google doesn't even pay for it and instead uses some reverse engineered version that they made). Hotmail apps / access from all Android phones should be completely revoked too :rolleyes: Pretty sure that you'll find more people use Microsoft's offerings (mail, msn messenger etc but not search) than Google.

Google's request is about the application name, not about the functionality.

Forget for a moment that we are talking about Google, Youtube and Windows Phone: is it really a smart decision to use a trademark in your app name? Much unlike with patents and copyright, trademark owners are required to actively protect their trademark, or else they risk losing the ownership.

Google's request is about the application name, not about the functionality.

Forget for a moment that we are talking about Google, Youtube and Windows Phone: is it really a smart decision to use a trademark in your app name? Much unlike with patents and copyright, trademark owners are required to actively protect their trademark, or else they risk losing the ownership.

Which is why I asked are their any third party Google apps that uses their trademarks in the App Store.

Google allows you to use their trademarks in your app: http://www.google.com/permissions/guidelines.html You just need to follow their directions:

Things to do:

If you are using a Google trademark, distinguish the trademark from the surrounding text in some way. Capitalize the first letter, capitalize or italicize the entire mark, place the mark in quotes, use a different type style or font for the mark than for the generic name.

If you do not capitalize the entire mark, always spell and capitalize the trademark exactly as they are shown in the Google Trademarks and Suggested Accepted Generic Terms below.

Use the trademark only as an adjective, never as a noun or verb, and never in the plural or possessive form.

Use a generic term following the trademark, for example: GOOGLE search engine, Google search, GOOGLE web search.

Use only Google-approved artwork when using Google?s logos.

If you are using a Google logo on a web page, there must exist a minimum spacing of 25 pixels between each side of the logo and other graphic or textual elements on your web page.

Pretty sure YouTube Live (for example) follows all of that.

Google allows you to use their trademarks in your app: http://www.google.co...guidelines.html You just need to follow their directions:

Pretty sure YouTube Live (for example) follows all of that.

If you read further down in that page you'll find that Google explicitly forbids using Google trademarks in your product name.

If you read further down in that page you'll find that Google explicitly forbids using Google trademarks in your product name.

Then where's the trademark notices sent to the countless apps on the App Store that use Google names?

What about the ones in the android store that have youtube in their name? Or other google trademarks in their name?

Then where's the trademark notices sent to the countless apps on the App Store that use Google names?

What about the ones in the android store that have youtube in their name? Or other google trademarks in their name?

Maybe the app developers actually followed the instructions in the link you posted and filled the authorization request?

Lol ok then. Maybe Microsoft should stop allowing Exchange to be used on Android (what's funny is Google doesn't even pay for it and instead uses some reverse engineered version that they made). Hotmail apps / access from all Android phones should be completely revoked too :rolleyes: Pretty sure that you'll find more people use Microsoft's offerings (mail, msn messenger etc but not search) than Google.

Nice trolling there bro.

What's funny is that those apps are often quite high quality, look pretty good and run really well. So essentially those devs are doing Google a favor by building apps that use Google Services (google would also earn money from the maps application).

But its like I said, if Microsoft did this to Android this topic would have had about 200 replies by now. Since its Google, not even 1 page.

yeah fanboy... we get it.. i am sure u hurt.. and MS is not urs and what Ms should stop doing is not your to say..

Google made a smart move there and MS wont and everyone knows it.. still its win for google here.

yeah fanboy... we get it.. i am sure u hurt.. and MS is not urs and what Ms should stop doing is not your to say..

Google made a smart move there and MS wont and everyone knows it.. still its win for google here.

Actually I don't really care if no Google apps are available on Windows Phone. I use google search, but that can be done from the web browser so I don't really need an app for it. It's not really a win for google at all, because at the end of the day less people using their services if they start filing stupid requests like this.

But there are other people who use it. My point is simply this, if Apple or Microsoft did this I bet you'll be going on about how MS and Apple are evil corporations but since it's Google its Good job Google, its a win for you!

Hell let's just say Microsoft made EAS illegal on Android because its a Microsoft technoloy, and Android is a competitor then what would happen? Would you be in here going "Yeahhh it's a win for Microsoft, if you don't think so you're a fanboy"?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!