Google's Got Microsoft In A Headlock: Pay $4 Billion A Year Or Sto


Recommended Posts

http://www.businessi...tm_campaign=sai

The game

Google is playing in court against Microsoft is absolutely brilliant.

Today a judge will hear a case between

Motorola Mobility and Microsoft, reports Reuters. Microsoft says that Motorola Mobility wants to charge it $4 billion A YEAR in royalties for patents Motorola holds on WiFi and video technology.

Microsoft says those fees are unfair.

Here's what's at stake:

  • Billions of dollars in money paid from Microsoft to Motorola and eventually, Google.

  • The ability for other companies, like Qualcomm to control fees for patents they licenses.

  • The ability for Microsoft to import Xbox into the U.S. from factories in Asia.

  • Perhaps, ultimately, the ability for Android device makers to use Android without having to pay Microsoft royalties or be sued by the software giant.

If the two don't come up with an agreement, the judge could stop Microsoft from importing Xboxes into the U.S. for sale until they do.

Microsoft is saying that this amount is insanely high and unfair. A judge will rule today on if it agrees with Microsoft or not. If it does, this could affect how much power other companies get to charge for their patents used in standards.

Microsoft has a point. That is too much money for tech used as part of a standard like WiFi. Typically tech used in a standard is licensed for a tiny fee, maybe pennies per unit. It's a practice called FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms).

But Microsoft picked this fight with Google. Microsoft has been attacking Android by going after the companies that build devices on it. It has bullied

more than a half dozen Android/Linux device makers into paying it royalties on every device they made. Microsoft has reportedly been asking for $5 - $15 per unit (not pennies). Barnes & Noble refused to pay and the two were in court until they settled last week. That settlement keeps Microsoft's Android patent shake-down scheme in tact.

So Google is buying Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion and giving Microsoft a taste of its own medicine.

Geekwire's Todd Bishop is

live tweeting from the Seattle courtroom where the case is being heard today.

He

tweets: Bottom line of Motorola's argument: Microsoft should have responded to 2.25% patent royalty demand by negotiating, not filing a U.S. lawsuit. The Motorola lawyer told the judge, "Don't forget they started this, we didn't start this."

HOLY .......

This insanity has to stop, it really does. The whole thing is just a goddamn mess. Lawsuits over patents hidden behind NDA's, ridiculous licencing terms, patents on standard components, bans on product imports, copyright on lines of code. The whole tech industry is drowning in lawsuits, and the only winners are the lawyers.

It will be interesting to see what the various governments have to say about Motorola Mobility attempting to use its FRAND-backed patents as weapons. It would be quite dangerous to see them turn a FRAND portfolio into a cash cow on that level; it would literally destroy every industry surrounding such patents because only the absolutely-biggest players could afford to play the game, because every other play would be forced to do the same thing in order to equal the playing field as well as make a profit.

It also seems very short sighted on Motorola Mobility's (and Google's) behalf. It's not as though Microsoft lacks patents that are the crutch of many modern technologies. What does Motorola Mobility expect to do when their entire business, which is much smaller than Microsoft's, hangs on a similar set of patents from Microsoft, or any other company for that matter, such as Apple (where Motorola Mobility is up to the same game)?

I would not be surprised if this was not a game being played by someone at Google that thinks they just gave both Microsoft and Apple a knockout punch, when in fact they have quite possibly destroyed their recent acquisition's value. Both Microsoft and Apple will--out of necessity--collude to quickly work around standards that Motorola Mobility controls with these patents, even at great cost to the industry, because $4 billion annually cannot be maintained for licensing of essential technologies. It won't be easy for them to do it, but they will definitely do it to avoid paying such fees. After all, at $4 billion, that's $59.52 per Xbox 360 ever sold (67.2 million as of mid April, 2012) and the Xbox 360 did not start out as a profitable hardware unit.

Furthermore, what technology group or standards body is going to want to develop around Motorola Mobility's future research when it is going to cost every other player in the industry all of their profits to play? The answer is simple: none. And once a company is walled out of all industry groups, what innovations do they honestly expect to beat everyone to market with that will actually be well received by consumers?

I think this ruling could have absolutely massive ramifications on the patent system and patent litigation. If Motorola wins and Microsoft doesn't get a favorable appeal, the patent system is going to be even more messed up than it currently is, which seems impossible.

I think this ruling could have absolutely massive ramifications on the patent system and patent litigation. If Motorola wins and Microsoft doesn't get a favorable appeal, the patent system is going to be even more messed up than it currently is, which seems impossible.

Maybe this is the kick up the arse the patent system needs to reform software patents and patents on standard-mandated stuff. One can hope at least.

We the consumers need to benefit from this. Is it really good for the consumer for Motorola to have patents about wifi and video which they will never really use except for licences to other companies that will use it. If it's a feat that was hard to get to and cost a lot of cash then OK Licence it out but if a company benefits from it without paying the licence, the licence should be the only cost and a penalty applied but nothing stupid.

But nothing for things like swipe to unlock that's like putting a patent on waving hello to someone. What about physical slide locks, will everyone who made them have to pay Apple?

We need someone like Microsoft and a few other companies to come out and talk to each other in public and bring some rational thinking to the patent system in regards to technology. Just to do what is best for the consumers and the genre of technological advancement.

If this even makes it to trial it'll be 5 years from now. MS has a fleet of lawyers to deal the hundreds of antitrust lawsuits they've been handed over the years for stealing product ideas and then implementing into their own products. It won't be billions but it'll get settled for lots of millions.

I think this ruling could have absolutely massive ramifications on the patent system and patent litigation. If Motorola wins and Microsoft doesn't get a favorable appeal, the patent system is going to be even more messed up than it currently is, which seems impossible.

Let us drink beer and watch the world burn.

This insanity has to stop, it really does. The whole thing is just a goddamn mess. Lawsuits over patents hidden behind NDA's, ridiculous licencing terms, patents on standard components, bans on product imports, copyright on lines of code. The whole tech industry is drowning in lawsuits, and the only winners are the lawyers.

I completely agree, but I should note that you cannot hide patents. The only unadvertised patents are those that are hidden by the government due to "national security" concerns.

There is one caveat though. You do not have to advertise your patent portfolio either. Even though they are all published, no one has any hope of being able to go through all relevant patents to look for self-infringement. It's just not possible.

It will get thrown out of court, nobody will stand for it. Motorola/Google are just greedy. Not to mention Motorola/Google just made a massive mistake and awakened the beast, they think MS are stopping at just getting licensing fees from every Android handset sold? they are only getting started. That is my 2 cents, take with a grain of salt.

Microsoft started this by charging Android vendors for some standard patents...

Google knows it and its payback time for them... Nothing wrong with that.

Google is trying to protect android from MS, simple as that.

I disagree, what MS did was understandable and what they demanded was reasonable. If Google wants to rip off MS they have to pay the price (not to mention they [Google] are still in hot water with Oracle for the parts of Java they [did or didn't] rip off). However, what Motorola/Google are doing is insanity! if this gets passed, it will be a dark day indeed.

I think this ruling could have absolutely massive ramifications on the patent system and patent litigation. If Motorola wins and Microsoft doesn't get a favorable appeal, the patent system is going to be even more messed up than it currently is, which seems impossible.

You'll only see the patent system reformed if those sitting on a pile of patents get really burnt by it. Big companies have invested far too much money in those patents to accept any reform that weakens the offensive value of their IP, even if that means being slightly inconvenienced every now and then.

I disagree, what MS did was understandable and what they demanded was reasonable. If Google wants to rip off MS they have to pay the price (not to mention they [Google] are still in hot water with Oracle for the parts of Java they [did or didn't] rip off). However, what Motorola/Google are doing is insanity! if this gets passed, it will be a dark day indeed.

All MS had to do was bargain, not fiile a lawsuit. They expect everyone to bow to them, and Google is taking a stand. Not to mention MS attacking all the handset makers. People complained about Google not helping, well here it is.

Microsoft started this by charging Android vendors for some standard patents...

Google knows it and its payback time for them... Nothing wrong with that.

Google is trying to protect android from MS, simple as that.

When this was first announced, the Google fans claimed that Google had no part in it, that Google does not yet own Moto because no money has yet changed hands and therefore cannot control what they do. Now you say it is time for Google to get payback, that Google is protecting Android. If that is true, then I guess Google is controlling Moto. So which is it, Google does control Moto, or they do not control Moto.

Either way, I think it is time for Microsoft to start charging $200/device for the patents Android is infringing on. Add to this what Oracle will get since they have won at least part of their patent dispute, Android will become very expensive.

I completely agree, but I should note that you cannot hide patents. The only unadvertised patents are those that are hidden by the government due to "national security" concerns.

I was referring to when when Microsoft was (and still is) litigating against Android handset manufacturers. The manufacturers were forced to sign a NDA before Microsoft would tell them which patents they'd violated. To me, that's beyond insane.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!