AT&T CEO Blames Google for Slow Android Updates

By Roger H.
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Roger H. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson has been talking a lot the last week. He first blamed wireless price hikes (increases he says he would have imposed anyway) on the blocked T-Mobile deal, then informed the public he wished he'd never offered unlimited data in the first place. Now Stephenson has found himself in a little PR hot water by blaming Google on slow Android updates, and in the process illustrating that he's either not really sure how his own products work -- or he's just not particularly honest.

"Google determines what platform gets the newest releases and when," Stephenson stated this week in response to a conference question about why some devices don't get timely updates. "A lot of times, that?s a negotiated arrangement and that?s something we work at hard." That statement rather confused Google, who issued a statement saying that Stephenson was apparently confused:

?Mr. Stephenson?s carefully worded quote caught our attention and frankly we don?t understand what he is referring to. Google does not have any agreements in place that require a negotiation before a handset launches. Google has always made the latest release of Android available as open source at source.android.com as soon as the first device based on it has launched. This way, we know the software runs error-free on hardware that has been accepted and approved by manufacturers, operators and regulatory agencies such as the FCC. We then release it to the world."

Again, you start to wonder if after the T-Mobile fiasco AT&T executives should just stop talking for a while. Quite often it's the carriers -- and their fear of change and layers of device bloatware -- that are to blame for update delays. Consider also while Stephenson's busy blaming Google for problems, AT&T is busy crippling the bootloaders of the latest and greatest Android devices like the HTC One X.

Source: http://www.dslreport...-Updates-119373

Grand Master

+Majesticmerc MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

It's obviously not Google's fault, given how quickly the Nexus devices generally receive their updates. My experience with Android updates is that it's either the manufacturer holding up the update while they test the update on their own mods (i.e. Sense, Touchwiz, etc), or the carrier testing it and/or adding in their own bloat (my first HTC One X update was delayed by 2 weeks before T-Mobile approved it).

Grand Master

Roger H. Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Problem with that is they come out with updates for the "International" devices looong before one comes out for AT&T (and yes Verizon and the rest of the US carriers). The Nexus S from AT&T still hasn't received an ICS update while the T-Mobile one got it in December. There's only a small difference between the 2 (3G radio) so shouldn't be that long of an update. Sprint being a different beast with the addition of extra radios got theirs last month, still late but I guess. AT&T is the only one left here.

There are a few other examples of such madness that AT&T is behind. This is coming from an AT&T user but I have a internation SGS2 - GT-I9100 instead of the SGH-i777 version. Another device that should technically already have ICS as it's basically the same as the international one, just added NFC.

Grand Master

jakem1

Posted
Posted

It's Google's platform so it seems reasonable to blame them for the fact that the Android update process is broken. Whether source code is available quickly on some website is irrelevant if users can't get there hands on an update for their phone. It's not as if the problem is restricted to AT&T either.

Grand Master

xendrome

Posted
Posted

It's Google's platform so it seems reasonable to blame them for the fact that the Android update process is broken. Whether source code is available quickly on some website is irrelevant if users can't get there hands on an update for their phone. It's not as if the problem is restricted to AT&T either.

I'd go back on what the others are saying to some extent, the carriers have to spend 2-3 months minimum trying to update their bloat ware and add more 3rd party apps in prior to release. This holds things up.

  • Squirrelington
  • Like 1
Grand Master

Hell-In-A-Handbasket

Posted
Posted

I'm with others, I don't think it's google limiting what devices can get what, I'm thinking its the manufactures of the phones. Got to get people to upgrade somehow

Enthusiast

DevilsNotDead

Posted
Posted

It's Google's platform so it seems reasonable to blame them for the fact that the Android update process is broken. Whether source code is available quickly on some website is irrelevant if users can't get there hands on an update for their phone. It's not as if the problem is restricted to AT&T either.

As expected!!! there will be some fanboy to just bash...

Its like blaming Linus Travolta because no update was released for Ubuntu.

Grand Master

jakem1

Posted
Posted

I'd go back on what the others are saying to some extent, the carriers have to spend 2-3 months minimum trying to update their bloat ware and add more 3rd party apps in prior to release. This holds things up.

It's not just the carriers though is it (the OEMs need to ensure that their skins are compatible too) and it's not just a 2-3 month wait. 6 months after its release ICS still isn't available for all phones. I agree that this holds things up but Google created an OS that allows /needs this customisation and hasn't done anything to control it. That's why I think they're ultimately to blame.

I don't think AT&T are blameless as they've proven with WP7 that they're more than capable of holding up an update. But the wait for Android updates clearly occurs around the world.

Grand Master

Scorbing

Posted
Posted

The AT&T CEO is full of crap. Everybody knows how irresponsible AT&T is when it comes to updating their Android phones. How long has ICS been out? Over 6 months. Has AT&T updated any of their ICS-Capable phones? No.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2

      By Copernic · Posted

      Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either

      By +pmrd · Posted

      Ahhh...
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Google reshuffles its AI coding team as it struggles to catch Anthropic

      By excalpius · Posted

      Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge

      By ExPat · Posted

      I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!